Evolution of breeding systems and fruits in New World Galium and relatives (Rubiaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1630-1646

  Soza, Valerie L ^a   Olmstead, Richard G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Breeding systems; Cruciata; ETS; Fruits; Galium; Phylogeny; rpoB trnC; trnC psbM; trnL ndhJ; Valantia

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HERMAPHRODITISM; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLYGAMY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

CRUCIATA; GALIUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; RUBIACEAE; VALANTIA;

EID: 78049317314     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000130     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abdel Khalik, K., M. Abd El-Ghani, and A. El Kordy. 2008. Fruit and seed morphology in Galium L. (Rubiaceae) and its importance for taxonomic identification. Acta Botanica Croatica 67: 1-20.
2. Ainsworth, C. 2000. Boys and girls come out to play: The molecular biology of dioecious plants. Annals of Botany 86: 211-221.
3. Ainsworth, C., J. Parker, and V. Buchanan-Wollaston. 1998. Sex determination in plants. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 38: 167-223.
4. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
5. Baldwin, B. G., and S. Markos.1998. Phylogeneticutilityoftheexternal transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDNA: Congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 449-463.
6. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 274-294.
7. Batra, S. W. T.1984. PhytophagesandpollinatorsofGalium(Rubiaceae) in Eurasia and North America. Environmental Entomology 13: 1113-1124.
8. Bawa, K. S.1980. Evolutionofdioecyinflowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39.
9. Bawa, K. S., and P. A. Opler. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 29: 167-179.
10. Bisby, F. A., Y. R. Roskov, T. M. Orrell, D. Nicolson, L. E. Paglinawan, N. Bailly, P. M. Kirk, et al. [eds.]. 2009. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2009 Annual Checklist. Website http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2009/ [accessed 30 October 2009].
11. Brandão de Freitas, L., S. Cavalli-Molina, and H. Winge. 1995. Sources of genetic variability in a neotropical cleistogamous species, Relbunium hypocarpium, Rubiaceae. Revista Brasileira de Genetica 18: 289-296.
12. Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogenetic studies within Rubiaceae and relationships to other families based on molecular data. Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 33-50.
13. Bremer, B., and O. Eriksson. 1992. Evolution of fruit characters and dispersal modes in the tropical family Rubiaceae. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 47: 79-95.
14. Cavalli-Molina, S., V. E. P. Motta, M. Schiengold, and H. Winge. 1989. Identical isoenzyme patterns in sib plants of Relbunium hypocarpium (Rubiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Genetica 12: 361-368.
15. Cavalli-Molina, S., and H. Winge. 1988. Phenetic relationships among populations of the autogamous plant Relbunium hypocarpium (Rubiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Genetica 11: 401-418.
16. Charlesworth, D., and D. S. Guttman. 1999. The evolution of dioecy and plant sex chromosome systems. In C. C. Ainsworth [ed.], Sex determination in plants, 25-49. Bios Scientific, Oxford, United Kingdom.
17. Chenna, R., H. Sugawara, T. Koike, R. Lopez, T. J. Gibson, D. G. Higgins, and J. D. Thompson. 2003. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 3497-3500.
18. Delph, L. F., and D. E. Wolf. 2005. Evolutionary consequences of gender plasticity in genetically dimorphic breeding systems. New Phytologist 166: 119-128.
19. Dempster, L. T. 1959. A re-evaluation of Galium multiflorum and related taxa. Brittonia 11: 105-122.
20. Dempster, L. T. 1973. The polygamous species of the genus Galium (Rubiaceae), section Lophogalium, of Mexico and southwestern United States. University of California Publications in Botany 64: 1-36.
21. Dempster, L. T. 1978. The genus Galium (Rubiaceae) in Mexico and Central America. University of California Publications in Botany 73: 1-33.
22. Dempster, L. T. 1980. The genus Galium section Lophogalium (Rubiaceae) in South America. Allertonia 2: 247-279.
23. Dempster, L. T. 1981. The genus Galium (Rubiaceae) in South America. II. Allertonia 2: 393-426.
24. Dempster, L. T. 1982. The genus Galium (Rubiaceae) in South America. III. Allertonia 3: 211-258.
25. Dempster, L. T. 1990. The genus Galium (Rubiaceae) in South America. IV. Allertonia 5: 283-345.
26. Dempster, L. T. 1993. Rubiaceae. In J. C. Hickman [ed.], The Jepson manual, higher plants of California, 976-986. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
27. Dempster, L. T., and F. Ehrendorfer. 1965. Evolution of the Galium multiflorum complex in western North America. II. Critical taxonomic revision. Brittonia 17: 289-334.
