Morphology and phylogenetic analysis of Paloue and related genera in the Brownea clade (Detarieae, Caesalpinioideae)

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 167, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1229-1246

  Redden, Karen M ^a   Herendeen, Patrick S ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Caesalpinioideae; Elizabetha; Heterostemon; Leguminosae; Morphology; Paloue; Paloveopsis; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CLADISTICS; FLORAL TRAIT; LEGUME; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; RELATEDNESS;

GUYANA SHIELD; SOUTH AMERICA; VENEZUELA;

BROWNEA; CAESALPINIOIDEAE; DETARIEAE; ELIZABETHA; FABACEAE; HETEROSTEMON; PALOUE;

EID: 33845631983     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/508065     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Banks H, BB Klitgaard 2000 Palynological contribution to the systematics of detarioid legumes. Pages 79-106 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
2. Banks H, BB Klitgaard, GP Lewis, PR Crane, A Bruenau 2003 Pollen and the systematics of tribes Caesalpinieae and Cassieae (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Pages 95-122 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
3. Breteler FJ 1995 The boundary between Amherstieae and Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae). Pages 53-61 in MD Crisp, JJ Doyle, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
4. Brouat C, L Gielly, D McKey 2001 Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Leonardoxa (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) inferred from chloroplast trnL intron and trnL-trnF intergenic spacer sequences. Am J Bot 88:143-149.
5. Bruneau A, FJ Breteler, JJ Wieringa, GYF Gervais, F Forest 2000 Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Pages 121-149 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
6. Bruneau A, F Forest, PS Herendeen, BB Klitgaard, GP Lewis 2001 Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Syst Bot 26:487-514.
7. Bruneau A, BB Klitgaard, M Fougere-Danezan, SC Tucker 2005 Phylogenetic analysis of floral ontogenetic and molecular characters in the Caesalpinioideae: insights into floral evolution in the basal Leguminosae. Paper presented at the 17th International Botanical Congress, Vienna, July 17-23.
8. Cowan RS 1957 Studies in tropical American Leguminosae. III. Brittonia 8:251-253.
9. - 1958 Studies in tropical American Leguminosae. IV. Brittonia 10:28-30.
10. - 1975 Brachycylix, a new genus of tropical Leguminosae (Caesalpinioideae). Proc K Ned Akad Wet Ser C 78:464-467.
11. - 1976a A taxonomic revision of Elizabetha (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) . II. Proc K Ned Akad Wet Ser C 79:335-346.
12. - 1976b A taxonomic revision of the genus Heterostemon (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Proc K Ned Akad Wet Ser C 79:42-60.
13. Cowan RS, RM Polhill 1981 Deterieae. Pages 117-134 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
14. Davis CC, PW Fritsch, J Li, MJ Donoghue 2002 Phylogeny and biogeography of Cercis (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast ndhF sequence data. Syst Bot 27:289-302.
15. Doyle JJ, JA Chappill, CD Bailey, T Kajita 2000 Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rbcL sequence and non-molecular data. Pages 1-20 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
16. Doyle JJ, MA Luckow 2003 The rest of the iceberg: legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiol 131:900-910.
17. Felstenstein J 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
18. Fougere-Danezan M, S Maumont, A Bruneau 2003 Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. Pages 161-180 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
19. Gervais GYF, A Bruneau 2002 Phylogenetic analysis of polyphyletic African genus of Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae): Monopetalanthus Harms. Plant Syst Evol 235:19-34.
20. Goloboff P 1993 NONA, version 2.0. http://www.cladistics.com.
21. Haston EM, GP Lewis, JA Hawkins 2005 A phylogenetic reappraisal of the Peltophorum group (Caesalpiniae: Leguminosae) based on the chloroplast trnL-F, rbcL and rps16 sequence data. Am J Bot 92:1359-1371.
22. Herendeen PS 2000 Structural evolution in Caesalpinioideae. Pages 45-64 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
23. Herendeen PS, A Bruneau, GP Lewis 2003a Phylogenetic relationships in Caesalpinioid legumes: a preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data. Pages 37-62 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
