Phylogenetic relationships of the northeastern South American Brownea clade of tribe detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) based on morphology and molecular data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 524-533

  Redden, Karen M ^a   Herendeen, Patrick S ^b   Wurdack, Kenneth J ^a   Bruneau, Anne ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^b CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Elizabetha; Heterostemon; ITS; morphology; Paloue; trnL

Indexed keywords

BROWNEA; CAESALPINIOIDEAE; DETARIEAE; ELIZABETHA; FABACEAE; HETEROSTEMON; MIMOSOIDEAE; PALOUE; PAPILIONOIDEAE;

EID: 77956509372     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364410792495863     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aublet, J. B. C. F. 1775. Paloue guianensis. Pp. 365-367 in Histoire des plantes de la Guiane Francaise, vol 1. London and Paris: P. F. Didot jeune.
2. Banks, H. and B. B. Klitgaard. 2000. Palynological contribution to the sys-tematics of detarioid legumes. Pp. 79-106 in Advances in legume sys-tematics, part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
3. Banks, H., B. B. Klitgaard, G. P. Lewis, P. R. Crane, and A. Bruneau. 2003. Pollen and the systematics of tribes Caesalpinieae and Cassieae (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Pp. 95-122 in Advances in legume systematics, part 10, higher level systematics, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
4. Breteler, F. J. 1995. The boundary between Amherstieae and Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae). Pp. 53-61 in Advances in legume systematics, part 7, phy-logeny, eds. M. D. Crisp and J. J. Doyle. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
5. Brouat, C., L. Gielly, and D. McKey. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Leonardoxa (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) inferred from chloroplast trnL intron and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 88: 143-149.
6. Bruneau, A., M. Mercure, G. P. Lewis, and P. S. Herendeen. 2008. Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes. Canadian Journal of Botany 86: 697-718.
7. Bruneau, A., F. J. Breteler, J. J. Wieringa, G. Y. F. Gervais, and F. Forest. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Pp. 121-149 in Advances in legume systematics, part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
8. Bruneau,A.,F.Forest,P.S.Herendeen,B.B.Klitgaard,andG.P.Lewis. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Systematic Botany 26: 487-514.
9. Cowan, R. S. 1953. Revision of Macrolobium Schreb. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 8: 257-342.
10. Cowan, R. S. 1957. Studies in Tropical American Leguminosae III. Brittonia 8: 251-253.
11. Cowan, R. S. 1976. A taxonomic revision of Elizabetha (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse AkademieVan Wetenschappen Series C 79: 335-346.
12. Cowan, R. S. and R. M. Polhill. 1981. Deterieae. 117-134 in Advances in legume systematics, part 1, eds. R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
13. Davis, C. C., P. W. Fritsch, J. Li, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of Cercis (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribo-somal ITS and chloroplast ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 289-302.
14. Dolphin, K., R. Belshaw, C.David,L.Orme, and D.L. J.Quicke. 2000. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 401-406.
15. Doyle, J. J., J. A. Chappill, C. D. Bailey, and T. Kajita. 2000. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequence and non-molecular data. Pp. 1-20 in Advances in legume syzstematics, part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
16. Doyle, J. J. and M. A. Luckow. 2003. The rest of the iceberg. Legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiology 131: 900-910.
17. Farris, J. S., V. A. Albert, M. Källersjö, D. Lipscomb, and A. G. Kluge. 1996. Parsimony Jackknifing outperforms Neighbor-Joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
18. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
19. Felstenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
20. Fougère-Danezan, M., S. Maumont, and A. Bruneau. 2007. Relationships among resin producing Detarieae s.l. (Leguminosae) as inferred by molecular data. Systematic Botany 32: 748-761.
21. Fougère-Danezan, M., S. Maumont, and A. Bruneau. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. Pp. 161-180 in Advances in legume systematics, part 10, higher level systematics, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
22. Gasson, P. E. 1994. Wood anatomy of the tribe Sophoreae and related Caesalpinioideae and Papilionoideae. Pp. 11-32 in Advances in legume systematics, part 6, structural botany, eds. I. K. Ferguson and S. C. Tucker. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
23. Gervais,G.Y. F.andA. Bruneau. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of apolyphyl-etic African genus of Caesalpinioideae (Fabaceae): Monopetalanthus Harms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 235: 19-34.
