Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes

Botany

Volumn 86, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 697-718

  Bruneau, Anne ^a   Mercure, Marjorie ^a   Lewis, Gwilym P ^b   Herendeen, Patrick S ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Divergence time estimates; Fossil calibration; Leguminosae; matK trnK; Phylogenetic analyses; trnL

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CLADISTICS; DIVERGENCE; ESTIMATION METHOD; EVOLUTION; FOSSIL; GENETIC ANALYSIS; LEGUME; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

BAUHINIA; CAESALPINIA; CAESALPINIOIDEAE; CERCIDEAE; DETARIEAE; FABACEAE; MIMOSOIDEAE; PAPILIONOIDEAE; PELTOPHORUM; PRIORIA; SENNA; TACHIGALI;

EID: 47649128067     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B08-058     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Adegoke, O.S., Jan du Chene, R.E., Agumana, A.E., and Ajayi, P.O. 1978. Palynology and age of the Kerri-Kerri Formation, Nigeria. Rev. Esp. Micropaleontol. 10: 267-283.
2. Archambault, A., and Bruneau, A. 2004. Phylogenetic utility of the LEAFY/FLORICAULA gene in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae): gene duplication and a novel insertion. Syst. Bot. 29: 609-626. doi:10.1600/0363644041744374.
3. Banks, H., Klitgaard, B.B., Lewis, G.P., Crane, P.R., and Bruneau, A. 2003. Pollen and the systematics of tribes Caesalpinieae and Cassieae (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 95-122.
4. Barneby, R.C. 1996. Neotropical Fabales at NY: asides and oversights. Brittonia, 48: 174-187. doi:10.2307/2807811.
5. Bello, M.A., Bruneau, A., Forest, F., and Hawkins, J.A. 2008. Elusive relationships within order Fabales: phylogenetic analyses using matK and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. In press.
6. Breteler, F.J. 1995. The boundary between Amherstieae and Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 7. Phylogeny. Edited by M.D. Crisp and J.J. Doyle. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 53-61.
7. Breteler, F.J. 1999. A revision of Prioria, including Gossweilerodendron, Kingiodendron, Oxystigma, and Pterygopodium (Leguminosae - Caesalpinioideae - Detarieae) with emphasis on Africa. Agric. Univ. Wagening. Pap. 99: 1-61.
8. Bruneau, A., and Breteler, F.J., Wieringa, J.J., Gervais, G.Y.F., and Forest, F. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 121-149.
9. Bruneau, A., Forest, F., Herendeen, P.S., Klitgaard, B.B., and Lewis, G.P. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Syst. Bot. 26: 487-514.
10. Calvillo-Canadell, L., and Cevallos-Ferriz, S.R.S. 2002. Bauhcis moranii gen. et sp. nov. (Cercideae, Caesalpinieae), an Oligocene plant from Tepexi de Rodriguez, Puebla, Mex., with leaf architecture similar to Bauhinia and Cercis. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 122: 171-184. doi:10.1016/S0034-6667(02)00135-5.
11. Calvillo-Canadell, L., and Cevallos-Ferriz, S.R.S. 2005. Diverse assemblage of Eocene and Oligocene leguminosae from Mexico. Int. J. Plant Sci. 166: 671-692. doi:10.1086/430096.
12. Chappill, J.A. 1995. Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: the development of an explicit hypothesis. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 7. Phylogeny. Edited by M.D. Crisp and J.J. Doyle. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 1-9.
13. Chase, M.W., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G., Morgan, D., Les, D.H., Mishler, B.D., Duvall, M.R., Price, R.A., Hills, H.G., Qiu, Y.-L., Kron, K.A., Rettig, J.H., Conti, E., Palmer, J.D., Manhart, J.R., Sytsma, K.J., Michaels, H.J., Kress, W.J., Karol, K.G., Clark, W.D., Hedrén, M., Gaut, B.S., Jansen, R.K., Kim, K.-J., Wimpee, C.F., Smith, J.F., Furnier, G.R., Strauss, S.H., Xiang, Q.-Y., Plunkett, G.M., Soltis, P.S., Swensen, S.M., Williams, S.E., Gadek, P.A., Quinn, C.J., Eguiarte, L.E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G.H., Graham, S.W., Barret, S.C.H., Dayanandan, S., and Albert, V.A. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580. doi:10.2307/2399846.
