Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: Speech perception results from 1984 until today

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 509-512

  Krueger, Beate ^a   Joseph, Gert ^a   Rost, Urte ^a   Strauß Schier, Angelika ^a   Lenarz, Thomas ^a   Buechner, Andreas ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Outcome; Performance classes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CHILD; FEMALE; GERMANY; INFANT; LANGUAGE TEST; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE TESTS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 47249119603     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318171972f     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Holmes AE, Kemker FJ, Merwin GE. The effects of varying the number of cochlear implant electrodes on speech perception. Am J Otol 1987;8:240-6.
2. Pijl S. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant. J Otolaryngol 1994;23:286-91.
3. Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Everingham CE, et al. Evaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) in postlinguistically deafened adults. Acta Otolaryngol 1995;115:629-37.
4. Kessler DK. The CLARION multi-strategy cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1999;177:8-16.
5. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Psarros C, Holden TA. Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear Hear 2002;23:207-23.
6. Parkinson AJ, Arcaroli J, Staller SJ, Arndt PL, Cosgriff A, Ebinger K. The Nucleus 24 Contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002;23:41S-8S.
7. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, de Laat JA, Grote JJ. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear Hear 2002;23:184-97.
8. Ostroff JM, David EA, Shipp DB, Chen JM, Nedzelski JM. Evaluation of the high-resolution speech coding strategy for the Clarion CII cochlear implant system. J Otolaryngol 2003;32:81-6.
9. Patrick JF, Busby PA, Gibson PJ. The development of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. Trends Amplif 2006;10: 175-200. Review.
10. Martin LF, TongYC, Clark GM. A multiple-channel cochlear implant. Evaluation using speech tracking. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:157-9.
11. Lehnhardt E, Laszig R. Praxis der Audiometrie. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme, 2000.
12. Hochmair-Desoyer I, Schulz E, Moser L, Schmidt M. The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users. Am J Otol 1998;18:83.
13. Skinner MW, Fourakis MS, Holden TA, Holden LK, Demorest ME. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels. Ear Hear 1996;17:182-97.
14. Skinner MW, Fourakis MS, Holden TA, Holden LK, Demorest ME. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies II. Consonants. Ear Hear 1999;20:443-60.