Optimal experiment design for regression polynomial models identification

International Journal of Control

Volumn 75, Issue 15, 2002, Pages 1178-1189

  Belforte, Gustavo ^a   Paolo, G A Y ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0037109818     PISSN: 00207179     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207170210159131     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Al-Duwaish, H., and Nazmul Karim M., 1997, A new method for the identification of Hammerstein model. Automatica, 33, 1871-1875.
2. Belforte, G., Bona, B., Canuto, E., Donati, F., Ferraris, F., Gorini, I., Morei, S., Peisino, M., and Sartori, S., 1987 b, Coordinate measuring machines and machine tools self-calibration and error correction. Annals of CIRP, 36/1, 359-364.
3. Belforte, G., Bona, B., and Frediani, S., 1984, Optimal sampling schedule with unknown but bounded measurement errors: families of linear models. Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision Control, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 1554-1559.
4. Belforte, G., Bona, B., and Frediani, S., 1987 a, Optimal sampling schedule for parameter estimation of linear models with unknown but bounded measurement errors. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 32, 179-182.
5. Belforte, G., and Gay, P., 1999, Optial input design for Hammerstein (FIR) model identification with unknown but bounded errors. Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, USA, December, pp. 590-591.
6. Belforte, G., and Gay, P., 2000, Optimal worst case estimatin for LPV-FIR models with bounded errors. Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, December, pp. 4573-4577.
7. Belforte, G., Gay, P., and Monegato, G., 2000, Some new properties of Chebyshev polynomials. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 117, 175-181.
8. ∞. Systems and Control Letters, 20, 273-278.
9. Fedorov, V.V., 1972, Theory of Optimal Experiments (New York: Academic Press).
10. Goodwin, G.C., and Payne, R., L., 1977, Dynamic Systems Identification: Experiment Design and Data Analysis (New York: Academic Press).
11. Haber, R., and Unbehauen, H., 1990, Structure identification of nonlinear dynamic systems-a survey of input/output approaches. Automatica, 26, 651-677.
12. Lang, Z.Q., 1997, A nonparametric polynomial identification algorithm for the Hammerstein systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42, 1435-1441.
13. Micchelli, C.A., 1988, Optimal sampling design for parameter estimation and p-width under stochastic and deterministic noise. In M. Milanese et al. (eds) Robustness in Identification and Control (New York: Plenum Press), pp. 25-40.
14. Pázman, A., 1986, Foundations of Optimum Experimental Design (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).
15. Pearson, R.K., 1995, Nonlinear input/output modelling. Journal of Process Control, 5, 197-211.
16. Sartori, S., and Zhang, G.X., 1995, Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines. Annals of CIRP, 44/2, 599-609.
17. Szegö, G., 1975, Orthogonal Polynomials (New York: American Mathematical Society, Colloquium Publications).