Computational analysis and modeling of cleavage by the immunoproteasome and the constitutive proteasome

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Diez Rivero, Carmen M ^a   Lafuente, Esther M ^a   Reche, Pedro A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIGEN PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSS VALIDATION; DEVELOPED MODEL; FRAGMENT LENGTHS; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEOLYTIC DEGRADATION;

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); EPITOPES; FORECASTING; MOLECULES; PEPTIDES;

T-CELLS;

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS 1;

CD8 ANTIGEN; EPITOPE; PROTEASOME;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD8; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; EPITOPES, T-LYMPHOCYTE; GENES, MHC CLASS I; HUMANS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX;

EID: 77956881280     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-479     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Garcia KC, Teyton L, Wilson IA. Structural basis of T cell recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 1999, 17:369-397. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.369, 10358763.
2. Margulies DH. Interactions of TCRs with MHC-peptide complexes: a quantitative basis for mechanistic models. Curr Opin Immunol 1997, 9(3):390-395. 10.1016/S0952-7915(97)80086-6, 9203420.
3. Wang J-H, Reinherz E. Structural basis of T cell recognition of peptides bound to MHC molecules. Molecular Immunology 2001, 38:1039-1049.
4. Pamer E, Cresswell P. Mechanisms of MHC class I--restricted antigen processing. Annu Rev Immunol 1998, 16:323-358. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.323, 9597133.
5. Kloetzel PM. Antigen processing by the proteasome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2(3):179-187. 10.1038/35056572, 11265247.
6. Serwold T, Gonzalez F, Kim J, Jacob, Shastri N. ERAAP customizes peptides for MHC class I molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 2002, 419(6906):480-483. 10.1038/nature01074, 12368856.
7. Craiu A, Akopian T, Goldberg A, Rock KL. Two distinct proteolytic processes in the generation of a major histocompatibility complex class I-presented peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94(20):10850-10855. 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10850, 23505, 9380723.
8. Rock KL, Gramm C, Rothstein L, Clark K, Stein R, Dick L, Hwang D, Goldberg AL. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 1994, 78(5):761-771. 10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90462-6, 8087844.
9. Rock KL, Goldberg AL. Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. Annu Rev Immunol 1999, 17:739-779. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.739, 10358773.
10. Nussbaum AK, Dick TP, Keilholz W, Schirle M, Stevanović S, Dietz K, Heinemeyer W, Groll M, Wolf DH, Huber R, et al. Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20 S proteasome β subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1998, 95:12504-12509. 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12504, 22860, 9770515.
11. Groettrup M, Standera S, Stohwasser R, Kloetzel PM. The subunits MECL-1 and LMP2 are mutually required for incorporation into the 20 S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94(17):8970-8975. 10.1073/pnas.94.17.8970, 22989, 9256419.
12. Morel S, Levy F, Burlet-Schiltz O, Brasseur F, Probst-Kepper M, Peitrequin AL, Monsarrat B, Van Velthoven, Cerottini JC, Boon T, et al. Processing of some antigens by the standard proteasome but not by the immunoproteasome results in poor presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 2000, 12(1):107-117. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80163-6, 10661410.
13. Toes E, Nussbaum AK, Degermann S, Schirle M, Emmerich NP, Kraft M, Laplace C, Zwinderman A, Dick TP, Muller J, et al. Discrete cleavage motifs of constitutive and immunoproteasomes revealed by quantitative analysis of cleavage products. J Exp Med 2001, 194(1):1-12. 10.1084/jem.194.1.1, 2193442, 11435468.
14. Gaczynska M, Rock K, Spies T, Goldberg A. Peptidase activities of proteasomes are differentially regulated by the major histocompatibility complex-encoded genes for LMP2 and LMP7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91(20):9213-9217. 10.1073/pnas.91.20.9213, 44782, 7937744.
