On the clinical relevance of mismatch negativity: Results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 112-124

  Groenen, Paul ^a   Snik, Ad ^a   Van Den Brock, Paul ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Cochlear implants; Event related potentials; Mismatch negativity; Neurophysiology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DEAFNESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 0030089565     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000259190     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Naatanen R, Gaillard AWK, Man-lysalo S,: Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Arnst) 1978; 42:313-329.
2. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrel! TD, King C, Tremblay K. Nicol T: Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training. J Cogn Neurosci 1995:7(1): 25-35.
3. Alho K: Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear Hear 1995;16:38-51.
4. Csepe V,: On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995;16:90-103.
5. Kraus N, Micco AG, Koch DB, McGee T, Carrell T, Sharma A, Wiet RJ. Weingarten CZ: The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 1993:65: 118-124.
6. Groenen P, Maassen B, Crul Th, Thoonen G,: The specific relation between perception and production errors for place of articulation in developmental apraxia of speech. J Speech Hear Res 1996, in press.
7. Groenen P, Crul Th, Maassen B, Bon W,: Perception of voicing cues in children with early otitis media with and without language delay. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:43-54.
8. Locke JL: The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child. I. A rationale, some criteria, the conventional tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1980:45:431-444.
9. Picton TW: The neurophysiological evaluation of auditory discrimination. Ear Hear 1995:16:1-6.
10. Naatanen R: The mismatch negativity: A powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 1995:16:6-18.
11. Ford JM, Hillyard SA: Event related potentials, ERPs. to interruptions to steady rhythm. Psychophysiology 1981:18:322-330.
12. Naatanen R, Jiang D, Lavikainen J. Reinikainen K. Paavilainen P: Event-related potentials reveal a memory trace for temporal features. Neuroreport 1993;5:310-312.
13. Nordby H. Roth W. Pfefferbaum A: Event-related potentials to time-deviant and pitch-deviant tones. Psychophysiology 1988:25:249-261.
14. Mantysalo S, Naatanen R: The duration of a neuronal trace of an audi tory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 1987;24:183-195.
15. Bottcher-Gandor C, Ullsperger P: Mismatch negativity in event-related potentials to auditory stimuli as a function of varying interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 1992;29: 546-550.
16. ILS-PC. V6.1: Interactive Laboratory System. Goleta. Signal Technology Inc., 1986.
17. Naatanen R. Paavilainen P. Reinikainen K: Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man? Ncu-rosci Lett 1989;107:347-352.
18. Lang AH, Eerola O. Korpilahti P, Holopainen I, Salo S, Aaltonen O: Practical issues in the clinieal application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995,16:118-130.
19. Kaga K, Kodcra K, Hirota E, Tsuzu-ku T,: P300 response to tones and speech sounds after a cochlear implant: A case report. Laryngoscope 1991:101:905-907.
20. Kileny PR: Use of electrophysio-logic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: Brainstem, middle latency and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol 1991:12:37-42.
21. Oviatt DL. Kileny PR: Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am J Audiol 1991;1:48-55.
22. Groenen P, Makhdoum M, Van den Brink J, Stollman M, Snik A, Van den Brock P: The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996, in press.
23. Micco AG. Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ. Carrell TD, Sharma A, Nicol T, Wiet JR: Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1995;4:514-520.
24. Ponton CW. Don M: The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995:16:131-146.
25. Groenen P, Snik A. Van den Brock P: Auditory evoked responses in two adult cochlear implant users. ASHA 1994:36:206.
26. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell TD, Sharnia A: Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear Hear 1995:16:19-37.
27. Markel JD. Gray AH: Linear Prediction of Speech. Berlin. Springcr-Vcrlag, 1976.
28. Hinderink JB. Brokx JPL. Mens LHM. Van den Broek P: Results from four cochlear implant patients with Usher’s syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994; 103:285-293.
29. Hinderink JB, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Van den Broek P,: Performance of prclingually versus postlingually deaf cochlear implant patients using single-channel or multichannel implants. Laryngoscope 1995:105: 618-622.
30. Bcynon AJ. Brokx JPL. Mens LHM. Van den Broek P: De eerste resulta-ten met een elektrische binnenoor-prothese. Logop Foniatr 1990:62: 113-116.
31. Owens E, Kessler D, Raggio M,: Analysis and revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) battery. Ear Hear 1985:6:280-290.
32. Tyler RS. Preece JP. Lowder MW: The Iowa Cochlear Implant Test Battery. Iowa City: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, 1983.
33. Kraus N, McGee T, Sharma A, Carrel T. Nicol T: Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli. Ear Hear 1992:13: 158-164.
34. Naatanen R, Paavilainen P. Alho K. Rcinikaincn K, Sams M: Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? Neurosci Lett 1989;107:217-221.
35. Kraus N, McGee TJ: Mismatch negativity in the assessment of central auditory function. Am J Audiol 1994:6:39-51.