28. Dempster, L. T., and G. L. Stebbins. 1965. The fleshy-fruited Galium species of California (Rubiaceae). I. Cytological findings and some taxonomic conclusions. Madrono 18: 105-113.
29. Dempster, L. T., and G. L. Stebbins. 1968. A cytotaxonomic revision of the fleshy-fruited Galium species of the Californias and southern Oregon (Rubiaceae). University of California Publications in Botany 46: 1-52.
30. Dempster, L. T., and G. L. Stebbins. 1971. The Galium angustifolium complex (Rubiaceae) of California and Baja California. Madrono 21: 70-95.
31. Devesa, J. A., and A. Ortega-Olivencia. 2003. A new species of Valantia (Rubiaceae) from Spain. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 143: 331-335.
32. Doyle, J. J., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
33. Ehrendorfer, F. 1955. Revision of the genus Relbunium (Endl.) Benth. et Hook. (Rubiaceae-Galieae). Botanische Jahrbücher 76: 516-553.
34. Ehrendorfer, F. 1956. Survey of the Galium multiflorum complex in western North America. Contributions from the Dudley Herbarium 5: 1-21.
35. Ehrendorfer, F. 1961. Evolution of the Galium multiflorum complex in western North America. I. Diploids and polyploids in this dioecious group. Madrono 16: 109-140.
36. Ehrendorfer, F. 1965. Dispersal mechanisms, genetic systems, and colonizing abilities in some flowering plant families. In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins [eds.], The genetics of colonizing species, 331-352. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
37. Ehrendorfer, F. 1971. Evolution and eco-geographical differentiation in some South-West Asiatic Rubiaceae. In P. H. Davis, P. C. Harper, and I. C. Hedge [eds.], Plant life of South-West Asia, 195-215. Botanical Society of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
38. Ehrendorfer, F., F. Krendl, and C. Puff. 1976. Galium L. In T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, and D. A. Webb [eds.], Flora Europaea, vol. 4, 14-36. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
39. Ehrendorfer, F., and E. Schönbeck-Temesy. 1982. Galium L. In P. H. Davis [ed.], Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 7, 767-849. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
40. Ehrendorfer, F., E. Schönbeck-Temesy, C. Puff, and W. Rechinger. 2005. Rubiaceae. In Flora Iranica, no. 176. Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, Vienna, Austria.
41. Endlicher, S. 1839. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita. Friedrich Beck, Vienna, Austria.
42. Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
43. Flores, S., and D. W. Schemske. 1984. Dioecy and monoecy in the flora of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands: Ecological correlates. Biotropica 16: 132-139.
44. Freeman, D. C., K. T. Harper. and W. K. Ostler. 1980. Ecology of plant dioecy in the intermountain region of western North America and California. Oecologia 44: 410-417.
45. Givnish, T. J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: Dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 34: 959-972.
46. Graham, S. W., P. A. Reeves, A. C. E. Burns, and R. G. Olmstead. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (6 Supplement): S83-S96.
47. Hart, J. A. 1985. Evolution of dioecism in Lepechinia Willd. sect. Parviflorae (Lamiaceae). Systematic Botany 10: 147-154.
48. Heinken, T., and D. Raudnitschka. 2002. Do wild ungulates contribute to the dispersal of vascular plants in central European forests by epizoochory? A case study in NE Germany. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 121: 179-194.
49. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17: 754-755.
50. Ibarra-Manriquez, G., and K. Oyama. 1992. Ecological correlates of reproductive traits of Mexican rain forest trees. American Journal of Botany 79: 383-394.
51. Lewis, D. 1942. The evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 17: 46-67.
52. Lloyd, D. G. 1980. The distributions of gender in four angiosperm species illustrating two evolutionary pathways to dioecy. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 34: 123-134.
53. Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
54. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2009. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.72. Website http://mesquit-eproject.org [accessed 10 January 2010].
55. Manen, J.-F., A. Natali, and F. Ehrendorfer. 1994. Phylogeny of Rubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. Plant Systematics and Evolution 190: 195-211.
56. Martin, A. C., H. S. Zim, and A. L. Nelson. 1951. American wildlife and plants. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
57. Matlack, G. R. 1994. Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75: 1491-1502.
58. Miller, M. A., M. T. Holder, R. Vos, P. E. Midford, T. Liebowitz, L. Chan, P. Hoover, and T. Warnow. 2010. The CIPRES Portals. CIPRES. Website http://www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal [accessed 06 January 2010].
59. Mindell, D. P. 1991. Aligning DNA sequences: Homology and phylogenetic weighting. In M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft [eds.], Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, 73-89. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
60. Mitchell, C. H., and P. K. Diggle. 2005. The evolution of unisexual flowers: Morphological and functional convergence results from diverse developmental transitions. American Journal of Botany 92: 1068-1076.
