Conducting mixed analyses: A general typology

International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 4-17

  Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ^a   Slate, John R ^a   Leech, Nancy L ^b   Collins, Kathleen M T ^c  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Concurrent mixed analysis; Data analysis typology; Mixed analysis; Mixed analysis matrix; Mixed research; Parallel mixed analysis; Sequential mixed analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009583603     PISSN: 18340806     EISSN: 18340814     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/mra.455.1.1.4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bazeley P (2003) Computerized data analysis for mixed methods research. In A Tashakkori & C Teddlie (Eds): Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 385-422) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bazeley P (2006) The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analyses. Research in the Schools, 13(1): 64-74.
3. Boatwright J and Slate JR (2000) Work ethic measurement of vocational students in Georgia. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 25(4) Retrieved June 9 2007, from http://scholar.lib.vt. edu/ejournals/JVER/v25n4/boatright.html
4. Bottge BA, Heinrichs M, Mehta ZD and Hung Y (2002) Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 35: 186-200.
5. Bryman A (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1): 97-113.
6. Caracelli VW and Greene JC (1993) Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15: 195-207.
7. Chi MTH (1997) Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6:271-315.
8. Collins KMT, Onwuegbuzie AJ and Jiao QG (2007) A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1: 267-294.
9. Collins KMT, Onwuegbuzie AJ and Sutton IL (2006) A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4:67-100.
10. Creswell JW, Shope R, Plano Clark VL and Green DO (2006) How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1): 1-11.
11. Gorard S and Smith E (Eds) (2006) Combining numbers with narratives [Special issue]. Evaluation and Research in Education, 19: 59
12. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ and Graham WF (1989) Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11:255-274.
13. Johnson RB and Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7): 14-26.
14. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ and Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1:112-133.
15. Li S, Marquart JM and Zercher C (2000) Conceptual issues and analytical strategies in mixed-method studies of preschool inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 23: 116-132.
16. Luck L, Jackson D and Usher K (2007) Innocent or culpable? Meanings that emergency department nurses ascribe to individual acts of violence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, doi: 10.1111/1365-2702.2006.9870.x
17. Mactavish JB and Schleien SJ (2000) Beyond qualitative and quantitative data linking: An example from a mixed method study of family recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 34: 154-163
18. Mactavish JB and Schleien SJ (2004, February) Reinjecting spontaneity and balance in family life: Parents’ perspectives on recreation in familes that include children with developmental disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48: 123-141.
19. Maeda H (2006) Elements and degrees of SI: A case study of Nikkei Brazilian immigrants in Japan. Educational Research, Policy, and Practice, 5: 195-210
20. McVea K, Crabtree BF, Medder JD, Susman JL, Lukas L, Mcllvain HE, Davis CM, Gilbert CS and Hawver M (1996) An ounce of prevention? Evaluation of ‘Put Prevention into Practice’ program. Journal of Family Practitioners, 43: 361-369.
21. Morse J (1991) Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40:120-123.
22. Morse J (2003) Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral Research (pp. 189-208) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. National Science Foundation (2002) The 2002 User Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. Retrieved on April 24 2007, from http://www. nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf 02057_1.pdf
24. O’Cathain A, Nicholl J, Sampson F, Walters S, McDonnell A and Munro J (2004) Do different types of nurses give different triage decisions in NHS Direct? A mixed methods study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 9:226-233.
25. Onwuegbuzie AJ (2003) Effect sizes in qualitative research: A prolegomenon. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 37:393-409.
26. Onwuegbuzie AJ and DaRos-Voseles DA (2001) The role of cooperative learning in research methodology courses: A mixed-methods analysis. Research in the Schools, 8(1): 61-75.
27. Onwuegbuzie AJ and Leech NL (2004) Enhancing the interpretation of ‘significant’ findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9, 770-792. From http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR9-4/onwuegbuzie.pdf
28. Onwuegbuzie AJ and Leech NL (2006) Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11, 474- 498. Retrieved March 11 2007, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR113/onwuegbuzie.pdf
29. Onwuegbuzie AJ and Teddlie C (2003) A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A Tashakkori & C Teddlie (Eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Witcher AE, Collins KMT, Filer JD, Wiedmaier W.and Moore CW (2007) Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed methods analysis. American Educational Research Journal 44:113-160.
31. Parkhurst PE, Lovell KL, Sprafka SA and Hodgins M (1972) Evaluation of videodisc modules: A mixed methods approach. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348014)
32. Sandelowski M (2000) Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing Health, 23:246-255.
33. Sandelowski M (2001) Real qualitative researchers don’t count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 24: 230-240.
34. Sandelowski M and Barroso J (2003) Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research, 52:226-233.
35. Tashakkori A and Teddlie C (1998) Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 46) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Tashakkori A and Teddlie C (Eds) (2003a) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research pp. 671-7014 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Tashakkori A and Teddlie C (2003b) The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A Tashakkori & C Teddlie (Eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research pp. 671-7014 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Teddlie C and Stringfield S (1993) Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
39. Teddlie C and Tashakkori A (2003) Major issues and controversies in the use mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A Tashakkori & C Teddlie (Eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research pp. 3-504 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Teddlie C and Tashakkori A (2006) A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1): 12-28.
41. Wang, J, Gibson AM, Salinas L, Solis F and Slate JR (2007) Thematic differences in mission statements between four-year public institutions and two-year colleges in Texas. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 11. Retrieved on April 23 2007, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/-iejll
42. Vogt WP (1999) Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences (2nd edn) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Yanchar SC and Williams DD (2006) Reconsidering the compatibility thesis and eclecticism: Five proposed guidelines for methods use. Educational Researcher, 35(9): 3-12.
44. Yin RK (2006) Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13(1): 41-47. Received 10 June 2007 Accepted 12 September 2007