14. Chen, Y.F., and Zhang, D.X. 2005. Bauhinia larsenii, a fossil legume from Guangxi, China. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 147: 437-440. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00373.x.
15. Choi, H.K., Luckow, M.A., Doyle, J., and Cook, D.R. 2006. Development of nuclear gene-derived molecular markers linked to legume genetic maps. Mol. Genet. Genom. 276: 56-70. doi:10.1007/s00438-006-0118-8.
16. Cowan, R.S., and Polhill, R.M. 1981a. Detarieae DC. (1825). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 117-134.
17. Cowan, R.S., and Polhill, R.M. 1957b. Amherstieae Benth. emend. J. Léon. (1957). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 135-142.
18. Crawley, M. 1988. Palaeocene wood from the Republic of Mali. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol. 44: 3-14.
19. Crepet, W.L., and Dilcher, D.L. 1977. Investigations of angiosperms from the Eocene of North America: a mimosoid inflorescence. Am. J. Bot. 64: 714-725. doi:10.2307/2441724.
20. Crepet, W.L., and Herendeen, P.S. 1992. Papilionoid flowers from the early Eocene of southeastern North America. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 43-55.
21. Crepet, W.L., and Taylor, D.W. 1985. The diversification of the Leguminosae: first fossil evidence of the Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae. Science (Wash.), 228: 1087-1089. doi:10.1126/science.228.4703.1087.
22. Crepet, W.L., and Taylor, D.W. 1986. Primitive mimosoid flowers from the Paleocene-Eocene and their systematic and evolutionary implications. Am. J. Bot. 73: 548-563. doi:10.2307/2444261.
23. Crepet, W.L., Nixon, K.C., and Gandolfo, M.A. 2004. Fossil evidence and phylogeny: the age of major angiosperm clades based on mesofossil and macrofossil evidence from Cretaceus deposits. Am. J. Bot. 91: 1666-1682. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1666.
24. De Franceschi, D., and De Ploëg, G. 2003. Origine de l'ambre des faciès sparnaciens (Éocène inférieur) du Bassin de Paris: le bois de l'ambre producteur. Geodiversitas, 25: 633-647.
25. Doyle, J.J., and Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
26. Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L., Ballenger, J.A., Dickson, E.E., Kajita, T., and Ohashi, H. 1997. A phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. Am. J. Bot. 84: 541-554. doi:10.2307/2446030.
27. Doyle, J.J., Chappill, J.A., Bailey, C.D., and Kajita, T. 2000. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequences and non-molecular data. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 1-20.
28. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Alikelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16: 183-196. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb01847.x.
29. Forest, F., Bruneau, A., Hawkins, J.A., Kajita, T., Doyle, J.J., and Crane, P.R. 2002. The sister of the Leguminosae revealed: phylogenetic relationships in the Fabales determined using trnL and rbcL sequences. In Proceedings of Botany 2002 - Botany in the Curriculum: Integrating Research and Teaching [online]. 2-4 August 2002. Madison, Wisc. Available from bsa2002. scientific-conference.net/section12/abstracts/101.shtml [accessed 11 February 2008].
30. Forest, F., Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Lupia, R., Bruneau, A., and Crane, P.R. 2005. Teasing apart molecular- versus fossil-based error estimates when dating phylogenetic trees: a case study in the birch family (Betulaceae). Syst. Bot. 30: 118-133. doi:10.1600/0363644053661850.
31. Fortunato, R.H. 2005. Mimozygantheae. In Legumes of the world. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 184-185.
32. Fougère-Danezan, M. 2005. Phylogénie moléculaire et morphologique des Detarieae résinifères (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Contribution à l'étude de l'histoire biogéographique des légumineuses. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Montréal (Montréal, Que.) and Université Paul Sabatier (Toulouse III, Toulouse, France).
33. Fougère-Danezan, M., Maumont, S., and Bruneau, A. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 161-180.
34. Fougère-Danezan, M., Maumont, S., and Bruneau, A. 2007. Relationships among resin producing Detarieae s. l. (Leguminosae) as inferred by molecular data. Syst. Bot. 32: 748-761.
35. Gervais, G.Y.F., and Bruneau, A. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of a polyphyletic African genus of Caesalpinioideae (Fabaceae): Monopetalanthus Harms. Plant Syst. Evol. 235: 19-34. doi:10.1007/s00606-002-0222-0.
36. Graham, A. 1985. Studies in neotropical paleobotany. IV. The Eocene communities of Panama. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72: 504-534. doi:10.2307/2399101.
