Automatic, context-specific generation of Gene Ontology slims

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Davis, Melissa J ^a   Sehgal, Muhammad S B ^a,b   Ragan, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATED DATASETS; BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGIES; CREATION PROCESS; DATA-DRIVEN ALGORITHM; EFFICIENCY OF USE; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING; RESEARCH DOMAINS;

SEMANTICS;

GENES;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENOME; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENOME; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 77957334901     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-498     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. GeneOntologyConsortium The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Research 2003, (32 Database):D258-D261. GeneOntologyConsortium.
2. Wilson RJ, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, Gelbart W, Bitsoi L, Crosby M, Dirkmaat A, Emmert D, Gramates L, Falls K, et al. FlyBase: Integration and improvements to query tools. Nucleic Acids Research 2008, (36 Database):D588-D593. 2238994, 18160408.
3. Bult C, Eppig J, Kadin J, Richardson J, Blake J, Airey M, Anagnostopoulos A, Babiuk R, Baldarelli R, Baya M, et al. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): Mouse biology and model systems. Nucleic Acids Research 2008, (36 Database):D724-D728. 2238849, 18158299.
4. Rogers A, Antoshechkin I, Bieri T, Blasiar D, Bastiani C, Canaran P, Chan J, Chen WJ, Davis P, Fernandes J, et al. WormBase 2007. Nucleic Acids Research 2008, 36(Supplement 1):D612-617. 2238927, 17991679.
5. Huala E, Dickerman AW, Garcia-Hernandez M, Weems D, Reiser L, LaFond F, Hanley D, Kiphart D, Zhuang M, Huang W, et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): a comprehensive database and web-based information retrieval, analysis, and visualization system for a model plant. Nucleic Acids Research 2001, 29(1):102-105. 10.1093/nar/29.1.102, 29827, 11125061.
6. Sprague J, Bayraktaroglu L, Clements D, Conlin T, Fashena D, Frazer K, Haendel M, Howe DG, Mani P, Ramachandran S, et al. The Zebrafish Information Network: the zebrafish model organism database. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34(Suplement 1):D581-585. 10.1093/nar/gkj086, 1347449, 16381936.
7. Camon E, Magrane M, Barrell D, Binns D, Fleischmann W, Kersey P, Mulder N, Oinn T, Maslen J, Cox A, et al. The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Project: Implementation of GO in SWISS-PROT, TrEMBL and InterPro. Genome Research 2003, 13(4):662-672. 10.1101/gr.461403, 430163, 12654719.
8. Camon E, Magrane M, Barrell D, Lee V, Dimmer E, Maslen J, Binns D, Harte N, Lopez R, Apweiler R. The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database: Sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Research 2004, (32 Database):D262-D266. 10.1093/nar/gkh021, 308756, 14681408.
9. Cortón M, Botella-Carretero JI, Benguria A, Villuendas G, Zaballos A, San Millán JL, Escobar-Morreale HF, Peral B. Differential gene expression profile in omental adipose tissue in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007, 92(1):328-337. 10.1210/jc.2006-1665, 17062763.
10. Mahdavi M, Lin Y-H. False positive reduction in protein-protein interaction predictions using gene ontology annotations. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(1):262. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-262, 1941744, 17645798.
11. Jensen LJ, Gupta R, Staerfeldt HH, Brunak S. Prediction of human protein function according to Gene Ontology categories. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(5):635-642. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg036, 12651722.
12. Yi G, Sze S-H, Thon MR. Identifying clusters of functionally related genes in genomes. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(9):1053-1060. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl673, 17237058.
13. Rhee SY, Wood V, Dolinski K, Draghici S. Use and misuse of the gene ontology annotations. Nature Reviews Genetics 2008, 9:509-515. 10.1038/nrg2363, 18475267.
14. Harris M, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, Eilbeck K, Lewis S, Marshall B, Mungall C, et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Research 2004, 31:D258-261.
15. Biswas M, O'Rourke JF, Camon E, Fraser G, Kanapin A, Karavidopoulou Y, Kersey P, Kriventseva E, Mittard V, Mulder N, et al. Applications of InterPro in protein annotation and genome analysis. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2002, 3(3):285-295. 10.1093/bib/3.3.285, 12230037.
16. Berardini TZ, Mundodi S, Reiser L, Huala E, Garcia-Hernandez M, Zhang P, Mueller LA, Yoon J, Doyle A, Lander G, et al. Functional annotation of the arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiology 2004, 135:745-755. 10.1104/pp.104.040071, 514112, 15173566.
17. Weng S, Dong Q, Balakrishnan R, Christie K, Costanzo M, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Engel S, Fisk DG, Hong E, et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides biochemical and structural information for budding yeast proteins. Nucleic Acids Research 2003, 31(1):216-218. 10.1093/nar/gkg054, 165501, 12519985.
18. Kuśnierczyk W. Taxonomy-based partitioning of the Gene Ontology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2008, 41:282-292. 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.07.007, 17921072.
19. Wang JZ, Du Z, Payattakool R, Yu PS, Chen C-F. A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(10):1274-1281. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm087, 17344234.
20. Tao Y, Sam L, Li J, Friedman C, Lussier YA. Information theory applied to the sparse gene ontology annotation network to predict novel gene function. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(13):i529-538. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm195, 2882681, 17646340.
21. Lin D. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'98): 1998; Madison, Wisconson 1998, 296-304. Morgan Kaufmann.
22. Yu H, Jansen R, Stolovitzky G, Gerstein M. Total ancestry measure: quantifying the similarity in tree-like classification, with genomic applications. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(16):2163-2173. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm291, 17540677.
23. Resnik P. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95): August 20-25, 1995 1995; Montreal, Canada 1995, 448-453.
24. Resnik P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1999, 11:95-130.
25. del Pozo A, Pazos F, Valencia A. Defining functional distances over Gene Ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(1):50. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-50, 2375122, 18221506.
26. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bradley P, Bork P, Bucher P, Cerutti L, et al. InterPro, progress and status in 2005. Nucleic Acids Research 2005, (33 Database):D201-205. 540060, 15608177.
27. Hong EL, Balakrishnan R, Dong Q, Christie KR, Park J, Binkley G, Costanzo MC, Dwight SS, Engel SR, Fisk DG, et al. Gene Ontology annotations at SGD: new data sources and annotation methods. Nucleic Acids Research 2007, (36 Database):D577-D581. 10.1093/nar/gkm909, 2238894, 17982175.
28. Kanapin A, Batalov S, Davis MJ, Gough J, Grimmond SM, Kawaji H, Magrane M, Matsuda H, Schonbach C, Teasdale RD, et al. Mouse Proteome Analysis. Genome Research 2003, 13(6B):1335-1344. 10.1101/gr.978703, 403658, 12819131.
29. Zhou X, Zu Z. EasyGO: Gene Ontology-based annotation and functional enrichment analysis tool for agronomical species. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:246. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-246, 1940007, 17645808.
30. Zheng Q, Wang X-J. GOEAST: a web-based software toolkit for Gene Ontology enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, (36 Web Server):358-363.
31. Chu S, DeRisi J, Eisen M, Mulholland J, Botstein D, Brown PO, Herskowitz I. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 1998, 282(5389):699-705. 10.1126/science.282.5389.699, 9784122.
32. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. British Medical Journal 1995, 310:170. 2548561, 7833759.
33. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1995, 57(1):289-300.