24. Goloboff, P. 1993. NONA(a bastard son of Pee-Wee). Version. 2.0. Program and documentation available from http://www.cladistics.com. Published by the author, Tucumán, Argentina.
25. Herendeen, P. S. 2000. Structural evolution in Caesalpinioideae. Pp. 45-64 in Advances in legume systematics, part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
26. Herendeen, P. S., A. Bruneau, and G. P. Lewis. 2003a. Phylogenetic relationships in Caesalpinioid legumes: A preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data. Pp. 37-62 in in Advances in legume systematics, part 10, higher level systematics, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
27. Herendeen, P. S., G. P. Lewis, andA. Bruneau. 2003b. Floral morphology in caesalpinioid legumes: testing the monophyly of the "Umtiza Clade". International Journal of Plant Sciences 164(Supplement): S393-S407.
28. Hillis, D. M. and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
29. Jeandroz, S., A. Roy, and J. Bousquet. 1997. Phylogeny and phylogeogra-phy of the circumpolar genus Fraxinus (Oleaceae) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 241-251.
30. Kass, E. and M. Wink. 1996. Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: phy-logeny of the three subfamilies based on rbcL-sequences. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 365-378.
31. Keith, F. B. and F. M. Lutzoni. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 51: 625-637.
32. Klitgaard, B. B. 1991. Ecuadorian Brownea and Browneopsis (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae): taxonomy, palynology, and morphology. Nordic Journal of Botany 11: 433-449.
33. Léonard, J. 1952. Notulae systematicae 12. Les genres Macrolobium Schreb. et. Gilbertiodendron J. Léonard au Congo Belge (Caesalpiniaceae). Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de l'État 20: 269-284.
34. Lewis, G. and B. D. Schrire. 1995. A reappraisal of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae) using phylogenetic analysis. Pp. 41-52 in Advances in legume systematics, part 7, phylogeny, eds. M. D. Crisp and J. J. Doyle. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
35. Lewis, G., B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. 2005. Legumes of the orld. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
36. Mackinder, B. 2005. Tribe Detarieae. Pp. 69-109 in Legumes of the world. eds. G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
37. Mackinder, B. and D. J. Harris. 2006. A synopsis of the genus Berlinia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 63: 161-182.
38. Marazzi, B. and P. K. Endress. 2008. Patterns and development of floral asymmetry in Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae). American Journal of Botany 95: 22-40.
39. Marazzi, B., P. K. Endress, L. Paganucci de Queiroz, and E. Conti. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships within Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae) based on three chloroplast regions: patterns in the evolution of floral symmetry and extrafloral nectaries. American Journal of Botany 93: 288-303.
40. Neill, D. A. 1998. Ecuadendron (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae): a new arborescent genus from western Ecuador. Novon 8: 45-49.
41. Nickrent, D. L., K. P. Schuette, and E. M. Starr. 1994. A molecular phy-logeny of Arceuthobium (Viscaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 81: 1149-1160.
42. Nixon, K. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
43. Nixon, K. 1999-2002. WINCLADA version 1.00.08. Ithaca, New York, Distributed by the author. http://www.cladistics.com/about-winc. htm.
44. Pulle, A. A. 1906. Palovea Aubl. Pp. 212-213 in An enumeration of the vascular plants known from Suriname, together with their distribution and synonymy. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
45. Prenner, G. and B. B. Klitgaard. 2008. Towards unlocking the deep nodes of Leguminosae: Floral development and morphology of the enigmatic Duparquetia orchidacea (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). American Journal of Botany 95: 1349-1365.
46. Quicke, D. L., O. R. Jones, and D. R. Epstein. 2007. Correcting the problem of false incongruence due to noise imbalance in the incongruence length difference (ILD) test. Systematic Biology 56: 496-503.