37. Graham, A. 1989. Studies in neotropical paleobotany. VII. The Lower Miocene communities of Panama - The La Boca Formation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 76: 50-66. doi:10.2307/2399342.
38. Graham, A. 1992. The current status of the legume fossil record in the Caribbean region. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 161-167.
39. Graham, A., and Jarzen, D.M. 1969. Studies in neotropical paleobotany. I. The Oligocene communities of Puerto Rico. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 56: 308-357. doi:10.2307/2394849.
40. Guinet, Ph. 1981. Mimosoideae: the characters of their pollen grains. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 835-855.
41. Guinet, Ph. 1990. The genus Acacia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae); its affinities as borne out by its pollen characters. Plant Syst. Evol. 5(Suppl.): 81-90.
42. Guinet, Ph., and Lugardon, B. 1976. Diversité des structures de l'exine dans le genre Acacia (Mimosaceae). Pollen Spores, 18: 483-511.
43. Guinet, Ph., El Sabrouty, M.N., Soliman, H.A., and Omran, A.M. 1987. Étude des caractères du pollen des légumineuses-Mimosoideae des sédiments Tertiaires du nord-ouest de l'Égypte. Mém. Trav. E.P.H.E. Inst. Montpellier, 17: 159-171.
44. Haston, E.M., Lewis, G.P., and Hawkins, J.A. 2003. A phylogenetic investigation of the Peltophorum group (Caesalpinieae: Leguminosae). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics. Edited by A. Bruneau and B.B. Klitgaard. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 149-159.
45. Haston, E.M., Lewis, G.P., and Hawkins, J.A. 2005. A phylogenetic reappraisal of the Peltophorum group (Caesalpinieae: Leguminosae) based on the chloroplast trnL-F, rbcL and rps16 sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 92: 1359-1371. doi:10.3732/ajb.92.8.1359.
46. Herendeen, P.S. 1992. The fossil history of the Leguminosae from the Eocene of southeastern North America. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 85-160.
47. Herendeen, P.S. 2000. Structural evolution in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 45-64.
48. Herendeen, P.S., and Crane, P.R. 1992. Early caesalpinioid fruits from the Palaeogene of southern England. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 57-68.
49. Herendeen, P.S., and Dilcher, D.L. 1990. Reproductive and vegetative evidence for the occurrence of Crudia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) in the Eocene of Southeastern North-America. Bot. Gaz. 151: 402-413. doi:10.1086/337840.
50. Herendeen, P.S., and Dilcher, D.L. 1991. Caesalpinia subgenus Mezoneuron (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) from the Tertiary of North America. Am. J. Bot. 78: 1-12. doi:10.2307/2445223.
51. Herendeen, P.S., and Jacobs, B.F. 2000. Fossil legumes from the Middle Eocene (46.0 Ma) Mahenge Flora of Singida, Tanzania. Am. J. Bot. 87: 1358-1366. doi:10.2307/2656727. PMID:10991905.
52. Herendeen, P.S., and Manchester, S.R. 2004. Fruits and foliage of Cercis from the Late Eocene of Oregon. In Proceedings of Botany 2004 - Alpine Diversity: Adapted to the Peaks [online]. 31 July-5 August 2004. Snowbird resort, Salt Lake city, Utah. Available from www.botanyconference.org [accessed 11 February 2008].
53. Herendeen, P.S., and Wing, S. 2001. Papilionoid legume fruits and leaves from the Paleocene of northwestern Wyoming. In Proceedings of Botany 2001 - Plants and People [online]. 12-16 August 2001. Albuquerque Convention Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Available from www.botany2001.org/section7/abstracts/ 26.shtml [accessed 11 February 2008]..
54. Herendeen, P.S., Crepet, W.L., and Dilcher, D.L. 1992. The fossil history of the Leguminosae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 303-316.
55. Herendeen, P.S., Bruneau, A., and Lewis, G.P. 2003a. Phylogenetic relationships in the caesalpinioid legumes: a preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics. Edited by B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 37-62.
56. Herendeen, P.S., Lewis, G.P., and Bruneau, A. 2003b. Floral morphology in caesalpinioid legumes: testing the monophyly of the "Umtiza" clade. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: S393-S407. doi:10.1086/376881.
57. Hu, J.-M., Lavin, M., Wojciechowski, M.F., and Sanderson, M.J. 2000. Phylogenetic systematics of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast trnK/matK sequences and its implications for evolutionary patterns in Papilionoideae. Am. J. Bot. 87: 418-430. doi:10.2307/2656638. PMID:10719003.