61. Natali, A., J.-F. Manen, and F. Ehrendorfer. 1995. Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae-Rubioideae, in particular the tribe Rubieae: Evidence from a non-coding chloroplast DNA sequence. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 428-439.
62. Natali, A., J.-F. Manen, M. Kiehn, and F. Ehrendorfer. 1996. Tribal, generic and specific relationships in the Rubioideae-Rubieae (Rubiaceae) based on sequence data of a cpDNA intergene region. Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 193-203.
63. Niewland, J. A. 1910. A new genus of Rubiaceae. American Midland Naturalist 1: 263-264.
64. Nylander, J. A. A., J. C. Wilgenbusch, D. L. Warren, and D. L. Swofford. 2008. AWTY (are we there yet?): A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24: 581-583.
65. Pobedimova, E. G. 2000. Galium L. In B. K. Schischkin [ed.], Flora of the USSR, vol. 23, 345-459. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany.
66. Porto, M. L., J. E. A. Mariath, M. L. Detoni, S. S. Cavalli, H. Winge, and F. Ehrendorfer. 1977. New species of Relbunium (Rubiaceae) from Brazil, with notes on flavonoid and peroxidase patterns. Plant Systematics and Evolution 128: 177-193.
67. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14: 817-818.
68. Renner, S. S. 1998. Phylogenetic affinities of Monimiaceae based on cpDNA gene and spacer sequences. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1: 61-77.
69. Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
70. Renner, S. S., and H. Won. 2001. Repeated evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Siparunaceae (Laurales). Systematic Biology 50: 700-712.
71. Richards, A. J. 1997. Plant breeding systems, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
72. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19: 1572-1574.
73. Ross, M. D. 1982. Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. American Naturalist 119: 297-318.
74. Sakai, A. K., W. L. Wagner, D. M. Ferguson, and D. R. Herbst. 1995. Biogeographical and ecological correlates of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology 76: 2530-2543.
75. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatus. 1989. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, vol. 1-3, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
76. Schumann, K. 1897. Rubiaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl, [eds.], Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4, part 4, 1-156. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
77. Shaw, J., E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, et al. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92: 142-166.
78. Shaw, J., E. B. Lickey, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany 94: 275-288.
79. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Systematic Biology 51: 492-508.
80. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 2001. CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17: 1246-1247.
81. Simmons, M. P. 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 874-879.
82. Simmons, M. P., and H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
83. Soza, V. L., and R. G. Olmstead. 2010. Molecular systematics of tribe Rubieae (Rubiaceae): Evolution of major clades, development of leaf-like whorls, and biogeography. Taxon 59: 755-771.
84. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
85. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
86. Tao, C., and Z. Hua. In preparation. Rubiaceae. In Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven, D. Y. Hong [eds.], Flora of China, vol. 19. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Website http://flora.huh.harvard. edu/china/mss/volume19/Rubiaceae-MO_original.htm [accessed 17 February 2009].
87. Turner, B. L., and G. Turner.1983. A new gypsophilic species of Galium (Rubiaceae) from north-central Mexico. Madrono 30: 31-33.
88. Vamosi, J. C., S. P. Otto, and S. C. H. Barrett.2003. Phylogeneticanalysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 1006-1018.
89. Vamosi, J. C., and S. M. Vamosi. 2004. The role of diversification in causing the correlates of dioecy. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 58: 723-731.
90. Webb, C. J., D. G. Lloyd, and L. F. Delph. 1999. Gender dimorphism in indigenous New Zealand plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany 37: 119-130.
91. Weiblen, G. D., R. K. Oyama, and M. J. Donoghue. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. American Naturalist 155: 46-58.
92. Weller, S. G., and A. K. Sakai. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 167-199.
93. Willson, M. F., C. Sabag, J. Figueroa, J. J. Armesto, and M. Caviedes. 1996. Seed dispersal by lizards in Chilean rainforest. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural (Valparaiso, Chile) 69: 339-342.
94. Wright, S. D., C. G. Yong, S. R. Wichman, J. W. Dawson, and R. C. Gardner. 2001. Stepping stones to Hawaii: A trans-equatorial dispersal pathway for Metrosideros (Myrtaceae) inferred from nrDNA (ITS+ETS). Journal of Biogeography 28: 769-774.
95. Yamazaki, T. 1993. Rubiaceae. In K. Iwatsuki, T. Yamazaki, D. E. Boufford, H. Ohba [eds.], Flora of Japan, vol. 3a, 206-240. Kodansha, Tokyo, Japan.
96. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 717-724.
97. Zwickl, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence data sets under the maximum like-lihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA. Website http://garli.nescent.org [accessed 06 January 2010].