Evolutionary consequences of gender plasticity in genetically dimorphic breeding systems

New Phytologist

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 119-128

  Delph, Lynda F ^a   Wolf, Diana E ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

Author keywords

Androdioecy; Breeding system evolution; Dioecy; Functional gender; Gender plasticity; Gynodioecy; Subdioecy

Indexed keywords

DIOECY; EVOLUTION; GENDER; HERMAPHRODITISM; PLASTICITY;

EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW;

EVOLUTION; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTS; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 15944406836     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01339.x     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Arroyo MTK, Raven PH. 1975. The evaluation of subdioecy in morphologically gynodioecious species of Fuchsia sect. Encliandra (Onagraceae). Evolution 29: 500-511.
2. Arzimendi MC, Dominguez CA, Dirzo R. 1996. The role of an avian nectar robber and of hummingbird pollinators in the reproduction of two plant species. Functional Ecology 10: 119-127.
3. Atsatt PR, Rundel PW. 1982. Pollinator maintenance vs. fruit production: partitioned reproductive effort in subdioecious Fuchsia lycioides. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 69: 199-208.
4. Barrett SCH. 1992. Gender variation and the evolution of dioecy i n Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5: 423-444.
5. Barrett SCH, Case AL, Peters GB. 1999. Gender modification and resource allocation in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). Journal of Ecology 87: 123-137.
6. Bawa K. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39.
7. Case AL, Barrett SCH. 2004. Environmental stress and the evolution of dioecy: Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae) in Western Australia. Evolutionary Ecology 18: 145-164.
8. Charlesworth D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 333-348.
9. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
10. Charlesworth D, Laporte V. 1998. The male-sterility polymorphism of Silene vulgaris: analysis of genetic data from two populations and comparison with Thymus vulgaris. Genetics 150: 1267-1282.
11. Corriveau JL, Coleman AW. 1988. Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperm species. American Journal of Botany 75: 1443-1458.
12. Darwin C. 1877. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. London: John Murray.
13. Delph LF. 1990a. The evolution of gender dimorphism in New Zealand Hebe (Scrophulariaceae) species. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 4: 85-97.
14. Delph LF. 1990b. Sex-differential resource allocation patterns in the subdioecious shrub Hebe subalpina. Ecology 71: 1342-1351.
15. Delph LF. 1990c. Sex-ratio variation in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe strictissima (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 44: 134-142.
16. Delph LF. 1993. Factors affecting intraplant variation in flowering and fruiting in the gynodioecious species Hebe subalpina. Journal of Ecology 81: 287-296.
17. Delph LF. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in life history. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, eds. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 149-173.
18. Delph LF. 2003. Sexual dimorphism in gender plasticity and its consequences for breeding system evolution. Evolution and Development 5: 34-39.
19. Delph LF, Lloyd DG. 1991. Environmental and genetic control of gender in the dimorphic shrub Hebe subalpina. Evolution 45: 1957-1964.
20. Dommée B, Geslota A, Thompson JD, Reille M, Delelle N. 1999. Androdioecy in the entomophilous tree Fraxinus ornus(Oleaceae). New Phytologist 143: 419-426.
21. Dudle D, Mutikainen P, Delph LF. 2001. Genetics of sex determination in the gynodioecious species Lobelia siphilitica: evidence from two populations. Heredity 86: 265-276.
22. Durand R, Durand B. 1992. Dioecy, monoecy, polyploidy and speciation in annual mercuries. Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 139: 377-399.
23. Godley EJ. 1955. Breeding systems in New Zealand plants. I. Fuchsia. Annuals of Botany (London) NS 19: 549-559.
24. Godley EJ. 1963. Breeding systems in New Zealand plants. 2. Genetics of the sex forms in Fuchsia procumbens. New Zealand Journal of Botany 1: 48-52.
25. Haag ES, Kimble J. 2000. Regulatory elements required for development of C. elegans hermaphrodites are conserved in the tra-2 homologue of C. remanei, a male/female sister species. Genetics 155: 105-116.
26. Humeau L, Pailler T, Thompson JD. 1999. Cryptic dioecy and leaky dioecy in endemic species of Dombeya (Sterculiaceae) on La Réunion. American Journal of Botany 86: 1437-1447.
27. Humeau L, Pailler T, Thompson JD. 2000. Variation in gender and flower-size dimorphism in the dioecious tree Dombeya ciliata, an endemic to La Réunion Island. Biotropica 32: 463-472.
28. Ishida K, Hiura T. 1998. Pollen fertility and flowering phenology in an androdioecious tree, Fraxinus lanuginosa (Oleaceae), in Hokkaido, Japan. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 941-947.
29. Ishida K, Hiura T. 2002. Mating system and population genetic structure of an androdioecious tree, Fraxinus lanuginosa (Oleaceae) in northern Japan. Heredity 88: 296-301.
30. Lewis D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytologist 40: 56-63.
31. Lloyd DG. 1974. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32: 11-34.