58. Hueber, F.M., and Langenheim, J. 1986. Dominican amber tree had African ancestors. Geotimes, 31: 8-10.
59. Huelsenbeck, J.P., and Ronquist, F.R. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17: 754-755. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17. 8.754. PMID:11524383.
60. Hugall, A.F., Foster, R., and Lee, M.S.Y. 2007. Calibration choice, rate smoothing, and the pattern of tetrapod diversification according to the long nuclear gene RAG-1. Syst. Biol. 56: 543-563. doi:10.1080/ 10635150701477825. PMID:17654361.
61. Ireland, H., Pennington, R.T., and Preston, J. 2000. Molecular systematics of the Swartzieae. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 217-231.
62. Irwin, H.S., and Barneby, R.C. 1981. Cassieae. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 97-106.
63. Iturralde-Vinent, M.A., and MacPhee, R.D.E. 1996. Age and paleogeographical origin of Dominican amber. Science (Wash.), 273: 1850-1852. doi:10.1126/science.273.5283.1850.
64. Jacobs, B.F., and Herendeen, P.S. 2004. Eocene dry climate and woodland vegetation in tropical Africa reconstructed from fossil leaves from northern Tanzania. Palaeogreogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 213: 115-123.
65. Joly, S., Starr, J.R., Lewis, W.H., and Bruneau, A. 2006. Polyploid and hybrid evolution in roses east of the Rocky Mountains. Am. J. Bot. 93: 412-425. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.3.412.
66. Kajita, T., Ohashi, H., Tateishi, Y., Bailey, C. D., and Doyle, J. J.·2001. RbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Syst. Bot. 26: 515-536.
67. Käss, E., and Wink, M. 1996. Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: phylogeny of the three subfamilies based on rbcL-sequences. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 24: 365-378. doi:10.1016/0305-1978(96)00032-4.
68. Kelchner, S.A. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application to plant systematics. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 87: 482-498. doi:10.2307/2666142.
69. Klitgaard, B.B., Forest, F., Bruneau, A., and Banks, H. 2002. Duparquetia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): an enigmatic basal legume with orchid-like flowers. In Proceedings of Flowers: diversity, development and evolution. 5-7 July 2002. Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland..
70. Kosakovsky Pond, S.L., Frost, S.D.W., and Muse, S.V. 2005. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies [online]. Bioinformatics, 2: 676-679. Available from www.hyphy.org/[accessed 26 November 2007].
71. Langenheim, J.H. 2003. Plant resins: chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
72. Lavin, M., Thulin, M., Labat, J.-N., and Pennington, R.T. 2000. Africa, the odd man out: molecular biogeographic studies of dalbergioid legumes (Fabaceae) suggest otherwise. Syst. Bot. 25: 449-467. doi:10.2307/2666689.
73. Lavin, M., Schrire, B.D., Lewis, G.P., Pennington, R.T., Delgado-Salinas, A., Thulin, M., Hughes, C.E., Beyra Matos, A., and Wojciechowski, M.F. 2004. Metacommunity process rather than continental tectonic history better explains geographically structured phylogenies in legumes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359: 1509-1522. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1536. PMID:15519969.
74. Lavin, M., Herendeen, P.S., and Wojciechowski, M.F. 2005. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst. Biol. 54: 575-594. doi:10.1080/ 10635150590947131. PMID:16085576.
75. Léonard, J. 1957. Genera des Cynometreae et des Amherstieae africaines (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Mémoires de la Classe des sciences, Académie Royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique, memoires 8, 30(2): 3-312.
76. Lewis, G.P. 2005. Caesalpinieae. In Legumes of the world. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 127-161.
77. Lewis, G.P., and Forest, F. 2005. Cercideae. In Legumes of the world. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 57-67.
78. Lewis, G.P., and Schrire, B.D. 1995. A reappraisal of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae) using phylogenetic analysis. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 7. Phylogeny. Edited by M.D. Crisp and J.J. Doyle. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 41-52.
79. Lewis, G.P., Schrire, B., Mackinder, B., and Lock, M. 2005. Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK.
80. Luckow, M., White, P.J., and Bruneau, A. 2000. Relationships among the basal genera of mimosoid legumes. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 165-180.