15. Chapiro J, Claverol S, Piette F, Ma W, Stroobant V, Guillaume B, Gairin JE, Morel S, Burlet-Schiltz O, Monsarrat B, et al. Destructive cleavage of antigenic peptides either by the immunoproteasome or by the standard proteasome results in differential antigen presentation. J Immunol 2006, 176(2):1053-1061.
16. Nussbaum A, Kuttler C, Hadeler K, Rammensee H, Schild H. PAProC: a prediction algorithm for proteasomal cleavages available on the WWW. Immunogenetics 2001, 53(2):87-94. 10.1007/s002510100300, 11345595.
17. Kuttler C, Nussbaum AK, Dick TP, Rammensee HG, Schild H, Hadeler KP. An algorithm for the prediction of proteasomal cleavages. J Mol Biol 2000, 298(3):417-429. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3683, 10772860.
18. Tenzer S, Peters B, Bulik S, Schoor O, Lemmel C, Schatz MM, Kloetzel PM, Rammensee HG, Schild H, Holzhutter HG. Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage, TAP transport and MHC class I binding. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005, 62(9):1025-1037. 10.1007/s00018-005-4528-2, 15868101.
19. Holzhütter H, Frömmel C, Kloetzel P. A theoretical approach towards the identification of cleavage-determining amino acid motifs of the 20 S proteasome. J Mol Biol 1999, 286(4):1251-1265. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2530, 10047495.
20. Holzhutter HG, Kloetzel PM. A kinetic model of vertebrate 20 S proteasome accounting for the generation of major proteolytic fragments from oligomeric peptide substrates. Biophys J 2000, 79(3):1196-1205. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76374-0, 1301016, 10968984.
21. Kesmir C, Nussbaum AK, Schild H, Detours V, Brunak S. Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. Protein Eng 2002, 15(4):287-296. 10.1093/protein/15.4.287, 11983929.
22. Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Lund O, Kesmir C. The role of the proteasome in generating cytotoxic T-cell epitopes: insights obtained from improved predictions of proteasomal cleavage. Immunogenetics 2005, 57(1-2):33-41. 10.1007/s00251-005-0781-7, 15744535.
23. Bhasin M, Raghava GPS. Pcleavage: an SVM based method for prediction of constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome cleavage sites in antigenic sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 2005, 33:W202-W207. 10.1093/nar/gki587, 1160263, 15988831.
24. Saxová P, Buus S, Brunak S, Kesmir C. Predicting proteasomal cleavage sites: a comparison of available methods. International Immunology 2003, 15(7):781-787. 10.1093/intimm/dxg084, 12807816.
25. Stolcke A. SRILM -- An Extensible Language Modeling Toolkit. Proceedings of the International Conference of Spoken Language Processing 2002, 2:901-904. Boulder, CO: Center for Spoken Language Research, JJ Ohala TMN, BL Derwing M, Hodge M, Wiebe GE.
26. Altuvia Y, Margalit H. Sequence signals for generation of antigenic peptides by the proteasome: implications for proteasomal cleavage mechanism. J Mol Biol 2000, 295(4):879-890. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3392, 10656797.
27. Reche PA, Zhang H, Glutting JP, Reinherz EL. EPIMHC: a curated database of MHC-binding peptides for customized computational vaccinology. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(9):2140-2141. Epub 2005 Jan 2118, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti269, 15657103.
28. Peters B, Sidney J, Bourne P, Bui H, Buus S, Doh G, Fleri W, Kronenberg M, Kubo R, Lund O, et al. The immune epitope database and analysis resource: from vision to blueprint. PLoS Biol 2005, 3(3):e91. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030091, 1065705, 15760272.
29. HIV Molecular Immunology 2006/2007. 2007, Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Biology and Biophysics.
30. Neuwald AF, Liu JS, Lawrence CE. Gibbs motif sampling detection of bacterial outer membrane protein repeats. Prot Sci 1995, 4:1618-1632.
31. Matthews B. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975, 405:442-451.
32. Reche PA, Glutting J-P, Reinherz EL. Enhancement to the RANKPEP resource for the prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules using profiles. Immunogenetics 2004, 56:405-419. 10.1007/s00251-004-0709-7, 15349703.
33. Lafuente EM, Reche PA. Prediction of MHC-peptide binding: a systematic and comprehensive overview. Curr Pharm Des 2009, 15(28):3209-3220. 10.2174/138161209789105162, 19860671.
34. Reche PA, Glutting JP, Reinherz EL. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides using profile motifs. Hum Immunol 2002, 63(9):701-709. 10.1016/S0198-8859(02)00432-9, 12175724.
35. Reche PA, Reinherz EL. Prediction of peptide-MHC binding using profiles. Methods Mol Biol 2007, 409:185-200. full_text, 18450001.
36. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240(4857):1285-1293. 10.1126/science.3287615, 3287615.
37. Dönnes P, Kohlbacher O. Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway. Protein Science 2005, 14(8):2132-2140. 10.1110/ps.051352405, 2279325, 15987883.
38. Rosenfeld. Two decades of statistical language modeling: Where do we go from here?. Proceedings of the IEEE 2000, 88(8):1-11.
39. Jimenez-Montano MA, Ebeling W, Pohl T, Rapp PE. Entropy and complexity of finite sequences as fluctuating quantities. Biosystems 2002, 64(1-3):23-32. 10.1016/S0303-2647(01)00171-X, 11755485.
40. Wu C, Shivakumar S. Back-propagation and counter-propagation neural networks for phylogenetic classification of ribosomal RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22(20):4291-4299. 10.1093/nar/22.20.4291, 331947, 7937158.
41. Wu CH, Zhao S, Chen HL, Lo CJ, McLarty J. Motif identification neural design for rapid and sensitive protein family search. Comput Appl Biosci 1996, 12(2):109-118.
42. Kloetzel PM. Generation of major histocompatibility complex class I antigens: functional interplay between proteasomes and TPPII. Nat Immunol 2004, 5(7):661-669. 10.1038/ni1090, 15224091.
43. Reits E, Neijssen J, Herberts C, Benckhuijsen W, Janssen L, Drijfhout JW, Neefjes J. A major role for TPPII in trimming proteasomal degradation products for MHC class I antigen presentation. Immunity 2004, 20(4):495-506. 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00074-3, 15084277.
44. Yewdell JW, Princiotta MF. Proteasomes get by with lots of help from their friends. Immunity 2004, 20(4):362-363. 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00086-X, 15084265.
45. Heath W, Belz T, Behrens G, Smith C, Forehan S, Parish I, Davey G, Wilson N, Carbone F, Villadangos J. Cross-presentation, dendritic cell subsets, and the generation of immunity to cellular antigens. Immunological Reviews 2004, 199(1):9-26. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00142.x, 15233723.
46. Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, Davoust J, Lebecque S, Liu Y, Pulendran B, Palucka K. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2000, 18:767-811. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.767, 10837075.
47. Kisselev AF, Akopian TN, Woo KM, Goldberg AL. The sizes of peptides generated from protein by mammalian 26 and 20 S proteasomes. Implications for understanding the degradative mechanism and antigen presentation. J Biol Chem 1999, 274(6):3363-3371. 10.1074/jbc.274.6.3363, 9920878.
48. Meister GE, Roberts CG, Berzofsky JA, De Groot AS. Two novel T cell epitope prediction algorithms based on MHC-binding motifs; comparison of predicted and published epitopes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV protein sequences. Vaccine 1995, 13(6):581-591. 10.1016/0264-410X(94)00014-E, 7483779.
49. Ginodi I, Vider-Shalit T, Tsaban L, Louzoun Y. Precise score for the prediction of peptides cleaved by the proteasome. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(4):477-483. Epub 2008 Jan 2023, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm616, 18216070.
50. Wang P, Sidney J, Dow C, Mothe B, Sette A, Peters B. A systematic assessment of MHC class II peptide binding predictions and evaluation of a consensus approach. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(4):e1000048. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000048, 2267221, 18389056.
51. Doytchinova IA, Flower CR. Class I T-cell epitope prediction: Improvements using a combination of proteasome cleavage, TAP affinity, and MHC binding. Molecular Immunology 2006, 43(13):2037-2044. 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.12.013, 16524630.
52. Larsen MV, Lundegaard C, Lamberth K, Buus S, Brunak S, Lund O, Nielsen M. An integrative approach to CTL epitope prediction: a combined algorithm integrating MHC class I binding, TAP transport efficiency, and proteasomal cleavage predictions. Eur J Immunol 2005, 35(8):2295-2303. 10.1002/eji.200425811, 15997466.