32. Lloyd DG. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45: 325-339.
33. Lloyd DG. 1976. The transmission of genes via pollen and ovules in gynodioecious angiosperms. Theoretical and Population Biology 9: 299-316.
34. Lloyd DG. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18: 103-108.
35. Lloyd DG. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhán J, eds. Perspectives in Plant Population Ecology. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer, 277-304.
36. Lloyd DG, Bawa KS. 1984. Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evolutionary Biology 17: 255-338.
37. Maurice S, Belhassen E, Couvet D, Gouyon P-H. 1994. Evolution of dioecy: can nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions select for maleness? Heredity 73: 346-354.
38. Muenchow GE. 1998. Subandrodioecy and male fitness in Sagittaria lancifolia subsp. lancifolia (Alismataceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 513-520.
39. van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. American Naturalist 128: 137-142.
40. Olson MS. 2001. Patterns of fruit production in the subdioecious plant Astilbe biternata(Saxifragaceae). Journal of Ecology 89: 600-607.
41. Olson MS, Antonovics J. 2000. Correlation between male and female reproduction in the subdioecious herb Astilbe biternata (Saxifragaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 837-844.
42. Pannell J. 1997a. Variation in sex ratios and sex allocation in androdioecious Mercurialis annua. Journal of Ecology 85: 57-69.
43. Pannell J. 1997b. Mixed genetic and environmental sex determination in an androdioecious population of Mercurialis annua. Heredity 78: 50-56.
44. Pannell J. 2000. A hypothesis for the evolution of androdioecy: the joint influence of reproductive assurance and local mate competition in a metapopulation. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 195-211.
45. Pannell JR. 2002a. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 397-425.
46. Pannell JR. 2002b. What is functional androdioecy? Functional Ecology 16: 858-869.
47. Ramsey M, Vaughton G. 2001. Sex expression and sexual dimorphism in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 589-597.
48. Rottenberg A. 1998. Sex ratio and gender stability in the dioecious plants of Israel. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 137-148.
49. Sakai AK, Weller SG. 1991. Ecological aspects of sex expression in subdioecious Schiedea globosa (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 1280-1288.
50. Sarkissian TS, Barrett CH, Harder LD. 2001. Gender variation in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): is size all that matters? Ecology 82: 360-373.
51. Sassaman C, Weeks SC. 1993. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the Conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. American Naturalist 141: 314-328.
52. Seger J, Eckhart VM. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 833-841.
53. Taylor DR. 1994. The genetic basis of sex ratio in Silene alba (= S. latifolia). Genetics 136: 641-651.
54. Valiente-Banuet A, Rojas-Martínez A, del Coro Arizmendi M, Dávila P. 1997. Pollination biology of two columnar cacti (Neobuxbaumia mezcalaensis and Neobuxbaumia macrocephala) in the Tehuacan valley, Central Mexico. American Journal of Botany 84: 452-455.
55. Vassiliadis C, Valero M, Saumito-Laprade P, Godelle B. 2000. A model for the evolution of high frequencies of males in an androdioecious plant based on a cross-compatibility advantage of males. Heredity 85: 413-422.
56. Verdú M. 2004. Physiological and reproductive differences between hermaphrodites and males in the androdioecious plant Fraxinus ornus. Oikos 105: 239-246.
57. Verdú M, Montilla AI, Pannell JR. 2004. Paternal effects on functional gender account for cryptic dioecy in a perennial plant. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271: 2017-2023.
58. Wallander E. 2001. Evolution of wind-pollination in Fraxinus (Oleaceae) - an ecophylogenetic approach. PhD thesis. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg University.
59. Webb CJ. 1979. Breeding systems and the evolution of dioecy in New Zealand apioid Umbelliferae. Evolution 33: 662-672.
60. Webb CJ. 1999. Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, eds. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 61-95.
61. Weiblen GD, Oyama RK, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. American Naturalist 155: 46-58.
62. Weller SG, Sakai AK, Wagner WL, Herbst DR. 1990. Evolution of dioecy in Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae) in the Hawaiian Islands: biogeographical and ecological factors. Systematic Botany 15: 266-276.
63. Wolf DE, Takebayashi N. 2004. Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. American Naturalist 163: 122-137.
64. Wolfe LM, Shmida A. 1995. Regulation of gender and flowering behavior in a sexually dimorphic desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus Delile [Resedaceae]). Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 43: 325-337.
65. Wolfe LM, Shmida A. 1997. The ecology of sex expression in a gynodioecious Israeli desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus). Ecology 78: 101-110.
66. Wolf DE, Satkoski JA, White K, Rieseberg LH. 2001. Sex determination in the androdioecious plant Datisca glomerata and its dioecious sister species D. cannabina. Genetics 159: 1243-1257.