81. Luckow, M., Miller, J.T., Murphy, D.J., and Livshultz, T. 2003. A phylogenetic analysis of the Mimosoideae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast DNA sequence data. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 197-220.
82. MacGinitie, H.D. 1953. Fossil plants of the Florissant Beds, Colorado. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications. Publ. 599: i-iii, 1-198.
83. Mackinder, B. 2005. Tribe Detarieae. In Legumes of the world. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 68-109.
84. Magallón, S.A. 2004. Dating lineages: molecular and paleontological approaches to the temporal framework of clades. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165: S7-S21. doi:10.1086/383336.
85. Magallón, S.A., and Sanderson, M.J. 2001. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution, 55: 1762-1780. PMID:11681732.
86. Magallón, S.A., and Sanderson, M.J. 2005. Angiosperm divergence times: The effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints. Evolution, 59: 1653-1670. doi:10.1554/04-565.1. PMID:16329238.
87. Marazzi, B., Endress, P.K., De Queiroz, L.P., and Conti, E. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships within Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae) based on three chloroplast DNA regions: Patterns in the evolution of floral symmetry and extrafloral nectarines. Am. J. Bot. 93: 288-303. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.2. 288.
88. Mildenhall, D.C. 1972. Fossil pollen of Acacia type from New Zealand. N.Z. J. Bot. 10: 485-494.
89. Muller, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 47: 1-142. doi:10.1007/BF02860537.
90. Near, T.J., and Sanderson, M.J. 2004. Assessing the quality of molecular divergence time estimates by fossil calibrations and fossil-based model selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359: 1477-1483. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1523. PMID:15519966.
91. Near, T.J., Meylan, P.A., and Shaffer, H.B. 2005. Assessing concordance of fossil calibration points in molecular clock studies: an example using turtles. Am. Nat. 165: 137-146. doi:10.1086/427734. PMID:15729646.
92. Pennington, R.T., Klitgaard, B.B., Ireland, H., and Lavin, M. 2000. New insights into floral evolution of basal Papilionoideae from molecular phylogenies. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Edited by P.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 233-248.
93. Pennington, R.T., Lavin, M., Ireland, H., Klitgaard, B.B., Preston, J., and Hu, J.-M. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of basal papilionoid legumes based upon sequences of the chloroplast intron trnL. Syst. Bot. 26: 537-556.
94. Poinar, G., and Poinar, R. 1999. The amber forest. A reconstruction of a vanished world. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
95. Poinar, H.N., Cano, R.J., and Poinar, G.O.J. 1993. DNA from an extinct plant. Nature (London), 363: 677. doi:10.1038/363677a0.
96. Polhill, R.M. 1981. Papilionoideae. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 191-208.
97. Polhill, R.M. 1994. Complete synopsis of legume genera. In Phytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae. Vol. 1. Plants and their constituents. Edited by F.A. Bisby, J. Buckingham, and J.B. Harborne. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. pp. xlix-liv.
98. Polhill, R.M., and Vidal, J.E. 1981. Caesalpinieae. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 81-96.
99. Polhill, R.M., Raven, P.H., and Stirton, C.H. 1981. Evolution and systematics of the Leguminosae. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 1-26.
100. Posada, D., and Crandall, K.A. 1998. ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution [online]. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818. Available from darwin.uvigo.es/software/modeltest.html [accessed 25 September 2007]. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. PMID:9918953.
101. Rambaut, A., and Drummond, A.J. 2007. Tracer version 1.4 [online]. Available from tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ [accessed 30 July 2007]. .
102. Redden, K.M., and Herendeen, P.S. 2006. Morphology and phylogenetic analysis of Paloue and related genera in the Brownea clade (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 167: 1229-1246. doi:10.1086/508065.
103. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., and van der Mark, P. 2005. Mr. Bayes 3.1 manual [online]. Available from mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/mb3.1_manual.pdf [accessed 14 February 2008].
104. Rutschmann, F. 2006. Molecular dating of phylogenetic trees: a brief review of current methods that estimate divergence times. Divers. Distrib. 12: 35-48. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00210.x.
105. Rutschmann, F., Eriksson, T., Abu Salim, K., and Conti, E. 2007. Assessing calibration uncertainty in molecular dating: the assignment of fossils to alternative calibration points. Syst. Biol. 56: 591-608. doi:10.1080/10635150701491156. PMID:17654364.
