Towards unlocking the deep nodes of Leguminosae: Floral development and morphology of the enigmatic Duparquetia orchidacea (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 95, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1349-1365

  Prenner, Gerhard ^a   Klitgaard, Bente B ^b  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Caesalpinioideae; Duparquetia; Enantiostyly; Evolution; Fabaceae; Fabales; Floral development; Flower; Leguminosae; Morphology

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLOWER; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; POLLEN; WOOD;

CAESALPINIOIDEAE; CASSIEAE; FABACEAE; FABALES; PAPILIONOIDEAE;

EID: 57349144380     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800199     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. ARMSTRONG, J. E., AND A. W. DOUGLAS. 1989. The ontogenetic basis for corolla aestivation in Scrophulariaceae. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 116: 378-389.
2. AUBRÉVILLE, A. 1968. Légumineuses- Caesalpinioidées. In A. Aubréville [ed.], Flore du Gabon, vol. 15. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
3. BAILLON, H. E. 1865. Études sur l'herbier du Gabon du Musée des colonies Françaises. Adansonia 6: 188-230.
4. BAMERT, U. 1990. Aspekte der Struktur, Funktion und Diversität der Blüten bei Polygalaceae. Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich, ADAG, Zurich, Switzerland.
5. BANKS, H., S. FEIST-BURKHARDT, AND B. B. KLITGAARD. 2006. The unique pollen morphology of Duparquetia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Developmental evidence for aperture orientation using confocal microscopy. Annals of Botany 98: 107-115.
6. BARRETT, S. C. H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 274-284.
7. BELLO, M. A., J. A. HAWKINS, AND P. J. RUDALL. 2007. Floral morphology and development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the species-poor relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae. Annals of Botany 100: 1491-1505.
8. nd meeting of the European society for Evolutionary Developmental biology, 2008, University Ghent, Belgium. Lecture abstract 4.1.S1, 48-49, downloadable at website http://evodevo.eu/conferences/2008/.
9. BENLLOCH, R., C. NAVARRO, J. P. BELTRÁN, AND L. A. CAÑAS. 2003. Floral development of the model legume Medicago truncata: Ontogeny studies as a tool to better characterize homeotic mutations. Sexual Plant Reproduction 15: 231-241.
10. BENTHAM, G. 1865a. Description of some new genera and species of tropical Leguminosae. Transactions of the Linnean Society 25: 297-320.
11. BENTHAM, G. 1865b. Leguminosae. In G. Bentham, and J. D. Hooker [eds.], Genera plantarum, vol. 1, part II. Reeve, London, UK.
12. BERBEL, A., C. NAVARRO, C. FERRÁNDIZ, L. A. CAÑAS, J.-P. BELTRÁN, AND F. MADUEÑO. 2005. Functional conservation of PISTILLATA activity in a pea homolog lacking the PI motif. Plant Physiology 139: 174-185.
13. BOATWRIGHT, J. S., V. SAVOLAINEN, B.-E. VAN WYK, A. L. SCHUTTE-VLOK, F. FOREST, AND M. VAN DER BANK. 2008. Systematic position of the anomalous genus Cadia and the phylogeny of the tribe Podalyrieae (Fabaceae). Systematic Botany 33: 133-147.
14. BOIS, M. D. 1903. Contribution a l'étude de l'Oligostemon pictus Benth. Journal de Botanique 17: 16-23.
15. BRUNEAU, A., M. MERCURE, G. P. LEWIS, AND P. S. HERENDEEN. 2008. Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes. Botany 86: 697-718.
16. BUCHMANN, S. L. 1983. Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In C. E. Jones, and R. J. Little [eds.], Handbook of experimental pollination biology, 73-113. von Nostrand Reinhold, New York, New York, USA.
17. CHAPPILL, J. A. 1995. Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: The development of and explicit hypothesis. In M. Crisp and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 7, 1-10. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
18. CITERNE, H. L., R. T. PENNINGTON, AND Q. C. B. CRONK. 2006. An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 12017-12020.
19. COEN, E. S., AND E. M. MEYEROWITZ. 1991. The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 31-37.
20. CRONK, Q. C. B., AND I. OJEDA. 2008. Bird-pollination in an evolutionary and molecular context. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 715-727.
