Examining the roles of blended learning approaches in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments: A delphi study

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 189-200

  So, Hyo Jeong ^a   Bonk, Curtis J ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Computer supported collaborative learning; Delphi study; E learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958122712     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).
2. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
3. Boyle, T. (2005). A dynamic, systemic method for developing blended learning. Education, Communication & Information, 5(3), 221-232.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2002). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DD: National Academy Press.
5. Brescia, W. F., & Miller, M. T. (2006). What's it worth? The perceived benefits of instructional blogging. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5, 44-52.
6. Brill, J. M., Bishop, M. J., & Walker, A. E. (2006). The competencies and characteristics required of an effective project manager: A web-based Delphi study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(2), 115-140.
7. Buss, A. R. (2001). A Delphi study of educational telecollaborative projects: Identifying critical elements and obstacles. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(3), 235-248.
8. Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-386.
9. Clouder, L., Dalley, J., Hargreaves, J., Parkes, S., Sellars, J., & Toms, J. (2006). Electronic [re]constitution of groups: Group dynamics from face-to-face to an online setting. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 467-480.
10. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Company.
11. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O'Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: Conceptions, intentions, and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 244-256.
12. Faherty, V. (1979). Continuing social work education: Results of a Delphi survey. Journal of Education for Social Work, 15(1), 12-19.
13. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
14. Herring, M. C. (2004). Development of constructivist-based distance learning environments: A knowledge base for K-12 teachers. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(4), 231-242.
15. Holden, M. C., & Wedman, J. F. (1993). Future issues of computer-mediated communication: The results of a Delphi Study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 41(4), 5-24.
16. Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2002, Boulder, CO.
17. Koschmann, T., Zemel, A., Conlee-Stevens, M., Young, N., Robbs, J., & Barnhart, A. (2005). How do people learn: Member's methods and communicative mediation. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computermediated knowledge communication (and how they may be overcome) (pp. 265-294). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.
18. Kramer, B. S., Walker, A. E., & Brill, J. M. (2007). The underutilization of information and communication technology-assisted collaborative project-based learning among international educators: A Delphi study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55, 527-543.
19. Listone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method techniques and applications. London: Addison-Wesley.
20. Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2008). Face-to-face contact at the midpoint of an online collaboration: Its impact on the patterns of participation, interaction, affect, and behavior over time. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1540-1557.
21. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139-178.
22. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.
23. Pollard, C., & Pollard, R. (2004-2005). Research priorities in educational technology: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 145-160.
24. Seaman, J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset volume II: The paradox of faculty voices. Retrieved September 16, 2009, from http://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=1879.
25. So, H. J. (2009). When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: Collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 143-160.
26. Soo, K. S., & Bonk, C. J. (1998). Interaction: What does it mean in online distance education? Paper presented at the Ed-Media & Ed-Telecom 98.
27. Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315-337.
28. Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (1995). Computer based Delphi processes. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (Vol. 55-88). London: Kingsley Publishers.
29. Tyler-Smith, K. (2006). Early attrition among first time eLearners: A review of factors that contribute to drop-out, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking eLearning programmes. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Retrieved September 16, 2009, from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol2_No2_TylerSmith.htm
30. Wilhelm, W. J. (2001). Alchemy of the oracle: The Delphi technique. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 43(1), 6-26.
31. Williams, D. L., Boone, R., & Kingsley, K. L. (2004). Teacher beliefs about educational software: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 213-229.
32. Yang, Y. N. (2000). Convergence on the guidelines for designing a Web-based art-teacher education curriculum: A Delphi study. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association