Floral morphology in Caesalpinioid legumes: Testing the monophyly of the "Umtiza clade"

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 164, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Herendeen, Patrick S ^a   Lewis, Gwilym P ^a   Bruneau, Anne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Caesalpinioideae; Flower morphology; Leguminosae; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

FLORAL TRAIT; LEGUME; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

ACROCARPUS; ARCOA; CAESALPINIOIDEAE; CALYX; CERATONIA; CERCIDEAE; COROLLA; DETARIEAE; FABACEAE; GLEDITSIA; GYMNOCLADUS; MIMOSOIDEAE; PAPILIONOIDEAE; TETRAPTEROCARPON; UMTIZA;

EID: 0242575053     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/376881     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Banks H, BB Klitgaard 2000 Palynological contribution to the systematics of detarioid legumes (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Pages 79-106 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
2. Brouat C, L Gielly, D McKey 2001 Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Leonardoxa (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) inferred from chloroplast trnL intron and trnL-trnT intergenic spacer sequences. Am J Bot 88:43-149.
3. Bruneau A 1997 Evolution and homology of bird pollination systems in Erythrina (Leguminosae: Phaseoleae). Am J Bot 84:54-71.
4. Bruneau A, FJ Breteler, JJ Wieringa, GYF Gervais, F Forest 2000 Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Pages 121-149 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
5. Bruneau A, F Forest, PS Herendeen, BB Klitgaard, GP Lewis 2001 Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Syst Bot 26:487-514.
6. Chappill JA 1995 Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: the development of an explicit phylogenetic hypothesis. Pages 1-9 in MD Crisp, JJ Doyle, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
7. Cowan RS, RM Polhill 1981a Amherstieae. Pages 135-142 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
8. _ 1981b Detarieae. Pages 117-134 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
9. Dilcher DL 1974 Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Bot Rev 40:1-157.
10. DuPuy DJ, J-N Labat, R Rabevohitra, J-F Villiers, J Bosser, J Moat 2002 The Leguminosae of Madagascar. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
11. Farris JS, M Kallersjo, AG Kluge, C Bult 1995 Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst Biol 44:570-572.
12. Ferguson IK, H Banks 1995 Pollen morphology of the Cynometra group (Detarieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae) in Africa. Pages 217-227 in NM Dutta, S Gupta-Bhatticharya, M Bhattacharya, eds. Second symposium of African palynology, Tervuren (Belgium). Publ Occas CIFEG 1995/31, Orléans.
13. Fougère-Danezan M, S Maumont, A Bruneau 2003 Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. Pages 161-180 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
14. Gervais GYF, A Bruneau 2002 Phylogenetic analysis of a polyphyletic African genus of Caesalpinioideae (Fabaceae): Monopetalanthus Harms. Plant Syst Evol 235:19-34.
15. Goloboff P 1993 Nona computer program, version 2.0. Distributed by the author. Tucumán, Argentina.
16. Gordon D 1966 A revision of the genus Gleditsia (Leguminosae). PhD diss. Indiana University, Bloomington.
17. Herendeen PS 2000 Structural evolution in Caesalpinioideae. Pages 45-64 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
18. Herendeen PS, A Bruneau, GP Lewis 2003 Phylogenetic relationships in Caesalpinioid legumes: a preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data. Pages 37-62 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
19. Herendeen PS, DL Dilcher 1990 Reproductive and vegetative evidence for the occurrence of Crudia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) in the Eocene of southeastern North America. Bot Gaz 151:402-413.
20. Hickey LJ 1979 A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Pages 25-39 in CR Metcalfe, L Chalk, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 2d ed. Vol 1. Clarendon, Oxford.
21. Hillcoat D, G Lewis, B Verdcourt 1980 A new species of Ceratonia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) from Arabia and the Somali Republic. Kew Bull 35:261-271.
22. Irwin HS, RC Barneby 1981 Cassieae. Pages 97-106 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
23. Kajita T, H Ohashi, Y Tateishi, CD Bailey, JJ Doyle 2001 rbcL and legume phytogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Syst Bot 26:515-536.
24. Leaf Architecture Working Group 1999 Manual of leaf architecture: morphological description and categorization of dicotyledonous and net-veined monocotyledonous angiosperms. Privately printed. Washington, D.C.
25. Lee YT 1976 The genus Gymnocladus and its tropical affinity. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 57:91-112.
26. Léonard J 1957 Genera des Cynometreae et des Amherstieae africaines (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Mem Acad R BeIg Classe Sci 30:1-314.
27. Lewis GP, B Schrire 1995 A reappraisal of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae) using phylogenetic analysis. Pages 41-52 in MD Crisp, JJ Doyle, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
28. Mackinder BA 2000 The monophyly and taxonomic position of Berlinia Hook. f. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae): a preliminary study. Pages 151-163 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
29. Meikle RD 1977 Flora of Cyprus. Vol 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
30. Nixon KC 1999 WINCLADA. Distributed by the author. Ithaca, New York.
31. Polhill RM, PH Raven, CH Stirton 1981 Evolution and systematics of the Leguminosae. Pages 1-26 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
32. Polhill RM, JE Vidal 1981 Caesalpinieae. Pages 81-96 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
33. Schnabel A, PE McDonel, JF Wendel 2003 Phylogenetic relationships in Gleditsia (Leguminosae) based on ITS sequences. Am J Bot 90: 310-320.
34. Simmons MP, H Ochotenera 2000 Gaps as characters in sequencebased phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49:369-381.
35. Simpson BB, LL Larkin, A Weeks 2003 Progress toward resolving the relationships of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Pages 124-148 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
36. Simpson BB, B-M Miao 1997 The circumscription of Hoffmannseggia (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae, Caesalpinieae) and its allies using morphological and cpDNA restriction site data. Plant Syst Evol 205: 157-178.
37. Swofford DL 2000 PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
38. Taberlet P, L Gielly, G Pautou, J Bouvet 1991 Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17:1105-1109.
39. Tucker SC 1987 Floral initiation and development in legumes. Pages 183-239 in CH Stirton, ed. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
40. _ 1989 Evolutionary implications of floral ontogeny in legumes. Pages 59-75 in CH Stirton, JL Zarucchi, eds. Advances in legume biology. Monogr Syst Bot Mo Bot Gard 29:59-75.
41. _ 1991 Helical floral organogenesis in Gleditsia, a primitive caesalpinioid legume. Am J Bot 78:1130-1149.
42. _ 1992 The developmental basis for sexual expression in Ceratonia siliqua (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae). Am J Bot 79:318-327.
43. _ 2001 Floral development in Schotia and Cynometra (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). Am J Bot 88: 1164-1180.
44. Tucker SC, AW Douglas 1994 Ontogenetic evidence and phylogenetic relationships among basal taxa of legumes. Pages 11-32 in IK Ferguson, SC Tucker, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 6. Structural botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
45. Wieringa JJ 1999 Monopetalanthus exit: a systematic study of Aphanocalyx, Bikinia. Icuria, Michelsonia and Tetraberlinia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Wagening Agric Univ Pap 99-4:1-320.
46. Wieringa JJ, GYF Gervais 2003 Total evidence approach on the Aphanocalyx-Bikinia-Tetraberlinia group (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae s.l.). Pages 181-196 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
47. Wilkinson HP 1979 The plant surface. Pages 97-165 in CR Metcalfe, L Chalk, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 2d ed. Vol 1. Clarendon, Oxford.