106. Salard-Cheboldaeff, M. 1978. Sur la palynoflore Maestrichtienne et Tertiaire du Bassin sédimentaire Littoral du Cameroun. Pollen Spores, 20: 215-260.
107. Sanderson, M.J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 101-109. PMID:11752195.
108. Sanderson, M.J. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock [online]. Bioinformatics, 19: 301-302. Available from loco.biosci.arizona.edu/r8s/ [accessed 24 July 2007]. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301. PMID:12538260.
109. Sanderson, M.J. 2004. r8s: version 1.7. User's manual [online]. Available from loco.biosci.arizona.edu/r8s/r8s1.7.manual.pdf [accessed 30 December 2004].
110. Sanderson, M.J., Thorne, J.L., Wikstrom, N., and Bremer, K. 2004. Molecular evidence on plant divergence times. Am. J. Bot. 91: 1656-1665. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1656.
111. Schrire, B.D., Lavin, M., and Lewis, G.P. 2005a. Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies. In Plant diversity and complexity patterns: local, regional and global dimensions. Edited by I. Friis and H. Balslev. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter, 55: 375-422.
112. Schrire, B.D., Lewis, G.P., and Lavin, M. 2005b. Biogeography of the Leguminosae. In Legumes of the world. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 21-54.
113. Simmons, M.P., and Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381. doi:10.1080/10635159950173889. PMID:12118412.
114. Simpson, B.B., and Lewis, G.P. 2003. New combinations in Pomaria (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Kew Bull. 58: 175-184. doi:10.2307/4119360.
115. Simpson, B.B., Larkin, L.L., and Weeks, A. 2003. Progress towards resolving the relationships of the Caesalpinia Group (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 123-148.
116. Sinou, C., Bruneau, A., Forest, F., and Lewis, G.P. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Bauhinia (Leguminosae: Caesalpiniodeae: Cercideae) [online]. In Proceedings of Botany and Plant Biology 2007 Joint Congress. 7-11 July 2007. Chicago, Ill. Available from www.2007.botanyconference.org/ engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=1135 [accessed 11 February 2008].
117. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Nickrent, D., Johnson, L.A., Hahn, W.H., Hoot, S.B., Sweere, J.A., Kuzoff, R.B., Kron, K.A., Chase, M.W., Swensen, S.M., Zimmer, E.A., Chaw, S.-M., Gillespie, L.J., Kress, W.J., and Systsma, K.J. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 84: 1-49. doi:10.2307/2399952.
118. Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Savolainen, V., Crane, P.R., and Barraclough, T.G. 2002. Rate heterogeneity among lineages of Tracheophytes: integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence for molecular living fossils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 4430-4435. doi:10.1073/pnas.032087199. PMID:11917101.
119. Sprent, J.I. 2007. Evolving ideas of legume evolution and diversity: a taxonomic perspective on the occurrence of nodulation. New Phytol. 174: 11-25. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02015.x. PMID:17335493.
120. Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP* - Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
121. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., and Higgins, D.G. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882. doi:10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.
122. Tucker, S.C. 2002a. Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). 1. Radially symmetrical taxa lacking organ suppression. Am. J. Bot. 89: 875-887. doi:10.3732/ajb.89.6.875.
123. Tucker, S.C. 2002b. Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). 2. Zygomorphic taxa with petal and stamen suppression. Am. J. Bot. 89: 888-907. doi:10.3732/ajb.89.6.888.
124. Tucker, S.C. 2003. Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiol. 131: 911-926. doi:10.1104/pp.102.017459. PMID:12644644.
125. Wieringa, J.J. 1999. Monopetalanthus exit. A systematic study of Aphanocalyx, Bikinia, Icuria, Michelsonia and Tetraberlinia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Agric. Univ. Wagening. Pap. 99-4: 1-320.
126. Wieringa, J.J., and Gervais, G.Y.F. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses of combined morphological and molecular data sets on the Aphanocalyx-Bikinia- Tetraberlinioa group (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae s.l.). In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. pp. 181-196.
127. Wojciechowski, M.F. 2003. Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): an early 21st century perspective. In Advances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics. Edited by B.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 5-35.
128. Wojciechowski, M.F., Lavin, M., and Sanderson, M.J. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am. J. Bot. 91: 1846-1862. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.11.1846.
129. Wunderlin, R., Larsen, K., and Larsen, S.S. 1981. Cercideae. Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Edited by R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 107-116.
130. Young, N.D., and Healy, J. 2003. Gapcoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 4: 6. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-6. PMID:12689349.