21. DAFNI, A., AND M. GIURFA. 1999. The functional ecology of floral guides in relation to insects behavior and vision. In S. P. Wasser [ed.], Evolutionary theory and processes: Modern perspectives. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
22. DIABATE, M., A. MUNIVE, S. MIANA DE FARIA, A. BA, B. DREYFUS, AND A. GALIANA. 2005. Occurrence of nodulation in unexplored leguminous trees native to the West African tropical rainforest and inoculation responses of native species useful in reforestation. New Phytologist 166: 231-239.
23. EICHLER, A. W. 1878 Blütendiagramme, 2. Theil. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
24. ENDRESS, P. K. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
25. ENDRESS, P. K. 2008. The whole and the parts: Relationships between floral architecture and floral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 95: 101-120.
26. FENG, X., Z. ZHAO, Z. TIAN, S. XU, Y. LUO, Z. CAI, Y. WANG, et al. 2006. Control of petal shape and floral zygomorphy in Lotus japonicus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 4970-4975.
27. FERGUSON, I. K. 1987. A preliminary survey of the pollen exine stratification in the Caesalpinioideae. In C. H. Stirton [ed.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 3, 355-385. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
28. GEMMEKE, V. 1982. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Mimosaceen-Blüten. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 103: 185-210.
29. GÓMEZ-ACEVEDO, S. L., S. MAGALLÓN, AND L. RICO-ARCE. 2007. Floral development in three species of Acacia (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae). Australian Journal of Botany 55: 30-41.
30. GRAHAM, A., AND G. BARKER. 1981. Palynology and tribal classification in the Caesalpinioideae. In R. M. Polhill, and P. H. Raven [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 2, 801-834. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
31. GRAHAM, A., G. BARKER, AND M. FREITAS DA SILVA. 1980. Unique pollen types in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae). Grana 19: 79-84.
32. HARDER, L. D., AND R. M. R. BARCLAY. 1994. The functional significance of poricidal anthers and buzz pollination: Controlled pollen removal from Dodecatheon. Functional Ecology 8: 509-517.
33. HARRIS, J. A. 1906. The anomalous anther-structure of Dicorynia, Duparquetia, and Strumpfia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 33: 223-228.
34. HERENDEEN, P. S., A. BRUNEAU, AND G. P. LEWIS. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in caesalpinioid legumes: Phylogenetic and biogeographical implications. In P. S. Herendeen and D. L. Dilcher [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 4, 303-316. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
35. HUTCHINSON, J., AND J. M. DALZIEL. 1928. Flora of west tropical Africa. Crown Agents, London, UK.
36. IRWIN, H. S., AND R. C. BARNEBY. 1981. Cassieae Bronn (1822). In R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 1, 97-106. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
37. JESSON, J. K., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2002a. Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemadoraceae): The influence of reproductive systems on the maintenance of the polymorphism. American Journal of Botany 89: 253-262.
38. JESSON, J. K., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 2002b. Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers. Nature 417: 707.
39. JESSON, J. K., J. KANG, S. L. WAGNER, S. C. H. BARRETT, AND N. G. DENGLER. 2003. The development of enantiostyly. American Journal of Botany 90: 183-195.
40. KLITGAARD, B. B. 1999. Floral ontogeny in tribe Dalbergieae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae): Dalbergia brasiliensis, Machaerium villosum s.l., Platymiscium floribundum and Pterocarpus rotundifolius. Plant Systematics and Evolution 219: 1-25.
41. LAVIN, M., P. S. HERENDEEN, AND M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI. 2005. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the Tertiary. Systematic Biology 54: 575-594.
42. LEWIS, G. P. 2005. Tribe Cassieae. In G. P. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock [eds.], Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
43. LEWIS, G. P., B. SCHRIRE, B. MACKINDER, AND M. LOCK [EDS.]. 2005. Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
44. LEWIS, G. P., B. B. SIMPSON, AND J. L. NEFF. 2000. Progress in understanding the reproductive biology of the Caesalpinioidee (Leguminosae). In P. S. Herendeen, and A. Bruneau [eds.], Advances in legume systematics 9, 65-78. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
45. MANSANO, V. F., S. C. TUCKER, AND A. M. G. A. TOZZI. 2002. Floral ontogeny of Lecointea, Zollernia, Exostyles, and Harleyodendron (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Swartzieae s.l.). American Journal of Botany 89: 1553-1569.
