System identification of complex and structured systems

European Journal of Control

Volumn 15, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 275-310

  Hjalmarsson, Håkan ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Experiment design; Model accuracy; System identification

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL;

ESTIMATED MODEL; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; INPUT ENERGY; KEY ISSUES; MODELING ACCURACY; NOISE PROPERTIES; STRUCTURED SYSTEMS; SYSTEM INFORMATION; SYSTEM-IDENTIFICATION; SYSTEMS COMPLEXITY;

RELIGIOUS BUILDINGS;

EID: 77956454158     PISSN: 09473580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3166/EJC.15.275-310     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Ogunnaike BA. A contemporary industrial perspective on process control theory and practice. Annu Rev Control 1996; 20: 1-8
2. Hussain MA. Review of the applications of neural networks in chemical process control - simulation and on-line implementation. Artif Intell Eng 1999; 13(1): 55-68
3. Ljung L. Asymptotic variance expressions for identified black-box transfer function models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1985; 30(9): 834-844
4. Rojas CR, Welsh JS, Agü ero JC. Fundamental limitations on the variance of parametric models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2008, submitted
5. Rojas CR. Robust experiment design. PhD dissertation, The University of Newcastle, June 2008
6. Ninness B. The asymptotic CRLB for the spectrum of ARMA processes. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2003; 51(6): 1520-1531
7. nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1999
8. Gevers M, Ljung L. Optimal experiment designs with respect to the intended model application. Automatica 1986; 22(5): 543-554
9. Bombois X, Scorletti G, Van den Hof PMJ, Gevers M, Hildebrand R. Least costly identification experiment for control: A solution based on a high-model order approximation. In:American Control Conference, Boston, MA, 2004
10. Bombois X, Scorletti G, Gevers M, Van den Hof PMJ, Hildebrand R. Least costly identification experiment for control. Automatica 2006; 42(10): 1651-1662
11. Pronzato L. Adaptive optimization and D-optimum experimental design. Ann Stat 2000; 28(6): 1743-1761
12. Forssell U, Ljung L. Some results on optimal experiment design. Automatica 2000; 36(5): 749-756
13. Lindqvist K, Hjalmarsson H. Optimal input design using linear matrix inequalities. In: Proceedings of the 12th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, 2000
14. Lindqvist K, Hjalmarsson H. Identification for control: adaptive input design using convex optimization. In: Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE, Orlando, December 2001, pp. 4326-4331
15. Belforte G, Gay P. Optimal experiment design for regression polynomial models identification. Int J Control 2002; 75(15): 1178-1189
16. Bernaerts K, Servaes RD, Kooyman S, Versyck KJ, Impe JFV. Optimal temperature input design for estimation of the square root model parameters: parameter accuracy and model validity restrictions. Int J Food Microbiol 2002; 73(2-3): 145-157
17. Belforte G, Gay P. Optimal input design for setmembership identification of Hammerstein models. Int J Control 2003; 76(3): 217-225
18. Jauberthie C, Denis-Vidal L, Coton P, Joly-BlanchardG. An optimal input design procedure. Automatica 2006; 42(5): 881-884
19. Stigter JD, Vries D, Keesman KJ. On adaptive optimal input design: a bioreactor case study. AIChE J 2006; 52(9): 3290-3296
20. Mårtensson J, Hjalmarsson H. Robustness issues in experiment design for system identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2009, provisionally accepted
21. Rojas CR, Welsh JS, Goodwin GC, Feuer A. Robust optimal experiment design for system identification. Automatica 2007; 43(6): 993-1008
22. Swevers J, Schutter WVJD. Dynamic model identification for industrial robots: integrated experiment design and parameter estimation. IEEE Control Syst Mag 2007; 27(5): 58-71
23. Rojas CR, Agü ero JC, Welsh JS, Goodwin GC. On the equivalence of least costly and traditional experiment design for control. Automatica 2008; 44(11): 2706-2715
24. Rojas C, Hjalmarsson H, Gerencsér L, Mårtensson J. Consistent estimation of real NMP zeros in stable LTI systems of arbitrary complexity. In: 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint-Malo, France, July 2009, to appear
25. Franceschini G, Macchietto S. Model-based design of experiments for parameter precision: state of the art. Chem Eng Sci 2008; 63(19): 4846-4872
26. Pronzato L. Optimal experimental design and some related control problems. Automatica 2008; 44(2): 303-325
27. Barenthin M, Bombois X, Hjalmarsson H, Scorletti G. Identification for control of multivariable systems: controller validation and experiment design via LMIs. Automatica 2008; 44(12): 3070-3078
28. Bombois X, Hjalmarsson H. Optimal input design for robust H2 deconvolution filtering. In: 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint-Malo, France, July 2009, to appear
29. Barenthin M. Complexity issues, validation and input design for control in system identification. Doctoral thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 2008
