Control of DNA replication: A new facet of Hox proteins?

BioEssays

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 800-807

  Miotto, Benoit ^a   Graba, Yacine ^b  

^a Université Sorbonne Paris Cité   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

DNA replication; Geminin; Homeodomain; Hox; Transcription

Indexed keywords

DNA; HOX PROTEIN;

CELL CYCLE REGULATION; DNA REPLICATION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; HUMANS; MICE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 77956685012     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201000048     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Wellik DM. 2009. Hox genes and vertebrate axial pattern. Curr Top Dev Biol 88: 257-78.
2. Gehring WJ, Kloter U, Suga H. 2009. Evolution of the Hox gene complex from an evolutionary ground state. Curr Top Dev Biol 88: 35-61.
3. Young T, Deschamps J. 2009. Hox, Cdx, and anteroposterior patterning in the mouse embryo. Curr Top Dev Biol 88: 235-55.
4. Pearson JC, Lemons D, McGinnis W. 2005. Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat Rev Genet 6: 893-904.
5. Pavlopoulos A, Kontarakis Z, Liubicich DM, et al. 2009. Probing the evolution of appendage specialization by Hox gene misexpression in an emerging model crustacean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 13897-902.
6. Liubicich DM, Serano JM, Pavlopoulos A, et al. 2009. Knockdown of Parhyale Ultrabithorax recapitulates evolutionary changes in crustacean appendage morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 13892-6.
7. Jeong S, Rokas A, Carroll SB. 2006. Regulation of body pigmentation by the Abdominal-B Hox protein and its gain and loss in Drosophila evolution. Cell 125: 1387-99.
8. Argiropoulos B, Humphries RK. 2007. Hox genes in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Oncogene 26: 6766-76.
9. Shah N, Sukumar S. 2010. The Hox genes and their roles in oncogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 361-71.
10. Gehring WJ, Affolter M, Burglin T. 1994. Homeodomain proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 63: 487-526.
11. Berger MF, Badis G, Gehrke AR, et al. 2008. Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell 133: 1266-76.
12. Noyes MB, Christensen RG, Wakabayashi A, et al. 2008. Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 133: 1277-89.
13. Merabet S, Pradel J, Graba Y. 2005. Getting a molecular grasp on Hox contextual activity. Trends Genet 21: 477-80.
14. Merabet S, Hudry B, Saadaoui M, et al. 2009. Classification of sequence signatures: a guide to Hox protein function. Bioessays 31: 500-11.
15. Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R. 2009. Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr Top Dev Biol 88: 63-101.
16. Niessing D, Blanke S, Jackle H. 2002. Bicoid associates with the 5′-cap-bound complex of caudal mRNA and represses translation. Genes Dev 16: 2576-82.
17. Cho PF, Poulin F, Cho-Park YA, et al. 2005. A new paradigm for translational control: inhibition via 5′-3′ mRNA tethering by Bicoid and the eIF4E cognate 4EHP. Cell 121: 411-23.
18. Joliot A, Pernelle C, Deagostini-Bazin H, et al. 1991. Antennapedia homeobox peptide regulates neural morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 1864-8.
19. Perez F, Joliot A, Bloch-Gallego E, et al. 1992. Antennapedia homeobox as a signal for the cellular internalization and nuclear addressing of a small exogenous peptide. J Cell Sci 102: 717-22.
20. Chatelin L, Volovitch M, Joliot AH, et al. 1996. Transcription factor hoxa-5 is taken up by cells in culture and conveyed to their nuclei. Mech Dev 55: 111-7.
21. Derossi D, Joliot AH, Chassaing G, et al. 1994. The third helix of the Antennapedia homeodomain translocates through biological membranes. J Biol Chem 269: 10444-50.
22. Sugiyama S, Di Nardo AA, Aizawa S, et al. 2008. Experience-dependent transfer of Otx2 homeoprotein into the visual cortex activates postnatal plasticity. Cell 134: 508-20.
23. Wizenmann A, Brunet I, Lam JS, et al. 2009. Extracellular Engrailed participates in the topographic guidance of retinal axons in vivo. Neuron 64: 355-66.
24. Brunet I, Weinl C, Piper M, et al. 2005. The transcription factor Engrailed-2 guides retinal axons. Nature 438: 94-8.
25. Rubin E, Wu X, Zhu T, et al. 2007. A role for the HOXB7 homeodomain protein in DNA repair. Cancer Res 67: 1527-35.
26. Farkash-Amar S, Simon I. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of the replication program in mammals. Chromosome Res 18: 115-25.
