Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons

American Naturalist

Volumn 155, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 46-58

  Weiblen, George D ^a,b   Oyama, Ryan K ^a   Donoghue, Michael J ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breeding systems; Dioecy; Maximum likelihood; Monocotyledons; Parsimony; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034095094     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/303303     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ackerly, D. D., and M. J. Donoghue. 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). American Naturalist 152:767-791.
2. Baker, H. G. 1984. Some functions of dioecy in seed plants. American Naturalist 124:149-158.
3. Bawa, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:15-39.
4. -. 1982. Outcrossing and the incidence of dioecism in island floras. American Naturalist 119:866-871.
5. Bierzychudek, P. 1984. Assessing "optimal" life histories in a fluctuating environment: the evolution of sex-changing by jack-in-the-pulpit. American Naturalist 123:829-840.
6. Bogler, D. J., and B. B. Simpson. 1996. Phylogeny of Agavaceae based on ITS rDNA sequence variation. American Journal of Botany 83:1225-1235.
7. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112:975-997.
8. Charnov, E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
9. Chase, M. W., M. R. Duvall, H. G. Hills, J. G. Conran, A. V. Cox, L. E. Eguiarte, J. Hartwell, et al. 1995a. Molecular phylogenetics of Lilianae. Pages 109-137 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
10. Chase, M. W., D. W. Stevenson, P. Wilkin, and P. J. Rudall. 1995b. Monocot systematics: a combined analysis. Pages 685-730 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
11. Collins, T. M., P. H. Wimberger, and G. P. Nayler. 1994. Compositional bias, character-state bias and character state reconstruction using parsimony. Systematic Biology 43:482-496.
12. Cox, P. A., K. L. Huynh, and B. C. Stone. 1995. Evolution and systematics of the Pandanaceae. Pages 663-684 in P. J. Rudall, P. B. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
13. Darwin, C. R. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. J. Murray, London.
14. DeLong, A., A. Calderon-Urrea, and S. L. Dellaporta. 1993. Sex determination gene TASSELSEED2 of maize encodes a short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase required for stage-specific floral organ abortion. Cell 74:757-768.
15. de Queiroz, A., M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:657-681.
16. Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43:1137-1156.
17. -. 1994. Progress and prospects in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81:405-418.
18. Donoghue, M. J., and D. A. Ackerly. 1996. Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 351:1241-1249.
19. Donoghue, M. J., R. H. Ree, and D. A. Baum. 1998. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends in Plant Science 3:311-317.
20. French, J. C., M. G. Chung, and Y. K. Hur. 1995. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Ariflorae. Pages 255-275 in P. J. Rudall, P. B. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
21. Frumhoff, P. C., and H. K. Reeve. 1994. Using phylogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: a critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48:172-180.
22. Givnish, T. J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution 34:959-972.
23. -. 1982. Outcrossing versus ecological constraints in the evolution of dioecy. American Naturalist 119: 849-865.
24. Hart, J. A. 1985. Evolution of dioecism in Lepechinia Willd. sect. Parviflorae (Lamiaceae). Systematic Botany 10: 147-154.
25. Janz, N., and S. Nylin. 1998. Butterflies and plants: a phylogenetic study. Evolution 52:486-502.
26. Kellogg, E. A., and C. S. Campbell. 1987. Phylogenetic analyses of the Gramineae. Pages 310-322 in T. R. Soderstrom, K. W. Hilu, C. S. Campbell, and M. E. Barkworth, eds. Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
27. Kellogg, E. A., and H. P. Linder. 1995. Phylogeny of Poales. Pages 511-542 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
28. Kellogg, E. A., and L. Watson. 1993. Phylogenetic studies of a large data set. I. Bambusoideae, Andropogonidae, and Pooidae (Graminae). Botanical Review 59:273-343.
29. Kohn, J. R., S. W. Graham, B. Morton, J. J. Doyle, and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50:1454-1469.
30. Kress, W. J. 1995. Phylogeny of the Zingiberanae: morphology and molecules. Pages 443-460 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
31. Le Roux, L. G., and E. A. Kellogg. 1999. Floral development and the formation of unisexual spikelets in the Andropogoneae (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 354-366.
32. Les, D. H., M. A. Cleland, and M. Waycott. 1997. Phylogenetic studies in Alismatidae. II. Evolution of marine angiosperms (seagrasses) and hydrophily. Systematic Botany 22:443-463.
33. Lewis, D. 1942. The evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biological Review of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 17:46-67.
34. Linder, H. P., and E. A. Kellogg. 1995. Phylogenetic patterns in the commelinid clade. Pages 473-496 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
35. Lloyd, D., G. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. American Naturalist 120:571-585.