30. Hildebrand R. Optimal inputs for FIR system identification. In: 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico, 2008, pp. 5525-5530
31. Lindqvist K. On experiment design in identification of smooth systems. Licentiate thesis, Department of Signals, Sensors and Systems, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, June 2001
32. Hildebrand R, Gevers M. Identification for control: optimal input design with respect to a worst-case -gap cost function. SIAM J Control Optim 2003; 41(5): 1586-1608
33. Jansson H. Experiment design with applications in identification for control. Doctoral thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004
34. Jansson H, Hjalmarsson H. Input design via LMIs admitting frequency-wise model specifications in confidence regions. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2005; 50(10): 1534-1549
35. Mårtensson J, Jansson H, Hjalmarsson H. Input design for identification of zeros. In: 16th World Congress on Automatic Control, IFAC, Prague, Czech Republik, 2005
36. Barenthin M, Jansson H, Hjalmarsson H. Applications of mixed H1 and H2 input design in identification. In: 16th World Congress on Automatic Control, IFAC, Prague, Czech Republik, 2005, paper Tu-A13-TO/1
37. Hildebrand R, Solari G. Identification for control: optimal input intended to identify a minimum variance controller. Automatica 2007; 43(5): 758-767
38. Barenthin M, Jansson H, Hjalmarsson H, Mårtensson J, Wahlberg B. A control perspective on optimal input design in system identification. In: Forever Ljung in System Identification. Studentlitteratur, Sept. 2006, ch. 10
39. Hjalmarsson H, Mårtensson J. Optimal input design for identification of non-linear systems: learning from the linear case. In: American Control Conference, New York City, USA, July 11-13, 2007
40. Barenthin M, Hjalmarsson H. Identication and control: joint input design and H1 state feedback with ellipsoidal parametric uncertainty via LMIs. Automatica 2008; 44(2): 543-551
41. Hjalmarsson H, Jansson H. Closed loop experiment design for linear time invariant dynamical systems via LMIs. Automatica 2008; 44(3): 623-636
42. Gerencsér L, Hjalmarsson H. Identification of ARX systems with non-stationary inputs - asymptotic analysis with application to adaptive input design. Automatica 2009; 45(3): 623-633
43. Gevers M. Identification for control: from the early achievements to the revival of experiment design. Eur J Control 2005; 4-5: 335-352, 2005, Semi-plenary lecture at IEEE Conference on Decision and Control - European Control Conference
44. Gevers M. A decade of progress in iterative process control design: from theory to practice. J Process Control 2002; 12: 519-531
45. Hjalmarsson H. From experiment design to closed loop control. Automatica 2005; 41(3): 393-438
46. Zhu Y. System identification for process control: recent progress and outlook. In: 14th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Newcastle, Australia, March 27-29, 2006, pp. 20-32, plenary address
47. Rivera DE, Morari M. Control-relevant model reduction problems for SISO H2, H1 and controller synthesis. Int J Control 1987; 46(2): 505-527
48. Schrama RJP. Accurate models for control design: the necessity of an iterative scheme. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1992; 37(7): 991-994
49. Zang Z, Bitmead RR, Gevers M. Iterative weighted leastsquares identification and weighted LQG control design. Automatica 1995; 31: 1577-1594
50. Campi MC, Lecchini A, Savaresi SM. Virtual reference feedback tuning: a direct method for the design of feedback controllers. Automatica 2002; 38(8): 1337-1346
51. Hjalmarsson H, Lindqvist K. Identification for control: L2 and L1 methods. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, Florida, USA, December 2001
52. Rojas C, Barenthin M, Hjalmarsson H. The cost of complexity in identification of FIR systems. In: 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, South Korea, 2008, pp. 11451-11456
53. Gevers M, Bazanella AS, Miskovic L. Informative data: how to get just sufficiently rich? In: 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico, 2008, pp. 1962-1967
54. Gevers M, Bazanella AS, Bombois X, Miskovic L. Identification and the information matrix: how to get just sufficiently rich? IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2009, to appear
55. Gevers M, Bazanella AS, Bombois X. Connecting informative experimetns, the information matrix and the minima of a prediction error identification criterion. In: 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint Malo, France, July 6-8, 2009
56. Stoica P, Marzetta TL. Parameter estimation problems with singular information matrices. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2001; 49(1), 87-90
57. Campi MC, Ooi SK, Weyer E. Guaranteed nonasymptotic confidence regions in system identification. Automatica 2005; 41(10): 1751-1764
58. Van den Hof PMJ, Douma S, den Dekker AJ, Bombois X. Probabilistic model uncertainty bounding in prediction error identification based on alternative test statistics. Automatica, 2009, submitted