27. Cadoret JC, Meisch F, Hassan-Zadeh V, et al. 2008. Genome-wide studies highlight indirect links between human replication origins and gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 15837-42.
28. Sequeira-Mendes J, Diaz-Uriarte R, Apedaile A, et al. 2009. Transcription initiation activity sets replication origin efficiency in mammalian cells. PLoS Genet 5: e1000446.
29. Pak DT, Pflumm M, Chesnokov I, et al. 1997. Association of the origin recognition complex with heterochromatin and HP1 in higher eukaryotes. Cell 91: 311-23.
30. Triolo T, Sternglanz R. 1996. Role of interactions between the origin recognition complex and SIR1 in transcriptional silencing. Nature 381: 251-3.
31. Yankulov K, Todorov I, Romanowski P, et al. 1999. MCM proteins are associated with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Mol Cell Biol 19: 6154-63.
32. Luo L, Yang X, Takihara Y, et al. 2004. The cell-cycle regulator geminin inhibits Hox function through direct and polycomb-mediated interactions. Nature 427: 749-53.
33. Del Bene F, Tessmar-Raible K, Wittbrodt J. 2004. Direct interaction of geminin and Six3 in eye development. Nature 427: 745-9.
34. Gilbert DM. 2004. In search of the holy replicator. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 848-55.
35. Kohzaki H, Murakami Y. 2005. Transcription factors and DNA replication origin selection. Bioessays 27: 1107-16.
36. Yanagi K, Mizuno T, Tsuyama T, et al. 2005. Caenorhabditis elegans geminin homologue participates in cell cycle regulation and germ line development. J Biol Chem 280: 19689-94.
37. Luo L, Uerlings Y, Happel N, et al. 2007. Regulation of geminin functions by cell cycle-dependent nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling. Mol Cell Biol 27: 4737-44.
38. Salsi V, Ferrari S, Ferraresi R, et al. 2009. HOXD13 binds DNA replication origins to promote origin licensing and is inhibited by geminin. Mol Cell Biol 29: 5775-88.
39. Bromleigh VC, Freedman LP. 2000. p21 is a transcriptional target of HOXA10 in differentiating myelomonocytic cells. Genes Dev 14: 2581-6.
40. Krosl J, Sauvageau G. 2000. AP-1 complex is effector of Hox-induced cellular proliferation and transformation. Oncogene 19: 5134-41.
41. Shermoen AW, O'Farrell PH. 1991. Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts. Cell 67: 303-10.
42. Abate-Shen C. 2002. Deregulated homeobox gene expression in cancer: cause or consequence? Nat Rev Cancer 2: 777-85.
43. McGonigle GJ, Lappin TR, Thompson A. 2008. Grappling with the HOX network in hematopoiesis and leukemia. Front Biosci 13: 4297-308.
44. de Stanchina E, Gabellini D, Norio P, et al. 2000. Selection of homeotic proteins for binding to a human DNA replication origin. J Mol Biol 299: 667-80.
45. Gabellini D, Colaluca IN, Vodermaier HC, et al. 2003. Early mitotic degradation of the homeoprotein HOXC10 is potentially linked to cell cycle progression. EMBO J 22: 3715-24.
46. Comelli L, Marchetti L, Arosio D, et al. 2009. The homeotic protein HOXC13 is a member of human DNA replication complexes. Cell Cycle 8: 454-9.
47. Bell SP, Dutta A. 2002. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 333-74.
48. Takisawa H, Mimura S, Kubota Y. 2000. Eukaryotic DNA replication: from pre-replication complex to initiation complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12: 690-6.
49. Tada S, Li A, Maiorano D, et al. 2001. Repression of origin assembly in metaphase depends on inhibition of RLF-B/Cdt1 by geminin. Nat Cell Biol 3: 107-13.
50. Wohlschlegel JA, Dwyer BT, Dhar SK, et al. 2000. Inhibition of eukaryotic DNA replication by geminin binding to Cdt1. Science 290: 2309-12.
51. Kerppola TK. 2008. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis as a probe of protein interactions in living cells. Annu Rev Biophys 37: 465-87.
52. Geisberg JV, Struhl K. 2004. Quantitative sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation, a method for analyzing co-occupancy of proteins at genomic regions in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 32: e151.
53. Lu Z, Hardt J, Kim JJ. 2008. Global analysis of genes regulated by HOXA10 in decidualization reveals a role in cell proliferation. Mol Hum Reprod 14: 357-66.
54. Krosl J, Baban S, Krosl G, et al. 1998. Cellular proliferation and transformation induced by HOXB4 and HOXB3 proteins involves cooperation with PBX1. Oncogene 16: 3403-12.
55. Iizuka M, Matsui T, Takisawa H, et al. 2006. Regulation of replication licensing by acetyltransferase Hbo1. Mol Cell Biol 26: 1098-108.
