Identification for control: Optimal input design with respect to a worst-case ν-gap cost function

SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1586-1608

  Hildebrand, Roland ^a   Gevers, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Identification for control; Parametric uncertainty region; Worst case gap

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ERROR DETECTION; PROBABILITY; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SYSTEM STABILITY;

OPTIMAL INPUT DESIGN;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 0141757426     PISSN: 03630129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/S0363012901399866     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. ABADIE, ED., Nonlinear Programming, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967, chap. 7.
2. X. BOMBOIS, B. ANDERSON, AND M. GEVERS, Frequency domain image of a set of linearly parametrized transfer functions, in Proceedings of the 6th European Control Conference, 2001, pp. 1416-1421.
3. X. BOMBOIS, M. GEVERS, AND G. SCORLETTI, A measure of robust stability for a set of parametrized transfer functions, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 45 (2000), pp. 2141-2145.
4. X. BOMBOIS, M. GEVERS, G. SCORLETTI, AND B. ANDERSON, Robustness analysis tools for an uncertainty set obtained by prediction error identification, Automatica, 37 (2001), pp. 1629-1636.
5. S. BOYD, L. EL GHAOUI, E. FERON, AND V. BALAKRISHNAN, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM Stud. Appl. Math. 15, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.
6. B. L. COOLEY, J. H. LEE, AND S. P. BOYD, Control-relevant experiment design: A plant-friendly, LMI-based approach, in Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference, Vol. 2, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1998, pp. 1240-1244.
7. P. DATE AND G. VINNICOMBE, An algorithm for identification in the ν-gap metric, in Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference of Decision and Control, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1999, pp. 3230-3235.
8. K. FAN, On a theorem of Weyl concerning eigenvalues of linear transformations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 35 (1949), pp. 652-655.
9. V. FEDOROV, Theory of Optimal Experiments, Probab. Math. Statist. 12, Academic Press, New York-London, 1972.
10. M. GEVERS, X. BOMBOIS, B. CODRONS, G. SCORLETTI, AND B. ANDERSON, Model validation for control and controller validation in a prediction error framework, in System Identification 2000 (SYSID 2000), Vol. 1, 2000, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 319-324.
11. G. GOODWIN AND R. PAYNE, Design and characterization of optimal test signals for linear SISO parameter estimation, in Preprints of 3rd IFAC Symposium, The Hague, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, paper TT-1.
12. G. GOODWIN, M. ZARROP, AND R. PAYNE, Coupled design of test signal, sampling intervals and filters for system identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 19 (1974), pp. 748-752.
13. S. KARLIN AND L. SHAPLEY, Geometry of Moment Spaces, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 12, AMS, Providence, RI, 1953.
14. S. KARLIN AND W. STUDDEN, Tchebycheff Systems: With Applications in Analysis and Statistics, Pure Appl. Math. 15, Interscience, New York, 1966.
15. J. KIEFER, General equivalence theory for optimum designs (approximate theory), Ann. Statist., 2 (1974), pp. 849-879.
16. J. KIEFER AND J. WOLFOWITZ, Optimum designs in regression problems, Ann. Math. Statist., 30 (1959), pp. 271-294.
17. M. KREIN, The ideas of P.L. Čebyšev and A.A. Markov in the theory of limiting values of integrals and their further developments, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 12 (1951), pp. 1-122.
18. K. LINDQVIST AND H. HJALMARSSON, Identification for control: Adaptive input design using convex optimization, in Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, FL, 2001, pp. 4326-4331.
19. L. LJUNG, System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall Information and System Sciences Series, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
20. R. MEHRA, Optimal input signals for parameter estimation in dynamic systems - survey and new results, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 19 (1974), pp. 753-768.
21. R. MEHRA, Optimal inputs for linear system identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 19 (1974), pp. 192-200.
22. Y. NESTEROV AND A. NEMIROVSKII, Interior Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming, SIAM Stud. Appl. Math. 13, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.
23. R. PAYNE, Optimal Experiment Design for Dynamic System Identification, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London, 1974.
24. R. PAYNE AND G. GOODWIN, Simplification of Frequency Domain Experiment Design for SISO Systems, Publication 74/3, Dept. of Computing and Control, Imperial College, London, 1974.
25. J. SCHOUKENS, P. GUILLAUME, AND R. PINTELON, Perturbation signals for system identification, in Prentice Hall International Series in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993, ch. 3, pp. 126-160.
26. A. VAN DEN BOS, Selection of periodic test signals for estimation of linear system dynamics, in Preprints of 3rd IFAC Symposium, The Hague, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, paper TT-3.
27. E. VAN DEN EIJNDE AND J. SCHOUKENS, On the design of optimal excitation signals, in Proceedings of the 9th IFAC/IFORS Symposium on Identification and System Parameter Estimation, Budapest, Hungary, 1991, pp. 827-832.
28. G. VINNICOMBE, Frequency domain uncertainty and the graph topology, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 38 (1993), pp. 1371-1383.
29. S. Wu, S. P. BOYD, AND L. VANDENBERGHE, FIR filter design via semidefinite programming and spectral factorization, in Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, 1996.
30. M. ZARROP, Optimal Experiment Design for Dynamic System Identification, Lecture Notes in Control and Inform. Sci. 21, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1979.