Electronic [re]constitution of groups: Group dynamics from face-to-face to an online setting

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 467-480

  Clouder, Lynn ^a   Dalley, Jayne ^a   Hargreaves, Julian ^a   Parkes, Sally ^a   Sellars, Julie ^a   Toms, Jane ^a  

^a Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Group dynamics; Online discussion forums

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845485039     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-006-9002-0     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adair, J. (1986). Effective teambuilding: How to make a winning team. London, UK: Pan.
2. Alpay, E. (2005). Group dynamic processes in email groups. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(1), 7-16.
3. Althaus, S. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158-174.
4. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
5. Beuchot, A., & Bullen, M. (2005). Interaction and interpersonality in online discussion forums. Distance Education, 26(1), 67-87.
6. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University.
7. Breakwell, G. M., Hammond, S., Fife-Schaw, C., & Smith J. A. (Eds.). (2006). Research methods in psychology (3rd Ed.). London: Sage.
8. Brookfield, S. (1986) Understanding and facilitating adult learning. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
9. Brookfield, S. (1990). Using critical incidents to explore learners' assumptions. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 177-193). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Caporel, L. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1991). Reviving evolutionary psychology: Biology meets society. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 187-195.
11. Clouder, D. L., & Deepwell, F. (2004). Reflections on unexpected outcomes: Learning from student collaboration in an online discussion forum. Proceedings of networked learning conference 2004 (pp. 429-435). Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
12. Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing action research in your own organisation. London, UK: Sage.
13. Cramphorn, C. (2004). An evaluation of formal and underlying factors influencing student participation within e-learning web discussion forums. Proceedings of networked learning conference 2004 (pp. 417-423). Lancaster, UK: University of Lancaster.
14. Davis, M., & Denning, K. (2000). Online learning: Frontiers in the creation of learning communities. In Proceedings of networked learning conference 2000 (pp. 78-85). Lancaster, UK: University of Lancaster.
15. Di Giacomo, M., & Adamson, B. J. (2001). Coping with stress in the workplace: Implications for new health professionals. Journal of Allied Health, 30, 106-111.
16. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
17. Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: International Thompson Publishing Company.
18. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 1-14.
19. Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41-61.
20. Hauschildt, P. M., & McMahon, S. I. (1996). Reconceptualising "resistant" learners and rethinking instruction: Risking a trip to the swamp. Language Arts, 73, 576-586.
21. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. S. (2004). The bystander effect: A lens for understanding patterns of participation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 165-195.
24. Jewell, V. (2005). Continuing the classroom community: Suggestions for using online discussion boards. English Journal, 94(4), 83-87.
25. Lindquist, B. (1994). Beyond student resistance: A pedagogy of possibility. Teaching Education, 6 (2), 1-8.
26. McConnell, D. (2005). Examining the dynamics of networked e-learning groups and communities. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 25-42.
27. Murphy, E. (2004). Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421-431.
28. Oren, A., Mioduser, D., & Nachmias, R. (2002). The development of social climate in virtual learning discussion groups. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Available at http://www.irrodl.org/ content/v3.1/mioduser.html [Accessed 18 April 2005].
29. Quinney, A. (2005). Placements online: Student experiences of a website to support learning in practice settings. Social Work Education, 24(4), 439-450.
30. Revans, R. (1998). ABC of action learning. London, UK: Lemos and Crane.
31. Rovai, A. A. P. (2002). A preliminary look at the sturctural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, (5(1). Available at http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_rovai.asp [Accessed on 4th February 2005].
32. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London, UK: Kogan Page.
33. Seepersad, S. (2004). Coping with loneliness: Adolescent online and offline behaviour. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 7(1), 35-39.
34. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
35. Spoor, J. R., & Kelly, J. R. (2004). The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 398-412.
36. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1995). Computers, networks and work. Scientific American, (Special issue: The Computer in the 21st Century), 6, 128-139.
37. Tanner, K. J. (2005). Emotion, gender and the sustainabilily of communities. The Journal of Community Informatics 1(2). Available at http://www.ci-journal.net/viewarticle.php?id=45&layout=html (Accessed on 18th May 2005)
38. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
39. Tubbs, S. L., & Moss, S. (2003). Human communication: Principles and contexts (9th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-91.
41. Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, .2(1), 34-49.
42. Wooster, D. (2004). An exploratory study of web-based supports for occupational therapy students during level II fieldwork. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 18(1-2), 21-29.
43. Zhu, E. (1998). Learning and mentoring: Electronic discussions in a distance learning course. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centred technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse (pp. 150-183). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.