Precise score for the prediction of peptides cleaved by the proteasome

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 477-483

  Ginodi, Ido ^a   Vider Shalit, Tal ^a   Tsaban, Lea ^a   Louzoun, Yoram ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPITOPE; PEPTIDE; PROTEASOME;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE; INTERNET; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 39149096295     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm616     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Altuvia,Y. and Margalit,H. (2000) Sequence signals for generation of antigenic peptides by the proteasome: Implications for proteasomal cleavage mechanism. J. Mol. Biol., 295, 879-890.
2. Beninga,J. et al. (1998) Interferon-gamma can stimulate post-proteasomal trimming of the N terminus of an antigenic peptide by inducing leucine aminopeptidase. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 18734-18742.
3. Boes,B. et al. (1994) Interferon gamma stimulation modulates the proteolytic activity and cleavage site preference of 20S mouse proteasomes. J. Exp. Med., 179, 901-909.
4. Bose,B et al. (2001) gamma-Interferon decreases the level of 26 S proteasomes and changes the pattern of phosphorylation. Biochem. J. 353, 291-297.
5. Brooks,P. et al. (2000) Subcellular localization of proteasomes and their regulatory complexes in mammalian cells. Biochem. J., 346, 155-161.
6. Chen,W. et al. (2001) Immunoproteasomes shape immunodominance hierarchies of antiviral CD8(+) T cells at the levels of T cell repertoire and presentation of viral antigens. J. Exp. Med., 193, 1319-1326.
7. Ciechanover,A. (1998) The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: On protein death and cell life. The EMBO J., 17, 7151-7160.
8. Coux,O. et al. (1996) Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 65, 801.
9. Eggers,M. et al. (1995) The cleavage preference of the proteasome governs the yield of antigenic peptides. J. Exp. Med., 182, 1865-1870.
10. Emmerich,N.P.N. et al. (2000) The human 26 S and 20 S proteasomes generate overlapping but different sets of peptide fragments from a model protein substrate. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 21140-21148.
11. Groettrup,M. et al. (1995) The interferon-gamma-inducible 11 S regulator (PA28) and the LMP2/LMP7 subunits govern the peptide production by the 20 S proteasome in vitro. J. Biol. Chem., 270 23808-23815.
12. Gronostajski,R.M. et al. (1985) The ATP dependence of the degradation of short- and long-lived proteins in growing fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem., 260, 3344-3349.
13. Hershko,A. and Ciechanover,A. (1992) The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Ann. Rev. Biochem., 61, 761-807.
14. Holzhutter,H.G. et al. (1999) A theoretical approach towards the identification of cleavage-determining amino acid motifs of the 20 S proteasome. J. Mol. Biol., 286, 1251-1265.
15. Kesmir,C. et al. (2003) Bioinformatic analysis of functional differences between the immunoproteasome and the constitutive proteasome. Immunogenetics, 55, 437-449.
16. Kesmit,C. et al. (2002) Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. Prot. Eng., 15, 287-296.
17. Khan,S. et al. (2001) Immunoproteasomes largely replace constitutive proteasomes during an antiviral and antibacterial immune response in the liver. J. Immunol., 167, 6859-6868.
18. Kirkpatrick,S. et al. (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671.
19. Kisselev,A.F. et al. (1999) The sizes of peptides generated from protein by mammalian 26 an 20S proteasomes: Implications for understanding the degradative mechanism and antigen presentation. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 3363.
20. Koopmann,J.O. et al. (1997) Generation, intracellular transport and loading of peptides associated with MHC class-I mulecules. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 9, 80-88.
21. Lee,D.H. and Goldberg,A.L. (1998) Proteasome inhibitors: Valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol., 8, 397-403.
22. Leibovitz,D. et al. (1994) Sequential degradation of the neuropeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone by the 20 S granulosa cell-proteasomes. FEBS Lett., 346, 203-206.
23. Matsumoto,M. and Kurita,Y. (1994) Twisted GFSR generators II. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul., 4, 254-266.
24. Monu,N. and Trombetta,E.S. (2007) Cross-talk between the endocytic pathway and the endoplasmic reticulum in cross-presentation by MHC class I molecules. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 19, 66-72.
25. Nandi,D. et al. (1997) Intermediates in the formation of mouse 20S proteasomes: Implications for the assembly of precursor beta subunits. EMBO J., 16, 5363-5375.
26. Niedermann,G. et al. (1997) Potential immunocompetence of proteolytic fragments produced by proteasomes before evolution of the vertebrate immune system. J. Exp. Med., 186, 209-220.
27. Niedermann,G. et al. (1996) The proteolytic fragments generated by vertebrate proteasomes: Structural relationships to major histocompatibility complex class I binding peptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 8572-8577.
28. Nussbaum,A.K. (2001) Prediction Algorithm for Proteasomal Cleavages University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
29. Nussbaum,A.K. et al. (1998) Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20S proteasome beta subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 12504-12509.
30. Peters,B. et al. (2002) Assessment of proteasomal cleavage probabilities from kinetic analysis of time-dependent product formation. J. Mol. Biol., 318, 847-862.
31. Peters,B. et al. (2005) The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource: From Vision to Blueprint. PLoS Biol., 3, e91.
32. PROWL PROWL-Amino acid properties. http://prowl.rockefeller.edu/aainfo/ contents.htm (Accessed on January, 2007).
33. Rammensee,H, et al. (1999) SYFPEITHI: Database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics, 50, 213-219.
34. Rammensee,H.G. et al. (1993) Peptides naturally presented by MHC class I mulecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol., 11, 213.
35. Rivett,A.J. (1985) Purification of a liver alkaline protease which degrades oxidatively modified glutamine synthetase. Characterization as a high molecular weight cysteine proteinase. J. Biol. Chem., 260, 12600-12606.
36. Rivett,A.J. et al. (2001) Regulation of proteasome complexes by gamma interferon and phosphorylation. Biochimie, 83, 363-366.
37. Rock,K.L. and Goldberg,A.L. (1999) Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class1-presented peptides. Annu. Rev. Immunol., 17, 739-779.
38. Rockel,T.D. et al. (2005) Proteasomes degrade proteins in focal subdomains of the human cell nucleus. J. Cell. Ser., 118, 5231-5242.
39. Saxova,P. et al. (2003) Predicting proteasomal cleavage sites: A comparison of available methods. Int. immunol., 15, 781-787.
40. Sette,A. et al. (2005) A roadmap for the immunomics of category A-C pathogens. Immunity, 22, 155-161.
41. Tanaka,K. and Kashara,M. (1998) The MHC class I ligand-generating system: Roles of immunoproteasomes and the interferon-gamma inducible proteasome activator PA28. Immunol. Rev., 163, 161-176.
42. Tenzer,S. et al. (2004) Quantitative Analysis of prion-protein degradation by constitutive and immuno-20S proteasomes indicates differences correlated with disease susceptibility. J. Immunol., 172, 1083-1091.
43. Toes,R.E.M. et al. (2001) Discrete cleavage motifs of constitutive and immunoproteasomes revealed by quantitative analysis of cleavage products. J. Exp. Med., 194, 1-12.
44. Wenzel,T. et al. (1994) Existence of a molecular ruler in proteasomes suggested by analysis of degradation products. FEBS Lett. 349, 205-209.