24. Herendeen PS, DL Dilcher 1990 Reproductive and vegetative evidence for the occurrence of Crudia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) in the Eocene of southeastern North America. Bot Gaz 151:402-413.
25. Herendeen PS, GP Lewis, A Bruneau 2003b Floral morphology in Caesalpinioid legumes: testing the monophyly of the "Umtiza clade." Int J Plant Sci 164(suppl):S393-S407.
26. Hillis DM, JJ Bull 1993 An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182-192.
27. Kass E, M Wink 1996 Molecular evolution of the Leguminosae: phylogeny of the three subfamilies based on rbcL-sequences. Biochem Syst Ecol 24:365-378.
28. Klitgaard BB 1991 Ecuadorian Brownea and Browneopsis (Leguminosae- Caesalpinioideae): taxonomy, palynology, and morphology. Nord J Bot 11:433-449.
29. Klitgaard BB, F Forest, A Bruneau, H Banks 2002 Duparquetia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): an enigmatic basal legume with zygomorphic flowers. Paper presented at the conference "Flowers: diversity, development and evolution," Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, July 5-7, 2002.
30. Lewis GP, B Schrire 1995 A reappraisal of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae): an enigmatic basal legume with orchid-like flowers. Pages 41-52 in MD Crisp, JJ Doyle, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
31. Lewis GP, B Schrire, B Mackinder, M Lock 2005 Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
32. Neill DA 1998 Ecuadendron (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae): a new arborescent genus from western Ecuador. Novon 8:45-49.
33. Nixon K 1999 The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15:407-414.
34. - 1999-2002 WinClada, version 1.00.08. Ithaca, NY. http://www.cladistics. com.
35. Rodrigues WA, HC de Lima 1989 Notas sobre os generos Paloue Aublet e Paloveopsis Cowan (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) no Brasil. Acta Amazonica 19:147-153.
36. Simpson BB 1999 A revision of Hoffmannseggia (Fabaceae) in North America. Lundellia 2:14-54.
37. Simpson BB, LL Larkin, A Weeks 2003 Progress toward resolving the relationships of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Pages 123-148 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
38. Simpson BB, JA Tate, A Weeks 2004 Phylogeny and character evolution of Hoffmannseggia (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Syst Bot 29:933-946.
39. Tucker SC 1992 The role of floral development studies in legume evolution. Can J Bot 70:692-700.
40. - 1997 Floral evolution, development, and convergence: the hierarchical-significance hypothesis. Int J Plant Sci 158(suppl): S143-S161.
41. - 2000a Evolutionary loss of sepals and/or petals in detarioid legume taxa Aphanocalyx, Brachystegia, and Monopetalanthus (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Am J Bot 87:608-624.
42. - 2000b Floral development and homeosis in Saraca (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). Int J Plant Sci 161:537-549.
43. - 2000c Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. Am J Bot 87:1385-1407.
44. - 2000d Organ loss in detarioid and other leguminous flowers and the possibility of salutatory evolution. Pages 107-120 in PS Herendeen, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
45. - 2002a Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). 1. Radially symmetrical taxa lacking organ suppression. Am J Bot 89:875-887.
46. - 2002b Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). 2. Zygomorphic taxa with petal and stamen suppression. Am J Bot 89:888-907.
47. Tucker SC, AW Douglas 1994 Ontogenetic evidence and phylogenetic relationships among basal taxa of legumes. Pages 11-32 in IK Ferguson, SC Tucker, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 6. Structural botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
48. Wieringa JJ 1999 Monopetalanthus exit: a systematic study of Aphanocalyxl, Bikinia, Icuria, Michelsonia and Tetraberlinia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Wageningen Agric Univ Pap 99:1-320.
49. Wieringa JJ, GYF Gervais 2003 Phylogenetic analyses of combined morphological and molecular data sets on the Aphanocalyx-Bikinia-Tetraberlina group (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae s.l.). Pages 181-196 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
50. Wojciechowski MF 2003 Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): an early 21st century perspective. Pages 5-35 in BB Klitgaard, A Bruneau, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 10. Higher level systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
51. Wojciechowski MF, M Lavin, MJ Sanderson 2004 A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am J Bot 91:1845-1861.