Reproducibility of ocular response analyzer measurements and their correlation with central corneal thickness

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 248, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1617-1622

  Wasielica Poslednik, Joanna ^a   Berisha, Fatmire ^a   Aliyeva, Shakhsanam ^a   Pfeiffer, Norbert ^a   Hoffmann, Esther M ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central corneal thickness; Corneal hysteresis; Ocular response analyzer; Reproducibility; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL COMPENSATED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TONOMETER; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77957655876     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1471-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. AL Coleman S Miglior 2008 Risk factors for glaucoma onset and progression Surv Ophthalmol 53 Suppl1 S3 S10 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.006 19038621
2. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish II RK, Wilson MR, Kass MA, for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group 2002 The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 120 714 720
3. MC Leske M Hussein B Bengtsson L Hyman E Komaroff Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group 2003 Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Arch Ophthalmol 121 1 48 56 12523884
4. MA Kass DK Heuer EJ Higginbotham CA Johnson JL Keltner JP Miller RK Parrish 2nd MR Wilson MO Gordon 2002 The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 120 6 701 713 12049574
5. J Liu CJ Roberts 2005 Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis J Cataract Refract Surg 31 1 146 155 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031 15721707
6. DA Luce 2005 Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer J Cataract Refract Surg 31 1 156 162 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044 15721708
7. MM Whitacre R Stein 1993 Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers Surv Ophthalmol 38 1 1 30 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FlsVWlsw%3D%3D 10.1016/0039-6257(93)90053-A 8235993
8. V Berry SM Drance RL Wiggins M Schulzer 1966 A study of the errors of applanation tonometry and tonography on two groups of normal people Can J Ophthalmol 1 3 213 220 1:STN:280:DyaF2s%2Fgslejsg%3D%3D 5914352
9. NG Congdon AT Broman K Bandeen-Roche D Grover HA Quigley 2006 Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage Am J Ophthalmol 141 868 875 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.007 16527231
10. BA Francis A Hsieh MY Lai V Chopra F Pena S Azen R Varma 2007 Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry Ophthalmology 114 1 20 26 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.047 17070592
11. AG Boehm A Weber LE Pillunat R Koch E Spoerl 2008 Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 6 2472 2477 10.1167/iovs.07-1366
12. L Barleon EM Hoffmann M Berres N Pfeiffer FH Grus 2006 Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects Am J Ophthalmol 142 4 583 590 10.1016/j.ajo.2006. 05.030 17011849
13. A Pelit R Altan-Yaycioglu A Pelit YA Akova 2009 Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects Clin Exp Optom 92 1 14 18 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00299.x 18637107
14. YC Ko CJ Liu WM Hsu 2005 Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers Eye (Lond) 19 3 327 332
15. S Shah M Laiquzzaman I Cunliffe S Mantry 2006 The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes Cont Lens Anterior Eye 29 5 257 262 10.1016/j.clae.2006.09.006 17085066
16. J Moreno-Montanes MJ Maldonado N Garcia L Mendiluce PJ Garcia-Gomez M Segui-Gomez 2008 Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 3 968 974 10.1167/iovs.07-0280
17. FA Medeiros RB Weinreb 2006 Evaluation of the Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on the intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyzer J Glaucoma 15 364 370 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212268.42606. 97 16988597
18. JR Landis GG Koch 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 321 325
19. I Stalmans A Harris V Vanbellinghen T Zeyen B Siesky 2008 Ocular pulse amplitude in normal tension and primary open angle glaucoma J Glaucoma 17 5 403 407 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c5f2c 18703952
20. M Kynigopoulos T Schlote A Kotecha A Tzamalis B Pajic I Haefliger 2008 Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 225 5 357 360 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3ptlKjsA%3D%3D 10.1055/s-2008-1027256 18454372
21. B Oncel UA Dinc E Gorgun BI Yalvaç 2009 Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subject Eur J Ophthalmol 19 5 798 803 19787600
22. S Shah M Laiquzzaman I Yeung X Pan C Roberts 2009 The use of the Ocular Response Analyser to determine corneal hysteresis in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery Cont Lens Anterior Eye 32 3 123 128 10.1016/j.clae.2009.02.005 19321376
23. N Ehlers T Branson S Sperling 1975 Applanation tonometrie and corneal thickness Acta Ophthalmol 53 34 43 1:STN:280:DyaE2M7gsFyqsw%3D%3D
24. M Iester M Mete M Figus P Frezzotti 2009 Incorporating corneal pachymetry into the management of glaucoma J Cataract Refract Surg 35 9 1623 1628 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.015 19683164
25. MJ Doughty ML Zaman 2000 Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach Surv Ophthalmol 44 5 367 408 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3gtVKmtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0039-6257(00) 00110-7 10734239
26. MO Gordon JA Beiser JD Brandt DK Heuer EJ Higginbotham CA Johnson JL Keltner JP Miller RK Parrish 2nd MR Wilson MA Kass 2002 The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 120 6 714 720 12049575
27. M Sullivan-Mee G Gerhardt KD Halverson C Qualls 2009 Repeatibility and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry J Glaucoma 18 9 666 673 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31819c487d 20010245
28. JM Martinez-de-la-Casa J Garcia-Feijoo A Fernandez-Vidal C Mendez-Hernandez J Garcia-Sanchez 2006 Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 10 4410 4414 10.1167/iovs.06-0158