56. Miotto B, Struhl K. 2006. Differential gene regulation by selective association of transcriptional coactivators and bZIP DNA-binding domains. Mol Cell Biol 26: 5969-82.
57. Miotto B, Struhl K. 2008. HBO1 histone acetylase is a coactivator of the replication licensing factor Cdt1. Genes Dev 22: 2633-8.
58. Petersen BO, Lukas J, Sorensen CS, et al. 1999. Phosphorylation of mammalian CDC6 by cyclin A/CDK2 regulates its subcellular localization. EMBO J 18: 396-410.
59. Dominguez-Sola D, Ying CY, Grandori C, et al. 2007. Non-transcriptional control of DNA replication by c-Myc. Nature 448: 445-51.
60. Hueber SD, Lohmann I. 2008. Shaping segments: Hox gene function in the genomic age. Bioessays 30: 965-79.
61. Graba Y, Aragnol D, Pradel J. 1997. Drosophila Hox complex downstream targets and the function of homeotic genes. Bioessays 19: 379-88.
62. Vashee S, Cvetic C, Lu W, et al. 2003. Sequence-independent DNA binding and replication initiation by the human origin recognition complex. Genes Dev 17: 1894-908.
63. O'Neill EA, Fletcher C, Burrow CR, et al. 1988. Transcription factor OTF-1 is functionally identical to the DNA replication factor NF-III. Science 241: 1210-3.
64. Garcia-Blanco MA, Clerc RG, Sharp PA. 1989. The DNA-binding homeo domain of the Oct-2 protein. Genes Dev 3: 739-45.
65. Mysiak ME, Wyman C, Holthuizen PE, et al. 2004. NFI and Oct-1 bend the Ad5 origin in the same direction leading to optimal DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 6218-25.
66. Gimenes F, Takeda KI, Fiorini A, et al. 2008. Intrinsically bent DNA in replication origins and gene promoters. Genet Mol Res 7: 549-58.
67. de Jong RN, Mysiak ME, Meijer LA, et al. 2002. Recruitment of the priming protein pTP and DNA binding occur by overlapping Oct-1 POU homeodomain surfaces. EMBO J 21: 725-35.
68. Coenjaerts FE, van Oosterhout JA, van der Vliet PC. 1994. The Oct-1 POU domain stimulates adenovirus DNA replication by a direct interaction between the viral precursor terminal protein-DNA polymerase complex and the POU homeodomain. EMBO J 13: 5401-9.
69. Gregoire D, Brodolin K, Mechali M. 2006. HoxB domain induction silences DNA replication origins in the locus and specifies a single origin at its boundary. EMBO Rep 7: 812-6.
70. Danis E, Brodolin K, Menut S, et al. 2004. Specification of a DNA replication origin by a transcription complex. Nat Cell Biol 6: 721-30.
71. Kuziora MA, McGinnis W. 1989. A homeodomain substitution changes the regulatory specificity of the deformed protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell 59: 563-71.
72. Mann RS, Affolter M. 1998. Hox proteins meet more partners. Curr Opin Genet Dev 8: 423-9.
73. Kroon E, Krosl J, Thorsteinsdottir U, et al. 1998. Hoxa9 transforms primary bone marrow cells through specific collaboration with Meis1a but not Pbx1b. EMBO J 17: 3714-25.
74. Beslu N, Krosl J, Laurin M, et al. 2004. Molecular interactions involved in HOXB4-induced activation of HSC self-renewal. Blood 104: 2307-14.
75. Duboule D. 1995. Vertebrate Hox genes and proliferation: an alternative pathway to homeosis? Curr Opin Genet Dev 5: 525-8.
76. Horan GS, Kovacs EN, Behringer RR, et al. 1995. Mutations in paralogous Hox genes result in overlapping homeotic transformations of the axial skeleton: evidence for unique and redundant function. Dev Biol 169: 359-72.
77. Dolle P, Dierich A, LeMeur M, et al. 1993. Disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene induces localized heterochrony leading to mice with neotenic limbs. Cell 75: 431-41.
78. Lumsden A. 1990. The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci 13: 329-35.
79. Laufer E, Nelson CE, Johnson RL, et al. 1994. Sonic hedgehog and Fgf-4 act through a signaling cascade and feedback loop to integrate growth and patterning of the developing limb bud. Cell 79: 993-1003.
80. Duboule D. 1992. The vertebrate limb: a model system to study the Hox/HOM gene network during development and evolution. Bioessays 14: 375-84.
81. Pourquie O. 2003. The segmentation clock: converting embryonic time into spatial pattern. Science 301: 328-30.
82. Ozbudak EM, Pourquie O. 2008. The vertebrate segmentation clock: the tip of the iceberg. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18: 317-23.
83. Young T, Rowland JE, van de Ven C, et al. 2009. Cdx and Hox genes differentially regulate posterior axial growth in mammalian embryos. Dev Cell 17: 516-26.
84. Falaschi A, Abdurashidova G, Biamonti G. 2010. DNA replication, development and cancer: a homeotic connection? Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 45: 14-22.