Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 126-141

  Anderson, Terry ^a  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042693166     PISSN: 14923831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Adria, M. and Woudstra, A. (2001). Who's on the line? Managing student communications in distance learning using a one-window approach. Open Learning, 16(3), 249-261.
2. Anderson, T. and Garrison, D.R. (1995). Transactional issues in distance education: The impact of design in audio teleconferencing. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 27-45.
3. Anderson, T. and Garrison, D.R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance Learners in Higher Education. (pp. 97-112). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
4. Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education. (pp. 129-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Archer, W. Garrison, D.R. and Anderson, T. (1999). Adopting disruptive technologies in traditional universities: Continuing education as an incubator for innovation. Canadian Journal for University Continuing Education 25(1), 13-30. Retrieved July 15, 2003: http://www.extension.usask.ca/cjuce/articles/ v25pdf/2511.pdf
6. Bates, A. (1990). Interactivity as a Criterion for Media Selection in Distance Education. Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities. ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED329245
7. Berners-Lee, T. (1998). Realizing the Full Potential of the Web. World-Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved April 3, 2003: http://www.w3.org/1998/02/ Potential.html
8. Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor. San Francisco: Harper.
9. Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
10. Coldeway, D. (1991). Patterns of behaviour in individualized distance education courses. Research in Distance Education, 3(4), 6-10.
11. Collis, B. and Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world. London: Kogan Page.
12. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.
13. Daniel, J. and Marquis, C. (1979). Interaction and independence: Getting the mixture right. Teaching at a Distance, 15, 25-44.
14. Daniel, J. and Marquis, C. (1988). Interaction and independence: Getting the mix right. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, and B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance Education: International Perspectives. (pp. 339-359). London: Routledge.
15. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan. Retrieved May 21, 2001: http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/projects/digitexts/dewey/d_e/ contents.html
16. Fulford, C.P. and Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
17. Garrison, D.R. and Shale, D. (1990). A new framework and perspective. In D. R. Garrison and D. Shale (Eds.), Education at a distance: from issues to practice. (pp. 123-133). Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
18. Garrison, D.R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1) Retrieved May 21, 2001: http://www.irrodl.org/content/v1.1/randy.pdf
19. Garrison, R. Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2(2), 87-105. Retrieved July 15, 2003: http://www.atl. ualberta.ca/cmc/CTinTextEnvFinal.pdf
20. Garrison, D.R. Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence." Retrieved July 15, 2003: www.atl.ualberta.ca/cmc/CogPresPaper_June30_.pdf
21. Greer, J. McCalla, G. Vassileva, J. Deters, R. Bull, S. and Kettel, L. (2001). Lessons learned in deploying a multi-agent learning support system: The I-Help experience. AIED. Retrieved April2, 2003: http://julita.usask.ca/Texte/ Aied01-camera.pdf
22. Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. London: Routledge.
23. Jaspers, F. (1991). Interactivity or instruction? A reaction to Merrill. Educational Technology, 31(3), 21-24.
24. Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31(10), 28-33.
25. Juler, P. (1990). Promoting interaction; maintaining independence: Swallowing the mixture. Open Learning, 5(2), 24-33.
26. Kirby, D. and Boak, C. (1987). Developing a system for audio-teleconferencing analysis. Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), 31-42.
27. Kirkup, G. and von Prummer, C. (1990). Support and connectedness: The needs of women distance education students. Journal of Distance Education, 5(2), 9-31. Retrieved April l2, 2003: http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol5.2/ 7_kirkup_and_von_prummer.html
28. Kozma, R. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 7-19.
29. Kramarae, C. (2003). Gender equity online, when there is no door to knock on. In D. Moore and W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education. (pp. 261-272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines. New York: Penguin Group.
31. Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Laurillard, D. (1997). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
33. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Litzinger, M. E. Carr, A. A. and Marra, R. (1997). Constructivism, Feminism, and Systemic Change: Finding Common Ground. Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, Albuquerque, NM.
35. May, S. (1993). Collaborative learning: More is not necessarily better. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 39-49.
36. McCrosky, J. and Richmond, V.P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In Richmond V. P. and J. McCrosky (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern. (pp. 200-211).
37. Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
38. Parker, L. and Olgren C. (1980). Teleconferencing and interactive media. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin - Extension Press.
39. Potter, J. (1998). Beyond Access: Student perspective on support service needs in distance education. The Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation permanante universitaire, 24(1) Retrieved October 15, 2002: http://www.extension.usask.ca/cjuce/articles/ v24pdf/2413.pdf
40. Roberts, J. (1998). Compressed video learning: Creating active learners. Montreal: Cheneliere/McGraw-Hill.
41. Rourke, L. Anderson, T. Garrison, D.R. and Archer, W. (2001). Methodolgical issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12. Retrieved July 15, 2003: http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/cmc/2Rourke_et_al_Content_Analysis.pdf
42. Rourke, L. and Anderson, T. (2002). Using peer teams to lead online discussions. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1. Retrieved July 15, 2003: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2002/1/rourke-anderson-02-1-01.html
43. Russell, T. (2000). The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Retrieved Nov. 22, 2000: http://cuda.teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantdifference/
44. Saba, F. and Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59.
45. Seels, B. (1997). Theory development in educational/instructional technology. Education Technology, 37(1), 3-5.
46. Sims, R. (1999). Interactivity on stage: Strategies for learner-designer communication. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 257-272. Retrieved May 25, 2002: http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/ajet/ajet15/sims.html
47. Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
48. Sutton, L. (2001). The principles of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. Journal of Interactive Educational Communications, 7(3), 223-242. Retrieved July 15, 2003: http://www.eas.asu.edu/ elearn/research/suttonnew.pdf
49. Turoff, M. (1997). Alternative futures for distance learning: The force and the darkside. Virtual Learning Environments and the Role of the Teacher. UNESCO/Open University. Retrieved April 2, 2003: http://eies.njit.edu/~turoff/ Papers/darkaln.html
50. Wagner, E.D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-26.
51. Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-orientated technologies. (1.3 Ed.). Shareware. Retrieved Mar 12, 2003: http://www.ewenger.com/tech/
52. Wilson, B. (1997). Thoughts on theory in educational technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 22-26.