Teacher beliefs about educational software: A delphi study

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 213-229

  Williams, Diana L ^a   Kingsley, Randall Boone Karla V ^b  

^a ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008756616     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782413     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barnette, J, Danielson, L, & Algozzine, R. (1978). Delphi methodology: An empirical investigation. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(1), 66-73.
2. Barrett, E. (1993). Collaboration in the electronic classroom (computer education). Technology-Review, 96(2), 50-56.
3. Benson, S. J. (2000) Technology integration: An indepth, reflective position paper. Retrieved June 23, 2003 from http://pt3.nmsu.edu/educ621/sharon4.html
4. Boone, R., Higgins, K., & Williams, D. (1997). Supporting content area instruction with videodiscs and multimedia technologies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32(5), 302-311.
5. Char, C. (1990). Interactive technology and the young child: Insights from research and design. Center for Learning Technology Reports and Papers in Progress, report No.90-2). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 152)
6. Crosier, J., Cobb, S., & Wilson, J. (2002). Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science. Computers & Education, 38, 77-94.
7. Cuban, L. (2001). Why are most teachers infrequent and restrained users of computers in their classrooms? In J. Woodward & L. Cuban, (Eds.), Technology, curriculum and professional development, (pp. 121-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
8. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990) The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.), Glenview, IL: Harper Collins.
9. DiSessa A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Drake, S. A. (2000). Problems with technology integration, Retrieved June 23, 2003 from_http://pt3/nmsu.edu/educ621 /scott3.html
11. Elliott, A., & Hall, N. (1997). The impact of self-regulatory teaching strategies on “at-risk” preschoolers’ mathematical learning in a computer-mediated environment. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 5(2/3), 187-198.
12. Fleming, M., & Levie, W. (1993). Instructional message design principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
13. Forcier, R. (1999). The computer as an educational toolproductivity andproblem solving (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. London: Fontana.
15. Hannafin, M. J., & Hill, J. R. (2002). Epistemology and the design of learning environments. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 70-82). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
16. Haugland, S. W., & Shade, D. (1994). Early childhood computer software. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 5(1), 83-92.
17. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
18. Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Williams, D. (2000). A framework for the evaluation of educational software for use in special education. Intervention in School & Clinic, 36(2), 109-115.
19. Hiltz, S., & Turoff, M. (1993). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Hinostroza, J. E., & Mellar, H. (2001). Pedagogy embedded in educational software design: Report of a case study. Computers & Education, 37, 27-40.
21. Jeffries, S. (2000). An investigation into teacher education faculty technology usage. Retrieved June 22, 2003 from New Mexico State University’s Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers Today (PT3) Web site: http://pt3.nmsu.edu/educ621/stevel.html
22. Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2000). Models of teaching (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Kelley, L, & Ringstaff, C. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment: A review of findings from research. San Francisco: WestEd.
24. Lockard, J., Abrams, P. D., & Many, W. A. (1997). Microcomputers for twenty- first century educators. New York: Longman.
25. Matthews, A. (2002). Technology leadership at a junior high school: A qualitative case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
26. Means, B., & Golan, S. (1998). Transforming teaching and learning with multimedia technology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
27. McKenzie, J. (2003). The technology presumption: Could integrating technology sometimes be wrong-minded? From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, 12(9). Retrieved June 24, 2003 from http://www.fno.org/may03/wrongminded.html
28. Merrill, D.M. (2002). Instructional goals and learning styles: Which takes precedence? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in in-structional design and technology (pp. 99-106). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
29. Mills, R.J. (2001). Analyzing instructional software using a computer-tracking system. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 21-30.
30. Nations, C. (2000a). Technology integration: Challenges and opportunities. Retrieved June 23, 2003 from New Mexico State University’s Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers Today (PT3) Web site: http://pt3.nmsu.edu/educ621/cynthia4.html
31. Nations, C. (2000b). Providing effective technology leadership. Retrieved June 23, 2003 from New Mexico State University’s Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers Today (PT3) Web site: http://pt3.nmsu.edu/educ621/cynthia2.html
32. Newby, T., Stepich, D., Lehman, J., & Russell, J. (2000). Instructional technology for teaching and learning: Designing instruction, integrating computers, and using media, (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Pastor, E., & Kerns, E. (1997). A digital snapshot of an early childhood classroom. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 42-45.
34. Perkins, D. (1995). Software goes to school: teaching understanding with new technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Poole, B. (1995). Education for an information age: teaching in the computerized classroom. Dubuque, IA: Brown and Benchmark.
36. Richey, R., & Morrison, G. (2002). Instructional design in business and industry. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 197-210). Upper Saddle River. NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
37. Ricketts, R. (1985). Categorizing tricounty K—12 computer education course goals by means of a delphi process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
38. Roblyer, M. (1991). Electronic hands across the ocean: The Florida-England connection. The Computing Teacher, 19(5), 16-19.
39. Roblyer, M. D., Edwards, J., & Havriluk, M. A. (1997.1. Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
40. Rosenberg, R. (1997). The Social impact of computers. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41. Sandkoltz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Shade, D. (1996). Software evaluation. Young Children, 51(6), 17-21.
43. Shelly, G., Cashman, T., Gunter, R., & Gunter, G. (2002). Integratring technology in the classroom, (2nd. Ed.). Boston: Course Technology.
44. Shiratuddin, N., & Landoni, M. (2002). Evaluation of content activities in children’s educational software. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 175-182.
45. Sim, Y. (1977). Identifying the future roles of the library at the community college: A delphi study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 163 945)
46. Skinner, R. (2002, May 9). Tracking tech trends. Retrieved June 28, 2002 from http:/Avww.edweek.org/sreports/tc02/article.cfm?slug=3 5 tracking. h21
47. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College.
48. Sugar, W. A. (2001). What is so good about user-centered design? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on novice software designers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 235-250.
49. Tiu, E, Guglielmi, J., & Walton, G. (2002, June). Assessing a technology initiative: Lessons learned while integrating technology into teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Annual International Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Canada.