Relationships among resin-producing Detarieae s.l. (Leguminosae) as inferred by molecular data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 748-761

  Fougère Danezan, Marie ^a   Maumont, Stéphan ^b   Bruneau, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b École Nationale de Formation Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Bicyclic diterpenes; Caesalpinioideae; Internal transcribed spacer; Phylogeny; Resins; trnL L region

Indexed keywords

CAESALPINIOIDEAE; COLOPHOSPERMUM; DETARIEAE; DETARIUM; EPERUA; FABACEAE; HARDWICKIA; HYMENAEA; PRIORIA;

EID: 38349187653     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364407783390755     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. ARCHAMBAULT, A. and A. BRUNEAU. 2004. Phylogenetic utility of the LEAFY/FLORICAULA gene in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae): gene duplication and a novel insertion. Systematic Botany 29: 609-626.
3. BAILEY, C. D., T. G. CARR, S. A. HARRIS, and C. E. HUGHES. 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 435-455.
4. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
5. BANKS, H. 2003. Structure of pollen apertures in the Detarieae sensu stricto (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae), with particular reference to underlying structures (Zwischenkörper). Annals of Botany 92: 425-435.
6. _ and P. E. GASSON. 2000. Pollen morphology and wood anatomy of the Crudia group (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 19-59.
7. _ and B. B. KLITGAARD. 2000. Palynological contribution to the systematics of Detarioid legumes (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Pp. 79-106 in Advances in Legumes Systematics Part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
8. BARETTA-KUIPERS, T. 1981. Wood anatomy of Leguminosae : its relevance to taxonomy. Pp. 677-705 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 2, eds. R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
9. BARRIEL, V. 1994. Phylogénies moléculaires et insertions - délétions de nucléotides. C.R. Académie des Sciences, Paris, Sciences de la vie 317: 693-701.
10. BOHLMAN, J., G. MEYER-GAUEN, and R. CROTEAU. 1998. Plant terpenoid synthases: molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science USA 95: 4126-4133.
11. BRETELER, F. J. 1995. The boundary between Amherstieae and Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae). Pp. 53-61 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 7, eds. M. D. Crisp and J. J. Doyle. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
12. _. 1999. A revision of Prioria, including Gossweilerodendron, Kingiodendron, Oxystigma, and Pterygopodium (Leguminoseae- Caesalpinioideae-Detarieae) with emphasis on Africa. Wageningen Agricultural Papers 99: 1-61.
13. _, I. K. FERGUSON, P. E. GASSON, and B. J. H. T. WELLE. 1997. Colophospermum reduced to Hardwickia (Leguminoseae-Caesalpinioideae). Adansonia série 3 19: 279-291.
14. BRUNEAU, A., F. J. BRETELER, J. J. WIERINGA, G. Y. F. GERVAIS, and F. FOREST. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Pp. 121-149 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
15. _, F. FOREST, P. S. HERENDEEN, B. B. KLITGAARD, and G. P. LEWIS. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from the chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Systematic Botany 26: 487-514.
16. BUCKLER, E. S. and T. P. HOLTSFORD. 1996. Zea systematics - Ribosomal ITS evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 612-622.
17. COLEMAN, A. W. 2002. Comparison of Eudorina/Pleodorina ITS sequences of isolates from nature with those from experimental hybrids. American Journal of Botany 89: 1523-1530.
18. COWAN, R. S. and R. M. POLHILL. 1981. Detarieae DC. (1957). Pp. 117-134 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 1, eds. R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
19. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
20. DALLAS-WANG, Q., G. JIANG, and F. M. SLADEK. 1998. Avoiding false positives in colony PCR. BioTechniques 24: 580-582.
21. DE WIT, H. D. C. 1954. Spicilegium Malaianum II. Webbia 9: 455-464.
22. DOUZERY, E. J. P., A. M. PRIDGEON, P. KORES, H. P. LINDER, H. KURZWEIL, and M. W. CHASE. 1999. Molecular phylogenetics of Diseae (Orchidaceae): a contribution from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. American Journal of Botany 86: 887-899.
23. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
24. DUARTE-ALMEIDA, J. M., G. NEGRI, and A. SALATINO. 2004. Volatile oils in the leaves of Bauhinia (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 747-753.
25. FARRIS, J. S., V. A. ALBERT, M. KÄLLERSJÖ , D. LIPSCOMB, and A. G. KLUGE. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
26. _, A. G. KLUGE, M. KÄLLERSJÖ , and C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
27. FOUGÈRE-DANEZAN, M. 2005. Phylogénie moléculaire et morphologique des Detarieae résinifères (Leguminosae : Caesalpinioideae). Contribution à l'étude de l'histoire biogéographique des légumineuses. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Montréal and Université Paul Sabatier (Toulouse III).
28. _, S. MAUMONT, and A. BRUNEAU. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. Pp. 161-180 in Advances in Legume Systematic Part 10, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
29. GASSON, P., C. TRAFFORD, and B. MATTHEWS. 2003. Wood anatomy of Caesalpinioideae. Pp. 63-93 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 10, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
30. GERVAIS, G. Y. F. and A. BRUNEAU. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of a polyphyletic African genus of Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae): Monopetalanthus Harms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 235: 19-34.
31. GOERTZEN, L. R., J. J. CANNONE, R. R. GUTELL, and R. K. JANSEN. 2003. ITS secondary structure derived from comparative analysis: implications for sequence alignment and phlogeny of the Asteraceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 216-234.
32. GOLDBLATT, P. 1981. Cytology and the phylogeny of Leguminosae. in Advances in Legume Sytematics Part 2, eds. R. M. Polhill and P. M. Raven. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
33. HAO, G., D. X. ZHANG, L. X. GUO, L. Y. ZHANG, Y. F. DENG, and X. Y. WEN. 2001. A phylogenetic and biogeographic study of Cercis (Leguminosae). Acta Botanica Sinica 43: 1275-1278.
34. HEGNAUER, R. and M. HEGNAUER. 1994. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen: Leguminosae. Band 11a. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
35. HERENDEEN, P. S. 2000. Structural evolution in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae). Pp. 45-64 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
36. HERSHKOVITZ, M. A., E. A. ZIMMER, and W. J. HAHN. 1999. Ribosomal DNA sequences and angiosperm systematics. Pp. 268-326 in Molecular systematics and plant evolution, eds. P. M. Hollingsworth, R. M. Bateman, and R. J. Gornall. London: Taylor & Francis.
37. HIGGINS, D. G. and P. M. SHARP. 1989. Fast and sensitive multiple sequence alignments on a microcomputer. Computer Application in the Biosciences 5: 151-153.
38. _, A. J. BLEASBY, and R. FUCKS. 1992. CLUSTAL V: improved software for the multiple sequence alignment. Computer Application in the Biosciences 8: 189-191.
39. HUEBER, F. M. and J. LANGENHEIM. 1986. Dominican amber tree had african ancestors. Geotimes 31: 8-10.
40. KELCHNER, S. A. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482-498.
41. LAJIDE, L., P. ESCOUBAS, and J. MIZUTANI. 1995. Termite antifeedant activity in Detarium microcarpum. Phytochemistry 40: 1101-1104.
42. LANGENHEIM, J. H. 1981. Terpenoids in the Leguminosae. Pp. 627-656 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 2, eds. R. M. Polhill and P. H. Raven. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
43. _. 2003. Plant resins: chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Portland: Timber Press.
44. LEE, Y.-T. and J. H. LANGENHEIM. 1975. Systematics of the genus Hymenaea L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae). University of California Publications in Botany 69: 1-109.
45. LÉONARD, J. 1950. Étude botanique des copaliers du Congo belge. Publications de l'I.N.É.A.C. Série Scientifique 45: 1-158.
46. _. 1957. Genera des Cynometreae et des Amherstieae africaines (Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae). Essai de blastogénie appliquée à la systématique. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale de Belgique. Classe des Sciences 30: 1-314.