36. Losos, J. B. 1995. An approach to the analysis of comparative data when a phylogeny is unavailable or incomplete. Systematic Biology 43:117-123.
37. Maddison, D. R. 1994. Phylogenetic methods for inferring the evolutionary history and process of change in discretely valued characters. Annual Review of Entomology 39:267-292.
38. Maddison, W. 1989. Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. Cladistics 5:365-377.
39. Maddison, W., and D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
40. Mason-Gamer, R. J., and E. A. Kellogg. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Biology 45: 524-545.
41. Nixon, K. C., and J. I. Davis. 1991. Polymorphic taxa, missing values and cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7:233-241.
42. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 255:37-45.
43. -. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26:331-348.
44. Ree, R. H. and M. J. Donoghue. 1998. Step matrices and the interpretation of homoplasy. Systematic Biology 47: 582-588.
45. -. 1999. Inferring rates of change in flower symmetry in asterid angiosperms. Systematic Biology 48: 633-641.
46. Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82:596-606.
47. Rolland, C., E. Danchin, and M. de Fraipont. 1998. The evolution of coloniality in birds in relation to food, habitat, predation and life-history traits: a comparative analysis. American Naturalist 151:514-529.
48. Ross, M. D. 1982. Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. American Naturalist 119:297-318.
49. Rudall, P. J., P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. 1995. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
50. Sakai, A. K., W. L. Wagner, D. M. Ferguson, and D. R. Herbst. 1995. Biogeographical and ecological correlates of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology 76:2530-2543.
51. Sanderson, M. 1991. In search of homoplastic tendencies: statistical inference of topological patterns in homoplasy. Evolution 45:351-358.
52. Sanderson, M., A. Purvis, and C. Henze. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: assembling the trees of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:105-109.
53. Schultz, S. T. 1994. Nucleo-cytoplasmic male sterility and alternative routes to dioecy. Evolution 48:1933-1945.
54. Schultz, T. R., R. B. Cocroft, and G. A. Churchill. 1996. The reconstruction of ancestral character states. Evolution 50:504-511.
55. Sillen-Tullberg, B. 1988. Evolution of gregariousness in aposematic butterfly larvae: a phylogenetic analysis. Evolution 42:293-305.
56. -. 1993. The effect of biased inclusion of taxa on the correlation between discrete characters in phylogenetic trees. Evolution 47:1182-1191.
57. Simpson, D. 1995. Relationships within Cyperales. Pages 497-509 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
58. Simpson, M. G. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of the Haemodoraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77:722-784.
59. Stevenson, D. W., and H. Loconte. 1995. Cladistic analysis of monocot families. Pages 543-578 in P. J. Rudall, P. B. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
60. Swensen, S. M., J. N. Luthi, and L. H. Rieseberg. 1998. Datiscaceae revisited: monophyly and the sequence of breeding system evolution. Systematic Botany 23: 157-169.
61. Swofford, D. L., and W. P. Maddison. 1992. Parsimony, character-state reconstructions, and evolutionary inferences. Pages 186-223 in R. L. Mayden, ed. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
62. Thomson, J. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection, and the evolution of dioecy in plants. American Naturalist 118:443-449.
63. Thomson, J. D., and J. Brunet. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5:11-16.
64. Uhl, N. W., J. Dransfield, J. I. Davis, M. A. Luckow, K. S. Hansen, and J. J. Doyle. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among palms: cladistic analyses of morphological and chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Pages 623-661 in P. J. Rudall, P. B. Cribb, D. F. Cutler and C. J., Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
65. Van den Borre, A. 1994. Taxonomy of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae), with special reference to the genus Eragrostis. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University.
66. Watson, L., and M. J. Dallawitz. 1992. The grass genera of the world. C.A.B. International, Wallingford.
67. Weller, S. G., and A. Sakai. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics (in press).
68. Weller, S. G., M. J. Donoghue, and D. Charlesworth. 1995. The evolution of self-incompatibility in flowering plants: a phylogenetic approach. Pages 355-382 in P. C. Hoch and A. G. Stephenson, eds. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
69. Weller, S. G., A. K. Sakai, A. E. Rankin, A. Golonka, B. Kutcher, and K. E. Ashby. 1998. Dioecy and the evolution of pollination systems in Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae) in the Hawaiian Islands. American Journal of Botany 85:1377-1388.
70. Westergaard, M. 1958. The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Advances in Genetics 9:217-281.
71. Willson, M. F. 1982. Sexual selection and dicliny in angiosperms. American Naturalist 119:579-583.
72. -. 1991. Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and plant phylogeny. Evolutionary Ecology 5:69-87.
73. Yampolsky, C., and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genetica 3:1-62.