Least costly identification experiment for control

Automatica

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1651-1662

  Bombois, X ^a   Scorletti, G ^b   Gevers, M ^c   Van den Hof, P M J ^a   Hildebrand, R ^d  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^c CESAME   (Belgium)

^d Équipe VAlidation Spécification et COnstruction de logiciels   (France)

Author keywords

Experiment design; Identification for control

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

CONTROL-ORIENTED MODEL; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION FOR CONTROL;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 33747810074     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2006.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bombois X., Gevers M., Scorletti G., and Anderson B.D.O. Robustness analysis tools for an uncertainty set obtained by prediction error identification. Automatica 37 10 (2001) 1629-1636
2. Bombois, X., & Gilson, M. (2006). Cheapest identification experiment with guaranteed accuracy in the presence of undermodeling. In 14th IFAC symposium on system identification (pp. 505-510). Newcastle.
3. Bombois X., Scorletti G., Gevers M., Hildebrand R., and Van den Hof P.M.J. Cheapest open-loop identification for control. CD-ROM Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE conference on decision and control (2004), The Bahamas 382-387
4. Bombois, X., Scorletti, G., Van den Hof, P. M. J., & Gevers, G. (2004). Least costly identification experiment for control: A solution based on a high-order model approximation. In CD-ROM Proceedings of the American control conference. Boston, MA, USA.
5. Boyd, S., El Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., & Balakrishnan, V. (1994). Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1994.
6. Cooley B., and Lee J. Control-relevant experiment design for multivariable systems described by expansions in othonormal bases. Automatica 37 2 (2001) 273-281
7. ∞ control for a flexible transmission system. CD-ROM Proceedings of the European control conference (1997), Brussels, Belgium
8. Forssell U., and Ljung L. Some results on optimal experiment design. Automatica 36 (2000) 749-756
9. Gevers M., and Ljung L. Optimal experiment designs with respect to the intended model application. Automatica 22 (1986) 543-554
10. Hildebrand R., and Gevers M. Identification for control: Optimal input design with respect to a worst-case ν-gap cost function. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 41 5 (2003) 1586-1608
11. Hjalmarsson H., Gevers M., and De Bruyne F. For model based control design, closed-loop identification gives better performance. Automatica 32 (1996) 1659-1673
12. Jansson, H. (2004). Experiment design with applications in identification for control. Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
13. 2 input design for identification. CD-ROM Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE conference on decision and control (2004), The Bahamas 388-393
14. Landau I.D., Rey D., Karimi A., Voda A., and Franco A. A flexible transmission system as a benchmark for robust digital control. European Journal of Control 1 2 (1995) 77-96
15. Lindqvist, K. (2001). On experiment design in identification of smooth linear systems. Licenciate thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. Ljung L. System identification: Theory for the user. (2nd ed.) (1999), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
17. Meinsma G., Shrivastava Y., and Fu M. A dual formulation of mixed μ and on the losslessness of (D, G) scaling. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 42 7 (1997) 1032-1036
18. Popov V.M. Hyperstability of control systems (1973), Springer, New York
19. Rivera D.E., Lee H., Braun M.W., and Mittelmann H.D. Plant-friendly system identification: A challenge for the process industries. Proceedings of the 13th IFAC symposium on system identification (2003), Rotterdam 917-922
20. Söderström T., and Stoica P. System identification (1989), Prentice-Hall International, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire
21. Tempo R., Bai E.W., and Dabbene F. Probabilistic robustness analysis: Explicit bound for the minimum number of samples. Systems and Control Letters 30 (1997) 237-242
22. Tempo R., Calafiore G., and Dabbene F. Randomized algorithms for analysis and control of uncertain systems (2004), Springer, New York
23. Van den Eijnde E., and Schoukens J. On the design of optimal excitation signals. Proceedings of the ninth IFAC/IFORS symposium on identification and system parameter estimation (1991), Budapest, Hungary 827-832