The role of diversification in causing the correlates of dioecy

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 723-731

  Vamosi, Jana C ^a,b   Vamosi, Steven M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Angiosperms; Breeding system; Dioecy; Ecological correlations; Extinction; Phylogeny; Sister group comparison; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; DIOECY; EVOLUTION; EXTINCTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SPECIES RICHNESS;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 2342452552     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00405.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baker, H. G. 1954. Race formation and reproductive method in flowering plants. Evolution 7:114-143.
2. Bawa, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:15-39.
3. Bawa, K. S., and P. A. Opler. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution 29:167-179.
4. Beach, J. H. 1981. Pollinator foraging and the evolution of dioecy. Am. Nat. 118:572-577.
5. Bentham, G., and J. D. Hooker. 1880. Genera Plantarum. L. Reeve, London, U.K.
6. Bierzychudek, P. 1987. Pollinators increase the cost of sex by avoiding female flowers. Ecology 63:444-447.
7. Carlquist, S. 1974. Island biology. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
8. Charlesworth, D. 1993. Why are unisexual flowers associated with wind pollination and unspecialized pollinators? Am. Nat. 141: 481-490.
9. Charnov, E. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Coley, P. D., and J. A. Barone. 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:305-335.
11. Dodd, M. E., J. Silvertown, and M. W. Chase. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53:732-744.
12. Cracraft, J. 1981. Pattern and process in paleobiology: the role of cladistic analysis in systematic paleontology. Paleobiology 7: 456-468.
13. Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
14. Eriksson, O., and B. Bremer. 1992. Pollination systems, dispersal modes, life forms, and diversification rates in angiosperm families. Evolution 46:258-266.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
16. Fox, J. F. 1985. Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination, and dispersal. Oecologia 67:244-249.
17. Freeman, D. C., K. T. Harper, and W. K. Ostler. 1980. Ecology of plant dioecy in the intermountain region of western North America and California. Oecologia 44:410-417.
18. Givnish, T. J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution 34:959-972.
19. Harms, K. E., and J. W. Dalling. 1997. Damage and herbivory tolerance through resprouting as an advantage of large seed size in tropical trees and lianas. J. Trop. Ecol. 13:617-621.
20. Heilbuth, J. C. 2000. Lower species richness in dioecious clades. Am. Nat. 156:241-261.
21. _. 2001. Evolutionary consequences of dioecy in angiosperms. Ph.D. diss., University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
22. Heilbuth, J. C., K. L. Ilves, and S. P. Otto. 2001. The consequences of dioecy on seed dispersal: modelling the seed shadow handicap. Evolution 55:880-888.
23. Herrera, C. M. 1989. Seed dispersal by animals: a role in angiosperm diversification? Am. Nat. 133:309-322.
24. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants. Vois. 1, 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
25. Kiester, A. R., R. L. Lande, and D. E. Schemske. 1984. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators. Am. Nat. 124:220-243.
26. Janzen, D. H. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:465-492.
27. Lloyd, D. G. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. Am. Nat. 120:571-585.
28. Mabberley, D. J. 1997. The plant book: a portable dictionary of the higher plants. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
29. Muenchow, G. E. 1987. Is dioecy associated with fleshy fruit? Am. J. Bot. 74:287-293.
30. Pannell, J. R., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1998. Baker's law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution 52: 657-668.
31. Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82:596-606.
32. Ricklefs, R. E., and S. S. Renner. 1994. Species richness within families of flowering plants. Evolution 48:1619-1636.
33. Sakai, A. K., and S. G. Weller. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. Pp. 1-31 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, New York.
34. Sakai, A. K., S. G. Weller, W. L. Wagner, P. S. Soltis, and D. E. Soltis. 1997. Phylogenetic perspectives on the evolution of dioecy: adaptive radiation in the endemic Hawaiian genera Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae). Pp. 455-472 in T. J. Givnish and K. J. Sytsma, eds. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
35. Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1994. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science 264: 1590-1593.
36. Sims, H. J., and K. J. McConway. 2003. Nonstochastic variation of species-level diversification rates within angiosperms. Evolution 57:460-479.
37. Slowinski, J. B., and C. Guyer. 1993. Testing whether certain traits have caused amplified diversification: an improved method based on a model of random speciation and extinction. Am. Nat. 142:1019-1024.
38. Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis, and M. W. Chase. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402:402-404.
39. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
40. Thomson, J. D., and J. Brunet. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:11-16.
41. Tiffney, B. H., and S. J. Mazer. 1995. Angiosperm growth habit, dispersal and diversification reconsidered. Evol. Ecol. 9:93-117.
42. Vamosi, J. C., and S. P. Otto. 2002. When looks can kill: the evolution of sexually-dimorphic floral display and extinction of dioecious plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1187-1194.
43. Vamosi, J. C., S. P. Otto, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1006-1018.
44. van Dulmen, A. 2001. Pollination and phenology of flowers in the canopy of two contrasting rain forest types in Amazonia, Columbia. Plant Ecology 153:73-85.
45. Verdú, M. 2002. Age at maturity and diversification in woody angiosperms. Evolution 56:1352-1361.
46. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.
47. Wilson, W. G., and L. D. Harder. 2003. Reproductive uncertainty and the relative competitiveness of simultaneous hermaphroditism versus dioecy. Am. Nat. 162:220-241.