Closed loop experiment design for linear time invariant dynamical systems via LMIs

Automatica

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 623-636

  Hjalmarsson, HÅkan ^a   Jansson, Henrik ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Closed loop; Experiment design; Identification

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES;

FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS; YOULA-KUCERA PARAMETER;

CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS;

EID: 39449112539     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agüero, J. C., & Goodwin, G. C. (2007). Choosing between open and closed loop experiments in linear system identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52 (8), 1475-1480.
2. Anderson B.D.O., and Moore J.B. Optimal filtering (1979), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
3. Bombois X., Scorletti G., Gevers M., Van den Hof P.M.J., and Hildebrand R. Least costly identification experiment for control. Automatica 42 10 (2006) 1651-1662
4. Bombois, X., Scorletti, G., & Van den Hof, P. M. J. (2005). Least disturbing closed-loop identification experiment for control. In Proceedings of the 16th IFAC world congress.
5. Boyd S., and Vandenberghe L. Convex optimization (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
6. Carathéodory C. Über den variabilitätsbereich der koeffizienten von potenzreihen, die gegebene werte nicht annehmen. Mathematische Annalen 64 (1907) 95-115
7. Forssell U., and Ljung L. Some results on optimal experiment design. Automatica 36 5 (2000) 749-756
8. Gevers M., and Ljung L. Optimal experiment designs with respect to the intended model application. Automatica 22 5 (1986) 543-554
9. Gohberg I., Kraashoek M., and Woerdeman H. The bandmethod for positive and contractive extension problems. Integral Equations and Oper. for Theory 22 (1989) 109-155
10. Goodwin, G. C. & Payne, R.L. (1977). Dynamic system identification: Experiment design and data analysis, Vol. 136. Mathematics in science and engineering, New York: Academic Press.
11. Gustavsson I., Ljung L., and Söderström T. Identification of processes in closed loop-Identifiability and accuracy aspects. Automatica 13 1 (1977) 59-75
12. Hildebrand R., and Gevers M. Identification for control: Optimal input design with respect to a worst case ν-gap cost function. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 41 5 (2003) 1586-1608
13. Hildebrand R., and Solari G. Identification for control: Optimal input intended to identify a minimum variance controller. Automatica 43 5 (2007) 758-767
14. Hjalmarsson H. From experiment design to closed loop control. Automatica 41 3 (2005) 393-438
15. Hjalmarsson H., Gevers M., and De Bruyne F. For model-based control design, closed loop identification gives better performance. Automatica 32 12 (1996) 1659-1673
16. Hjalmarsson H., MÅrtensson J., and Wahlberg B. On some robustness issues in input design. In 14th IFAC symposium on system identification (2006), Newcastle, Australia
17. Iwasaki T., and Hara S. Generalized KYP lemma: Unified frequency domain inequalities with design applications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 50 1 (2005) 41-59
18. Jansson H., and Hjalmarsson H. Input design via LMIs admitting frequency-wise model specifications in confidence regions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-50 10 (2005) 1534-1549
19. Kalman R.E. Lyapunov functions for the problem of Lur'e in automatic control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 49 (1963) 201-205
20. Kucera, V. (1975). Stability of discrete linear feedback systems. In Proceedings of the IFAC world congress, Vol. 1. Boston, MA. Paper 44.1.
21. Lee W.S., Anderson B.D.O., Kosut R.L., and Mareels I.M.Y. A new approach to adaptive robust control. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 7 (1993) 183-211
22. Lindqvist, K. (2001). On experiment design in identification of smooth systems. Licentiate thesis, Department of Signals, Sensors and Systems, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
23. Lindqvist, K., & Hjalmarsson, H., (2000). Optimal input design using linear matrix inequalities. In Proceedings of the 12th IFAC symposium on system identification, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
24. Lindqvist, K., & Hjalmarsson, H. (2001). Identification for control: Adaptive input design using convex optimization. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE conference on decision and control. IEEE Orlando, FL, USA.
25. Ljung L. Asymptotic variance expressions for identified black-box transfer function models. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-30 9 (1985) 834-844
26. Ljung L. System identification-Theory for the user. (2nd ed.) (1999), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
27. MÅrtensson, J., & Hjalmarsson, H. (2006). Robust input design using sum of squares constraints. In 14th IFAC symposium on system identification, Newcastle, Australia.
28. Mehra R.K. Optimal input signals for parameter estimation in dynamic systems-Survey and new results. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 6 (1974) 753-768
29. Nesterov, Yu., & Nemirovski, A. (1994). Interior-point polynomial methods in convex programming, Vol. 13, Studies in applied mathematics, SIAM. Philadelphia.
30. Ng T.S., Goodwin G.C., and Payne R.L. On maximal accuracy estimation with output power constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-22 1 (1977) 133-134
31. Ng T.S., Goodwin G.C., and Söderström T. Optimal experiment design for linear systems with input-output constraints. Automatica 13 6 (1977) 571-577
32. Ninness B., and Hjalmarsson H. Variance error, reproducing kernels and orhonormal bases. In: Heuberger P., Van den Hof P.M.J., and Wahlberg B. (Eds). Modelling and identification with rational orthogonal functions. (2005), Springer, Berlin
33. Rojas C.R., Welsh J.S., Goodwin G.C., and Feuer A. Robust optimal experiment design for system identification. Automatica 43 6 (2007) 993-1008
34. Stoica P., and Söderström T. A useful parameterization for optimal experiment design. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-27 4 (1982) 986-989
35. Sturm J.F. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software 11 (1999) 625-653
36. Walter E., and Pronzato L. Qualitative and quantitative experiment design for phenomenological models-A survey. Automatica 26 2 (1990) 195-213
37. Yakubovich V.A. The solution of certain matrix inequalities in automatic control theory. Soviet Mathematics Doklady 3 (1962) 620-623
38. Youla D.C., Jabr H.A., and Bongiorno J.J. Modern Wiener-Hopf design of optimal controllers-Part II: Multivariable case. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 21 6 (1976) 319-338
39. Zang Z., Bitmead R.R., and Gevers M. Iterative weighted least-squares identification and weighted LQG control design. Automatica 31 11 (1995) 1577-1594
40. Zarrop, M. (1979). Design for dynamic system identification. Lecture notes in control and information sciences, Vol. 21, Berlin: Springer.
41. Zhou K., Doyle J.C., and Glover K. Robust and optimal control (1996), Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliff, NJ