Epilogue: The journey: From where we started to where we hope to go

International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-88

  Leech, Nancy L ^a   Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958189760     PISSN: 18340806     EISSN: 18340814     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.073     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States, 2008, The Sloan Consortium: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/ survey07.asp
2. Ballard, J. D., & Jensen, V. (Eds) (2007). Teaching qualitative methods: A collection of syllabi and instructional materials (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
3. Baran, M. (2010). Teaching multimethodology research courses to doctoral students. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 19-27.
4. Bazeley, P. (2003). Teaching mixed methods. Qualitative Research Journal 3, 117-126.
5. ~Retrieved January 8, 2010, from http://www. latrobe.edu.au/aqr
6. Bergman, M. (Ed) (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Bryman, A. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration. In J. Brannen, (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 89-111). Aldershot: Avebury Press.
9. Burgess, M. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009, December). A mixed methods framework for utilizing innovative data collection and data analysis strategies for 21st century literacy research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
10. Burnette, D. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching qualitative research: A compendium of model syllabi. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
11. Capraro, R. M., & Thompson, B. (2008). The educational researcher defined: What will future researchers be trained to do? Journal of Educational Research, 101, 247-253.
12. Caverly, D. C., Nicholson, S. A., Battle, J., & Atkins, C. E. (2008). Techtalk: Web 2.0, Blogs, and developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 32(1), 34-35.
13. Chen, H. T. (2006). A theory-driven evaluation perspective on mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 75-83.
14. Chenail, R.J. (2007). Teaching and learning qualitative research references. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/ Teaching.pdf
15. Chenail, R.J. (2009). Teaching and learning qualitative research. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/teaching-052309.pdf
16. Cobb, G. (1993). Reconsidering statistics education: A National Science Foundation Conference. Journal of Statistics Education [On-line serial], 1(1). Retrieved January 8, 2010, from archive@jse.stat.ncsu.edu. Message: send jse/v1n1/cobb.
17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Collins, K. M. T., & O'Cathain, A. (2009). Introduction: Ten points about mixed methods research to be considered by the novice researcher. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 2-7.
19. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (Eds.), (in press). Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping: Mixed methods approaches. The Research on Stress and Coping in Education Series (Vol. 5). Greenway, CT: Information Age Publishing.
20. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Sutton, I. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67-100.
21. Creswell, J. W., & Piano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Creswell, J. W., Tashakkori, A., Jensen, K. D., & Shapley, K. L. (2003). Teaching mixed methods research: Practices, dilemmas, and challenges. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 619-37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 270-283.
24. Derry, S. J., Levin, J. R., Osana, H. P., Jones, M. S., & Peterson, M. (2000). Fostering students' statistical and scientific thinking: Lessons learned from an innovative college course. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 747-773.
25. Earley, M. A. (2007). Developing a syllabus for a mixed methods research course, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10, 145-162.
26. Earley, M. A. (2010). Pedagogical issues in mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie, (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Garfield, J. B. (Ed.). (2005). Innovations in teaching statistics. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
28. Gorard, S., & Smith, E. (Eds.). (2006). Special Issue on 'Combining numbers with narratives'. Evaluation and Research in Education, 19(2). Retrieved January 7, 2010, from http://www. multilingual-matters.net/erie/019/2/
29. Greene, J. C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 93-98.
30. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 7 - 22.
32. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixedmethod evaluation. In J. C. Greene, & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 74, pp. 5-17). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
33. Greenhow, C. M., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246-259.
34. Hammersley, M. (1992). Deconstructing the qualitative - quantitative divide. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 39-55). Aldershot: Avebury Press.
35. Hansson, J. (2010). Program implementation in health services. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 40-48.
36. Houston, S. (2001). Beyond social constructionism: Critical realism and social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 845-861. (Pubitemid 33402738)
37. Hulsizer, M. R., & Woolf, L. M. (2009). Guide to teaching statistics: Innovations and best practices (Teaching Psychological Science). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
38. Hurworth, R. E. (2008). Teaching qualitative research: Cases and issues. Boston, MA: Sense publishers.
39. Ivankova, N., & Stick, S. (2007). Online higher education programs: New challenges, new frontiers, new learning, and new scholarship. In D. Wright, & M. Miller (Eds.), Training higher education policy makers and leaders: A graduate program perspective (pp. 77-97). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing/Greenwood Press.
40. Ivankova, N. V. (2010). Teaching and learning mixed methods research in computer-mediated environment: Challenges and rewards. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 49-65.
41. Johnson, R. B. (2006). Special issue on 'New directions in mixed methods research.' Research in the Schools, 13(1). Retrieved January 6, 2009, from http://www.msera.org/rits-131.htm
42. Johnson, R. B. (2008). Editorial: Living with tensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 202-207.
43. Johnson, R. B. (2009). Toward a more inclusive 'Scientific Research in Education.' Educational Researcher 38, 449-457.
44. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. (Pubitemid 39519587)
46. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.
47. Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research: An introduction and guide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48. Leech, N. L., & Goodwin, L. D. (2008). Building a methodological foundation: Doctoral-level methods courses in colleges of education. Research in the Schools, 15(1), 1-8.
49. Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). 'What a long, strange trip it's been... ': Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 3-9.
50. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51. Lobe, B. (2008). Integration of online research methods. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana.
52. Mallette, K. M. (2008). Long term memory: Attention and retrieval. Unpublished manuscript. Carbondale, IL: Science Fair, Unity Point School.
53. Mallette, K. M. (2009). Long term memory: Episodic and semantic. Unpublished manuscript. Carbondale, IL: Science Fair, Unity Point School.
54. Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51-89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Maxwell, J. A. (2004, April). Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
56. Maxwell, J. A. and Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2003). Critical realism: A way forward for evaluation research in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43, 411-420. (Pubitemid 37255864)
58. McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2006). A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Research in Nursing 11, 66-78.
59. Mertens, D. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformativeemancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Philosophy in mixed methods teaching: The transformative paradigm as illustration. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 9-18.
61. Moore, T. J. (Ed.). (2001). Teaching statistics: Resources for undergraduate instructors. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
62. Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998) Qualitativequantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
64. O'Cathain, A., & Collins, K. M. T (Eds.). (2009). 'Mixed methods for novice researchers' a special issue of International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1) [ISBN 978-1-921348-02-0].
65. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1997). Writing a research proposal: The role of library anxiety, statistics anxiety, and composition anxiety. Library and Information Science Research, 19, 5-33.
66. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2002). Why can't we all get along? Towards a framework for unifying research paradigms. Education, 122, 518-530.
67. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2010). Putting the 'mixed' back into quantitative and qualitative research: Moving towards the 'radical middle.' Unpublished manuscript. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston State University.
68. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Burgess, M. L. (2010). A mixed research framework for utilizing innovative data collection and data analysis strategies. Unpublished manuscript. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston State University.
69. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M. T., & Leech, K. M. T (2010). Bibliography of mixed methodological articles. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston State University.
70. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M. T., & Leech, N. L. (in press). Mixed research: A step-by-step guide. New York: Taylor and Francis.
71. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2010). Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. In Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
73. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). A call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 114-139.
74. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T (in press). A framework for assessing legitimation in mixed research. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology.
75. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2003a). Assessment in statistics courses: More than a tool for evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 115-127.
76. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2003b). Teaching statistics courses: Some important considerations. Academic Exchange Quarterly 7, 319-325.
77. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005a). On becoming a pragmatist researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8, 375-387.
78. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005b). Taking the 'Q' out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 39, 267-296.
79. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T (2008). Interviewing the interpretive researcher: A method for addressing the crises of representation, legitimation, and praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(4), 1-17.
80. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., Murtonen, M., & Tähtinen, J. (2010). Utilizing mixed methods in teaching environments to reduce statistics anxiety. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4 (1), 28-39.
81. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., Slate, J. R., Stark, M., Sharma, B., Frels, R., Harris, K., & Combs, J. P. (2009, February). A model for teaching and learning qualitative research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
82. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). Conducting mixed analyses: A general typology. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 1, 4-17.
83. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T (2009). Mixed data analysis: Advanced integration techniques. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 13-33.
84. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86. Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W (2007). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Pious, S. (2010). Research methods and statistics links by subtopic. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from http://www.socialpsychology.org/methods. htm#onlinetexts
88. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89. Reichardt, C. S., & Cook, T D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T. D. Cook, & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 7-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Rescher, N. (2000). Realistic pragmatism: An introduction to pragmatic philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
91. Ridenour, C. S., & Newman, I. (2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
92. Roberts, A. (2002). A principled complementarity of method: In defence of methodological eclecticism and the qualitative-qualitative debate. The Qualitative Report, 7(3). Retrieved March 28, 2009, from www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/ QR7-3/roberts.html.
93. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94. Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
95. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1992). Generations: The history of America's future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Harper Perennial.
96. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98. Teddlie, C., & Johnson, R. B. (2009). Methodological thought since the 20th century (chap. 4). In C. Teddlie, & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 62-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
101. Wao, H. O., Singh, O., Rich, V., Hohlfeld, T. N., Buckmaster, M., Passmore, D., Tonry, C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2009). The perceived barriers toward reading empirical articles among graduate students: A mixed methods investigation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 9, 70-86.
102. Ware, M. E., & Brewer, C. L. (1999). Handbook for teaching statistics and research methods (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
103. Yanchar, S. C., & Williams, D. D. (2006). Reconsidering the compatibility thesis and eclecticism: Five proposed guidelines for methods use. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 3-12.