46. MARAZZI, B., E. CONTI, AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2007. Diversity in anthers and stigmas in the buzz-pollinated genus Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 168: 371-391.
47. MARAZZI, B., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2008. Patterns and development of floral asymmetry in Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae). American Journal of Botany 95: 22-40.
48. MATTHEWS, M. L., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2005. Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 149: 129-194.
49. MCMAHON, M. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships and floral evolution in the papilionoid legume clade Amorpheae. Brittonia 57: 397-411.
50. MCMAHON, M., and L. HUFFORD. 2005. Evolution and development in the amorphoid clade (Amorpheae: Papilionoideae: Leguminosae): Petal loss and dedifferentiation. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 383-396.
51. OLIVER, D. 1871 Flora of tropical Africa, vol. II, Leguminosae to Ficoideae. L. Reeve, London, UK.
52. OWENS, S. J., AND G. P. LEWIS. 1996. Stigma morphology in the Leguminosae: The wet papillate (WP) stigma in Caesalpinioideae. Kew Bulletin 51: 119-131.
53. PENNINGTON, R. T., B. B. KLITGAARD, H. IRELAND, AND M. LAVIN. 2000. New insights into floral evolution of basal Papilionoideae from molecular phylogenies. In P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 9, 233-248. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
54. POLHILL, R. M. 1994. Classification of the Leguminosae. In F. A. Bisby, J. Buckingham, and J. B. Harborne [eds.], Phytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae, vol 1, Plants and their constitutents, xxv-xlvii. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
55. PRENNER, G. 2003. Floral ontogeny in Lathyrus latifolius (Fabaceae-Vicieae). Phyton (Horn, Austria) 13: 392-400.
56. PRENNER, G. 2004a. Floral development in Daviesia cordata (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Mirbelieae) and its systematic implications. Australian Journal of Botany 52: 285-291.
57. PRENNER, G. 2004b. Floral development in Polygala myrtifolia (Polygalaceae) and its similarities with Leguminosae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 249: 67-76.
58. PRENNER, G. 2004c. Floral ontogeny in Calliandra angustifolia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: Ingeae) and its systematic implications. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 417-426.
59. PRENNER, G. 2004d. Floral ontogeny in Lespedeza thunbergii (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Desmodieae): Variations from the unidirectional mode of organ formation. Journal of Plant Research 117: 297-302.
60. PRENNER, G. 2004e. New aspects in floral development of Papilionoideae: Initiated but suppressed bracteoles and variable initiation of sepals. Annals of Botany 93: 537-545.
61. RAMÍREZ-DOMENECH, J. I., AND S. C. TUCKER. 1989. Phylogenetic implications of inflorescence and floral ontogeny of Mimosa strigillosa. American Journal of Botany 76: 1583-1593.
62. RONSE DE CRAENE, L. P. 2007. Are petals sterile stamens or bracts? The origin and evolution of petals in core eudicots. Annals of Botany 100: 621-630.
63. RUDALL, P. J., AND R. M. BATEMAN. 2004. Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers: Iterative patterns and developmental constraints. New Phytologist 162: 25-44.
64. RUDALL, P. J., G. MYERS, AND G. P. LEWIS. 1994. Floral secretory structures in Caesalpinia sensu lato and related genera. In I. K. Ferguson, and S. C. Tucker [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 6, 41-52. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
65. SCHRIRE, B. D., G. P. LEWIS, AND M. LAVIN. 2005. Biogeography of the Leguminosae. In G. P. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock [eds.], Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
66. SPRENT, J. I. 2001. Nodulation in legumes. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
67. SPRENT, J. I. 2007. Evolving ideas of legume evolution and diversity: A taxonomic perspective on the occurrence of nodulation. New Phytologist 174: 11-25.
68. STEYAERT, R. L. 1952. Caesalpiniaceae (Cassieae). Flora du Congo belge et du Ruanda-Urundi. Spermatophytes 3: 496-545.
69. STRANGE, A., P. J. RUDALL, AND C. J. PRYCHID. 2004. Comparative floral anatomy of Pontederiaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 144: 395-408.
70. THOMSON, J. D., AND P. WILSON. 2008. Explaining evolutionary shifts between bee and hummingbird pollination: Convergence, divergence, and directionality. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 23-38.
