"What a long, strange trip it's been...": Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-9

  Lincoln, Yvonna S ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Commensurability; Cumulation of knowledge; Incommensurability; Mixed methods models; Qualitative research history; Rapport

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450250086     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800409349754     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (2006). In the roiling smoke: Qualitative inquiry and contested fields. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 747-756.
2. Bloch, M. (2004). A discourse that disciplines, governs and regulates: The National Research Council's report on scientific research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 96-110.
3. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S.J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York: John Wiley.
4. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Creswell, J.W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95-108.
6. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., & Giardina, M.D. (2006). Disciplining qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 769-782.
8. Dimitriadis, G. (2001). Coming clean at the hyphen: Ethics and dialogue at a local community center. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 578-597.
9. Dobbert, M.L. (1982). Ethnographic research: Theory and application for modern schools and societies. New York: Praeger.
10. Eisenhart, M. (2006). Qualitative science in experimental time. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 697-708.
11. Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphen: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L.M. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. l07-l32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Goetz, J.P., & LeCompte, M.D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Deigo, CA: Academic Press.
14. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
15. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Harding, S., & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds.). (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel.
17. House, E.R. (2005). Qualitative evaluation and changing social policy. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. l069-l082). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Jones, A., & Jenkins, K. (2008). Rethinking collaboration: Working the indigene-colonizer hyphen. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 471-486). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1983). The ethnographic study of scientific work: Towards a constructivist interpretation of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 115-140). London: Sage.
20. Lather, P. (2004). This IS your father's paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 15-34.
21. Lather, P. (2006). Foucauldian scientificity: Rethinking the nexus of qualitative research and educational policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 783-792.
22. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
23. Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.). (1985). Epilogue: Dictionaries For languages not yet spoken. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Organizational theory and inquiry (pp. 221-228). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Lincoln, Y.S., & Cannella, G.S. (2004). Dangerous discourses: Methodological conservatism and governmental regimes of truth. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 5-14.
25. Lincoln, Y.S., & Denzin, N.K. (2008). Epilogue: The lions speak. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methods (pp. 563-571). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. MacLure, M. (2006). The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on baroque method. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 729-746.
27. Marcus, G.E., & Fischer, M.M.J. (1999). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Pinar, W.F. (1988). Whole, bright, deep with understanding: Issues in qualitative research and autobiographical method. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 134-154). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
29. Popkewitz, T.S. (2004). Is the National Research Council committee's report on scientific research in education scientific? On trusting the Manifesto. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 62-78.
30. Preissle, J. (2006). Envisioning qualitative inquiry: A view across four decades. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 685-696.
31. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Schwandt, T. (2006). Opposition redirected. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 803-810.
33. Springwood, C.F., & King, C.R. (2001). Unsettling engagement: On the ends of rapport in critical ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 403-417.
34. St Pierre,E.A., & Roulston, K. (2006). The state of qualitative inquiry. A contested science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 673-684.
35. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Wong, L.M. (1998). The ethics of rapport: Institutional safeguards, resistance, and betrayal. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 178-199.
37. Wright, H.K. (2006). Are we (t)here yet? Qualitative research in education's profuse and contested present. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 793-802.