47. _. 1994. Contribution blastogénique à l'identité générique de l'espèce africaine Sindora klaineana Pierre ex Pellegr. (Caesalpiniaceae Detarieae). Bulletin du Jardin botanique National de Belgique 63: 233-240.
48. _. 1999. Colophospermum n'est pas synonyme d'Hardwickia (Caesalpiniaceae) Conclusion d'une méthode objective de travail. Bulletin du Jardin botanique National de Belgique 67: 21-43.
49. LIU, J.-S. and C. L. SCHARDL. 1994. A conserved sequence in internal transcribed spacer 1 of plant nuclear rRNA genes. Plant Molecular Biology 26: 775-778.
50. LOCKHART, P. J., M. A. STEEL, M. D. HENDY, and D. PENNY. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 605-612.
51. MACKINDER, B. 2005. Tribe Detarieae. Pp. 68-109 in Legumes of the World, eds. G. P. Lewis, B. D. Schrire, and B. MacKinder. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
52. MAI, J. C. and A. W. COLEMAN. 1997. The Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 exhibits a common secondary structure in green algae and flowering plants. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44: 258-271.
53. MAYOL, M. and J. A. ROSSELLÓ. 2001. Why nuclear ribosomal DNA spacers (ITS) tell different stories in Quercus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 167-176.
54. NIXON, K. C. and J. M. CARPENTER. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221-241.
55. NYLANDER, J. A. A. 2006. MrModeltest, version 2.2. Uppsala: Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University.
56. PHILLIPS, M. J. and D. PENNY. 2003. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 171-185.
57. POINAR, H. N., R. J. CANO, and G. O. J. POINAR. 1993. DNA from an extinct plant. Nature 363: 677.
58. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, S. G., E. A. KELLOGG, and B. BREMER. 2004. Recent origin and phylogenetic utility of divergent ITS putative pseudogenes: a case study from Naucleeae (Rubiaceae). Systematic Biology 53: 177-192.
59. REITER, E., E. TREADWELL, E. CEDERSTROM, P. B. REICHARDT, and T. P. CLAUSEN. 2003. Diterpenes from Colophospermum mopane: "missing links" in the biogenesis of 9,13-epoxylabdanes. Journal of Natural Products 66: 30-33.
60. RONQUIST, F. and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
61. SCHILLING, E. E., C. R. LINDER, R. D. NOYES, and L. H. RIESEBERG. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships in Helianthus (Asteraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequence data. Systematic Botany 23: 177-187.
62. SCHNABEL, A., P. E. MCDONEL, and J. F. WENDEL. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in Gleditsia (Leguminosae) based on ITS Sequences. American Journal of Botany 90: 310-320.
63. SIMMONS, M. P. and H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence - based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
64. STEEL, M. A., P. J. LOCKHART, and D. PENNY. 1993. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. Nature 364: 440-442.
65. SUN, Y., D. Z. SKINNER, G. H. LIANG, and S. H. HULBERT. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Sorghum and related taxa using internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 26-32.
66. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) version 4.0b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
67. SYMINGTON, C. F. 1944. Pseudosindora palustris. Proceedings of the Linnean Society 155: 285-288.
68. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, and J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
69. TUCKER, S. C. 2000. Organ loss in detarioid and other leguminous flowers, and the possibility of saltatory evolution. Pp. 107-120 in Advances in Legume Systematics Part 9, eds. P. S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
70. WATSON, L. and M. J. DALLWITZ. 1993 onwards. The genera of Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae and Swartzieae: description, identification, and information retrieval. http://delta-intkey.com/caes/en/index.htm
71. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, and J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds. M. Innis, D. Gelfaud, J. Sninsky, and T. White. New York: Academic Press.
72. YODER, A. D., J. A. IRWIN, and B. A. PAYSEUR. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.
73. YOUNG, N. D. and J. HEALY. 2003. Gapcoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 6.
74. ZUCKER, M. 2003. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 3406-3415.