71. THORP, R. W. 2000. The collection of pollen by bees. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 211-223.
72. TUCKER, S. C. 1987. Floral initiation and development in legumes. In C. H. Stirton [ed.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 3, 183-239. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
73. TUCKER, S. C. 1988. Loss versus suppression of floral organs. In P. Leins, S. C. Tucker, and P. K. Endress [eds.], Aspects of floral development, 69-82. J. Cramer, Berlin, Germany.
74. TUCKER, S. C. 1989. Overlapping organ initiation and common primordia in flowers of Pisum sativum (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). American Journal of Botany 76: 714-729.
75. TUCKER, S. C. 1990. Loss of floral organs in Ateleia (Leguminosae: Paplionoideae: Sophoreae). American Journal of Botany 77: 750-761.
76. TUCKER, S. C. 1991. Helical floral organogenesis in Gleditsia, a primitive caesalpinioid legume. American Journal of Botany 78: 1130-1149.
77. TUCKER, S. C. 1992. The developmental basis for sexual expression in Ceratonia siliqua (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae). American Journal of Botany 79: 318-327.
78. TUCKER, S. C. 1994. Floral ontogeny in Sophoreae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). II. Sophora sensu lato ( Sophora Group). American Journal of Botany 81: 368-380.
79. TUCKER, S. C. 1996a. Stamen structure and development in legumes, with emphasis on poricidal stamens of caesalpinioid tribe Cassieae. In W. G. D'Arcy and R. C. Keating [eds.], The anther: Form function and phylogeny, 236-254. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
80. TUCKER, S. C. 1996b. Trends in evolution of floral ontogeny in Cassia sensu stricto, Senna, and Chamaecrista (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae: Cassiinae); a study in convergence. American Journal of Botany 83: 687-711.
81. TUCKER, S. C. 1998. Floral ontogeny in legume genera Petalostylis, Labichea, and Dialium (Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae), a series in floral reduction. American Journal of Botany 85: 184-208.
82. TUCKER, S. C. 1999. Evolutionary lability of symmetry in early floral development. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 (6 Supplement ): S25-S39.
83. TUCKER, S. C. 2000a. Evolutionary loss of sepals and/or petals in detarioid legume taxa Aphanocalyx, Brachystegia, and Monopetalanthus (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). American Journal of Botany 87: 608-624.
84. TUCKER, S. C. 2000b. Floral development and homeosis in Saraca (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 537-549.
85. TUCKER, S. C. 2000c. Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. American Journal of Botany 87: 1385-1407.
86. TUCKER, S. C. 2000d. Organ loss in detarioid and other leguminous flowers, and the possibility of saltatory evolution. In P. S. Herendeen, and A. Bruneau [eds.], Advances in legume systematics, vol. 9, 107-120. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
87. TUCKER, S. C. 2001a. Floral development in Schotia and Cynometra (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1164-1180.
88. TUCKER, S. C. 2001b. The ontogenetic basis for missing petals in Crudia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 83-89.
89. TUCKER, S. C. 2002a. Floral ontogeny in Sophoreae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). III. Radial symmetry and random petal aestivation in Cadia purpurea. American Journal of Botany 89: 748-757.
90. TUCKER, S. C. 2002b. Floral ontogeny of Cercis (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Cercideae): Does it show convergence with papilionoids? International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 75-87.
91. TUCKER, S. C. 2003a. Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiology 131: 911-926.
92. TUCKER, S. C. 2003b. Floral ontogeny in Swartzia (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Swartzieae): Distribution and role of the ring meristem. American Journal of Botany 90: 1271-1292.
93. VAN DER MAESEN, L. J. G. 1970. A revision of the genus Cadia Forskae (Caes.) and some remarks regarding Dicraeopetalum Harms (Pap.) and Platycelyphium (Harms) (Pap.). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 19: 227-248.
94. VOGEL, S. 1990. The role of scent glands in pollination. On the structure and function of osmophores. Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington, D.C., USA.
95. WANG, Z., Y. LUO, X. LI, L. WANG, S. XU, J. YANG, L. WENG, et al. 2008. Genetic control of floral zygomorphy in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 10414-10419.
96. WESTERKAMP, C. 1997. Keel blossoms: Bee flowers with adaptations against bees. Flora 192: 125-132.