Philosophy in mixed methods teaching: The transformative paradigm as illustration

International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 9-18

  Mertens, Donna M ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mixed methods; Philosophy of science; Social justice; Teaching research; Transformative paradigm; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954899810     PISSN: 18340806     EISSN: 18340814     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/mra.2010.4.1.009     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Washington, DC.
2. Barnes, C. (2009). An ethical agenda in disability research: Rhetoric or reality. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 458-473). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bawden, R. (2006). A systemic evaluation of an agricultural development: A focus on the worldview challenge. In B. Williams & I. Iman (Eds.), Systems concepts in evaluation (pp. 35-46). Point Reyes, CA: Edge Press of Inverness.
4. Bernai, D. D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 555-582.
5. Brabeck, M. M., & Brabeck, K. M. (2009). Feminist perspectives on research ethics. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 39-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Brown, B. L., & Hedges, D. (2009). Use and misuse of quantitative methods: Data collection, calculation, and presentation. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 373-386). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Chilisa, B. (2005). Educational research in post-colonial Africa: A critique of HIV/AIDS research in Botswana. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 659-684.
8. Chilisa, B. (2009a). Indigenous African-centered ethics: Contesting and complementing dominant models. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 407-425). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Chilisa, B. (2009b, September 21). Partnership for capacity-building for HIV/STD prevention for Botswana Adolescents. Executive Advisory Board Meeting, Gabrone, Botswana.
10. Christians, C. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 139-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Cram, F. (2009). Maintaining indigenous voices. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 308-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Cram, F., Ormond, A., & Carter, L. (2004, July). Researching our relations: Reflections on ethics and marginalization. Paper presented at the Kamehauneha Schools 2004 Research Conference on Hawaiian Well-being, Kea'au, HI.
13. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dillard, C. (2000). The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 661-681.
16. Ginsberg, P. E., & Mertens, D. M. (2009). Frontiers in social research ethics: Fertile ground for evolution. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 580-612). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed.) (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26.
20. Kendall, F. E. (2006). Understanding white privilege. New York: Routledge.
21. Kirkhart, K. (2005). Through a cultural lens: Reflection on validity and theory in evaluation. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context (pp. 21-38). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
22. Kuhn, T. (1962). Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35 (7), 7-12.
24. LaFrance, J., & Crazy Bull, C. (2009). Researching ourselves back to life: Taking control of the research agenda in Indian country. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 135-149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford.
27. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Mertens, D. M., Holmes, H., & Harris, H. (2009). Transformative research and ethics. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 85-102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Moewaka Barnes, H., McCreanor, T., Edwards, S., & Borell, B. (2009). Epistemological domination: Social science research ethics in Aotearoa. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 442-457). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (DHEW Publication No. 0S 78-0012). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
31. Ponterotto, J. G., & Grieger, I. (2007). Effectively communicating qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 404-430.
32. SenGupta, S., Hopson, R., & ThompsonRobinson, M. (Eds.) (2004). In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Smith, L. T. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 85-108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Sullivan, M. (2009). Philosophy, ethics, and the disability community. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 69-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Symonette, H. (2009). Cultivating self as responsive instrument: Working the boundaries and borderlands for ethical border crossings. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 279-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Teddlie, C., &: Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.