47. Rambaut, A. 1996-2002. Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor v2.0a11. Oxford: University of Oxford. Available at http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
48. Redden, K. M. 2008. A new species of Paloue (Leguminosae: Caesalpini-oideae: Detarieae) from Guyana, South America. Brittonia 60: 257-260.
49. Redden, K. M. and P. S. Herendeen. 2006. Morphology and phyloge-netic analysis of Paloue and related genera in the Brownea clade (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 167: 1229-1246.
50. Rodrigues, W. A. and H. C. de Lima. 1989. Notas sobre os generos Paloue Aublet e Paloveopsis Cowan (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) no Brasil. Acta Amazonica 19: 147-153.
51. Sandwith, N. Y. 1937. Paloue induta Sandw. Kew Bulletin 2: 106.
52. Schnabel, A., P. E. McDonel, and J. F. Wendel. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in Gleditsia (Leguminosae) based on ITS sequences. American Journal of Botany 90: 310-320.
53. Simmons, M. P. and H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 40: 369-381.
54. Simpson, B. B. 1999. A revision of Hoffmannseggia (Fabaceae) in North America. Lundellia 2: 14-54.
55. Simpson, B. B., L. L. Larkin, and A. Weeks. 2003. Progress toward resolving the relationships of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Pp. 123-148 in Advances in legume systematics, part 10, higher level systematics, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
56. Simpson, B. B., J. A. Tate, and A. Weeks. 2004. Phylogeny and character evolution of Hoffmannseggia (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Systematic Botany 29: 933-946.
57. Stanford, A. M., R. Harden, and C. R. Parks. 2000. Phylogeny and bioge-ography of Juglans (Juglandaceae) based on matK and ITS sequence data. American Journal of Botany 87: 872-882.
58. Sun, Y., D. Z. Skinner, G. H. Liang, and S. H. Hulbert. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Sorghum and related taxa using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 26-32.
59. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
60. Tucker, S. C. 1992. The role of floral development studies in legume evolution. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 692-700.
61. Tucker, S. C. 2000a. Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. American Journal of Botany 87: 1385-1407.
62. Tucker, S. C. 2000b. Organ loss in detarioid and other leguminous flowers and the possibility of salutatory evolution. Pp. 107-120 in Advances in legume systematics, part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
63. Tucker, S. C. 2002a. Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Legu-minosae: Caesalpinioideae). 1. Radially symmetrical taxa lacking organ suppression. American Journal of Botany 89: 875-887.
64. Tucker, S. C. 2002b. Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Legu-minosae: Caesalpinioideae). 2. Zygomorphic taxa with petal and stamen suppression. American Journal of Botany 89: 888-907.
65. Tucker, S. C. andA. W. Douglas. 1994. Ontogenetic evidence and phyloge-netic relationships among basal taxa of legumes. Pp. 11-32 in Advances in legume systematics, part 6, structural botany, eds. I. K. Ferguson and S. C. Tucker. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
66. White, T. J., T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfnad, J. J. Sninisky, and T. J. White. San Diego: Academic Press.
67. Wieringa, J. J. 1999. Monopetalanthus exit. A systematic study of Aphanocalyx, Bikinia, Icuria, Michelsonia and Tetraberlinia (Leguminosae, Caesal-pinioideae). Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 99: 1-320.
68. Wieringa, J. J. and G. Y. F. Gervais. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses of combined morphological and molecular data sets on the Aphanocalyx-Bikinia- Tetraberlina group (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae s. l.). Pp. 181-196 in Advances in legume systematics, part 10, higher level systematics, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
69. Wojciechowski, M. F. 2003. Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): an early 21st century perspective. Pp. 5-35 in Advances in legume systematics, part 10, higher level systematics, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
70. Wojciechowski, M. F., M. Lavin, and M. J. Sanderson. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. American Journal of Botany 91: 1845-1861.
71. Wurdack, K. J., P. Hoffmann, R. Samuel, A. de Bruijn, M. van der Bank, and M. W. Chase. 2004. Molecular phylogenetics analysis of Phyllan-thaceae (Phyllanthoideae pro parte, Euphorbiaceae s. l.) using plastid rbcL DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 91: 1882-1900.