59. den Dekker AJ, Bombois X, Van den Hof PMJ. Finite sample confidence regions for parameters in prediction error identification using output error models. In: Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 2008, pp. 5024-5029
60. Lin J-T. Approximating the cumulative chi-square distribution and its inverse. The Statistician 1988; 37(1): 3-5
61. Kullback S. Information Theory and Statistics. Wiley, New York, 1959
62. Ljung L, Hjalmarsson H. System identification through the eyes of model validation. In: Proceedings of European Control Conference, Rome, Italy, 1995, pp. 949-954
63. Gantmacher F. Matrix Theory. Chelsea Publishing Inc., New York, 1959
64. Hjalmarsson H, Gevers M, De Bruyne F. For model based control design criteria, closed loop identification gives better performance. Automatica 1996; 32: 1659-1673
65. Mårtensson J. Geometric analysis of stochastic model errors in system identification, Doctoral thesis, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 2007
66. Zehna PW. Invariance of maximum likelihood estimation. Ann Math Statist 1996; 37: 755
67. Grenander U, Szegö G. Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1958
68. Oppenheim A, Schafer R. Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989
69. Bombois X, Anderson BDO, Gevers M. Mapping parametric confidence ellipsoids to Nyquist plane for linearly parametrized transfer functions. In: Goodwin GC (ed), Model Identification and Adaptative Control, Springer Verlag, 2000, pp. 53-71
70. Vinnicombe G. Frequency domain uncertainty and the graph topology. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1993; 38: 371-1382
71. Bombois X, Gevers M, Scorletti G, Anderson BDO. Robustness analysis tools for an uncertainty set obtained by prediction error identification. Automatica 2001; 37: 1629-1636
72. Boyd S, El Ghaoui L, Feron E, Balakrishnan V. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1994
73. Fedorov VV. Theory of Optimal Experiments, ser. Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Academic Press, 1972, vol. 12
74. Goodwin GC, Payne RL. Dynamic System Identification: Experiment Design and Data Analysis. Academic Press, New York, 1977
75. Zarrop M. Optimal Experiment Design for Dynamic System Identification. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Sci. 21, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1979
76. Pukelsheim F. Optimal design of experiments. John Wiley: New York, 1993
77. Fedorov VV, Hackl P. Model-Oriented Design of Experiments. Lecture Notes in Statistics; 125. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1996
78. Walter E, Pronzato L. Qualitative and quantitative experiment design for phenomenological models - a survey. Automatica 1990; 26(2): 195-213
79. Yakubovich V. The solution of certain matrix inequalities in automatic control theory. Soviet Math Dokl 1962; 3: 620-623
80. Iwasaki T, Hara S. Generalized KYP lemma: unified frequency domain inequalities with design applications. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2005; 50(1): 41-59
81. Bombois X, Scorletti G, Anderson BDO, Gevers M, Van den Hof PMJ. A new robust control design procedure based on a PE identification uncertainty set. In: IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, 2002
82. Pronzato L, Walter E. Robust experiment design via stochastic approximation. Math Biosci 1985; 75(1): 103-120
83. Pronzato L, Walter E. Robust experiment design via maximin optimization. Math Biosci 1988; 89(2): 161-176
84. Gerencsér L, Hjalmarsson H. Adaptive input design in system identification. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, Seville, Spain, December 12-15, 2005, pp. 4988-4993
85. Skogestad S. Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J Process Control 2003; 13: 291-309
86. Wahlberg B, Hjalmarsson H, Mårtensson J. Variance results for identification of cascade systems. Automatica 2009, to appear
87. Mårtensson J, Hjalmarsson H. Variance analysis in SISO linear systems identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2009, submitted
88. Hjalmarsson H, Mårtensson J. A geometric approach to variance analysis in system identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2009, submitted
89. Mårtensson J, Hjalmarsson H. A geometric approach to variance analysis in system identification: linear timeinvariant systems. In: 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, USA, December 2007, pp. 4269-4274
90. Hjalmarsson H, Mårtensson J. A geometric approach to variance analysis in system identification: theory and nonlinear systems. In: 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, USA, December 2007, pp. 5092-5097
91. Mårtensson J, Hjalmarsson H. Variance error quantifications for identified poles and zeros. Automatica 2009, to appear
92. Gevers M, Miskovic L, Bonvin D, Karimi A. Identification of multi-input systems: variance analysis and input design issues. Automatica 2006; 42(4): 559-572
93. Xavier J, Barroso V. The Riemannian geometry of certain parameter estimation problems with singular Fisher information matrices. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2004
94. Zacks S. The Theory of Statistical Inference. Wiley, 1971