Users' data: Collaborative and social analysis

Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 175-193

  Harrer, Andreas ^a   Martínez Monés, Alejandra ^b   Dimitracopoulou, Angelique ^c  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

Author keywords

Data formats; Interaction analysis; Network visualisations; Tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956375962     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Avouris, N., Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2003). On analysis of collaborative problem solving: An object-oriented approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 147-167.
2. Avouris, N., Margaritis, M., & Komis, V. (2004). Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem-solving activities: The Synergo approach. Paper presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction, ITS2004, 7th Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceio: Brasil.
3. Bratitsis, T., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2006). Monitoring and analyzing group interactions in asynchronous discussions with the DIAS system. In Y. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs & E. Gomez-Sanchez (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use: Proceedings the of the CRIWG 2006 workshop (pp. 54-61). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
4. Bratitsis, T., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Interpretation issues in monitoring and analyzing group interactions in asynchronous discussions. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 4, 20-40.
5. Card, K. S., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in infonnation visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
6. Denzin, N. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Dimitracopoulou, A., et al. (2004). State of the ait on interaction analysis: Interaction analysis indicators. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from www.noe-kaleidoscope.org: http://telearn. noe-kaleidoscope.org/ open-archive/file?Dimitrakopoulou-Kaleidoscope-2004.pdf
8. Dimitracopoulou, A., et al. (2005). State of the ait of interaction analysis for metacognitive support and diagnosis. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from http://telearn. noekaleidoscope.org/open-archive/ file?Dimitrakopoulou-Kaleidoscope-2006.pdf
9. Ga Bner K., Jansen, M., Harrer, A, Herrmann, K., & Hoppe, H. U. (2003). Analysis methods for collaborative models and activities. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 411-420). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Goldman, R. (2004). Digital video design ethnography as a vehicle for change: A perspectivity meme spreads in a class of "wild and crazy teens". Cambridge Journal of Education, 34, 157-178.
11. Granger, S., Kraif, O., Ponton, C., Antoniadis, G., & Zampa, V. (2007). Integrating learner corpora and natural language processing: A crucial step towards reconciling technological sophistication and pedagogical effectiveness. ReCALL, 19, 252-268.
12. Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger.
13. Harrer, A., Hever, R., & Ziebarth, S. (2007). Empowering researchers to detect interaction patterns in e-collaboration. In R. Lucldn, K. R. Koedinger & J. Greer (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Building technology rich learning contexts that work (pp. 503-510). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
14. Harrer, A., Zeini, S., & Pinkwart, N. (2006). Evaluation of communication in web-supported learning communities: An analysis with triangulation research design. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 2, 428-446.
15. Harrer, A., Vetter, M., Thür, S., & Brauckmann, J. (2005). Discovery of patterns in learner actions. In: C.-K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Supporting learning through intelligent and socially infonned technology (pp. 816-818). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
16. Harrer, A., Zeini, S., Ziebarth, S., & Mtinter, D. (2007). Visualisation of the dynamics of computermediated community networks. Paper presented at International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, Corfu, Greece.
17. Harrer, A., Kahrimanis, G., Zeini, S., Bollen, L., & Avouris, N. (2006). Is there a way to e-Bologna? Cross-national collaborative activities in university courses. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 140-154). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
18. Jermann, P. (2004). Computer support for interaction regulation in collaborative problem-solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universite de Geneve, Switzerland.
19. Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K, & Reimann, P. (2006). The big five and visualisations of team work activity. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley & T. Chan (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 197-206). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
20. Krempel, L (2005). Visualisierung komplexer Strukturen: Grundlagen der Darstellung mehrdimensionaler Netzwerke [Visualizing complex structures: Foundations for creating multidimensional networks]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
21. Martinez, A., De La Fuente, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2003). Towards an XML-based representation of collaborative interaction. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 379-388). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
22. Martinez, A., Harrer, A., Barros, B., & Velez, J. (2005). Library of interaction analysis methods. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from http://www.noe-kaleidoscope.org
23. Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Rubia-Avi, B., Jorrín-Abellan, I., & Marcos, J. A. (2006). Studying participation networks in collaboration using mixed methods in three case studies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 383-408.
24. Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computersupported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 63-86.
25. Moreno, J. L. (1951). Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society. New York: Beacon House.
26. De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Palonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2000). Patterns of interaction in computer-supported learning: A social network analysis. In B. Fishman & S. O'Conner-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Learning Sciences (pp. 334-339). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance learning. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 343-352). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
29. Soller, A., Martínez Monés, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review on the state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 261-290.
30. Sun. L., & Vassileva, J. (2006). Social visualization encouraging participation in online communities. In Y. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs & E. Gomez-Sanchez (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use: Proceedings the of the CRIWG 2006 workshop (pp. 349-363). Berlin. Germany: Springer.
31. Wassermann, S., & Faust. K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and application. Cambridge. MA: Cambridge University Press.