Research priorities in educational technology: A Delphi study

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 145-160

  Pollard, Constance ^a   Pollard, Richard ^b  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning; Models; Research priorities; Strategies; Teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008810845     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782430     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (2003). e-Research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Cope, R. W. (1981). Education 1990: A delphi study of possible future problems or issues for public education in Missouri (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, 1981). Dissertation Abstract International, 43(06), 1761A.
3. Culp, K. M., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2003). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy. Washington, DC: Education Development Center for Children and Technology. Available: http://www.nationaledtechplan.org/docs_and_pdf/20yearsdocrevised.pdf
4. Cyphert, F., & Gant, W. (1971). The delphi technique: A case study. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 272-273.
5. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
6. Fouts, J. T. (2000). Research on computers and education: Past, present and future. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Available: http://www.esdl89.org/tlp/images/To talReport3.pdf
7. Honey, M., Culp, K., & Carrigg, F. (2000). Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and present, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 5-14.
8. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies o findings on computerized instruction. In E. Baker & H. O’Neil (Eds). Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9-33). HiLsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1978). The delphi method. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
10. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Teachers’ tools jor the 21“ century: A report on teachers’ use of technology NCES 2000-102. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000102
11. Roblyer, M. D. (1988). The effectiveness of microcomputers in education: A review of the research from 1980-1987. Technological Horizons in Education, 16(2), 85-89.
12. Schacter, J. (2001). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology. Available online at http://www.mff.org/pubs/MEl6l.pdf
13. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). The national technology education plan. e-Learning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/reports/e-learning.pdf
14. 3). Available: http://www.ed.gov/programs/teachtech/index.html
15. Van de Ven, A. L., & Delbecq, A.H. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4), 605-621.
16. Waxman, H.C., Connell, M. & Gray, J. (2002). A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. North Central Regional Education Laboratory. Available: http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects/