Discourse analysis: The practice and practical value of taping, transcribing, and analyzing talk

Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 153-177

  Tracy, Karen ^a   Mirivel, Julien C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956358514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203871645-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (175)

1. Agne, R. R. (2003). Negotiation discourse: The FBI and David Koresh at Waco. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
2. Agne, R. R., & Tracy, K. (2001). “Bible babble”: Naming the interactional trouble at Waco. Discourse Studies, 3, 269-294.
3. Alvesson, M. (2004). Organizational culture and discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 317-335). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Anderson, D. L. (2004). The textualizing functions of writing for organizational change. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18, 141-164.
5. Ashcraft, K. L. (2005). Resistance through consent? Occupational identity, organizational form, and the maintenance of masculinity among commercial airline pilots. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 67-90.
6. Atkinson, P., & Heath, C. (Eds.). (1981). Medical work: Realities and routines. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
7. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1999). Jefferson’s transcript notation. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 158-166). New York: Routledge.
8. Baker, C. D., Emmison, M., & Firth, A. (Eds.). (2005). Calling for help: Language and social interaction in telephone helplines. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Bales, R. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257-263.
10. Barge, J. K., & Loges, W. E. (2003). Parent, student, and teacher perceptions of parental involvement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 140-163.
11. Bavelas, J. B., Coats, L., & Johnson, T. (2002). Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52, 566-580.
12. Baxter, L. A., Hirokowa, R., Lowe, J. B., Nathan, P., & Pearce, L. (2004). Dialogic voices in talk about drinking and pregnancy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 224-248.
13. Beach, W. A. (2001). Stability and ambiguity: Managing uncertain moments when updating news about mom’s cancer. Text, 21, 221-250.
14. Beach, W. A. (2002). Between dad and son: Initiating, delivering, and assimilating bad cancer news. Health Communication, 14, 271-298.
15. Beck, C. S., Benitez, J. L., Edwards, A., Olson, A., Pai, A., & Torres, M. B. (2004). Enacting “health communication”: The field of health communication as constructed through publication in scholarly journals. Health Communication, 16, 475-492.
16. Billig, M. (1999a). Conversation analysis and the claims of naiveté. Discourse & Society, 10, 572-576.
17. Billig, M. (1999b). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10, 543-558.
18. Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
20. Braithwaite, D. O., & Eckstein, N. J. (2003). How people with disabilities communicatively manage assistance: Helping as instrumental social support. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 1-26.
21. Buttny, R. (2004). Talking problems: Studies of discursive construction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22. Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Candlin, C. N., & Candlin, S. (2002). Discourse, expertise, and the management of risk in health care settings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 115-137.
24. Carbaugh, D. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in American scenes. Albany: State University of NewYork Press.
25. Castor, T. R. (2004). Constructing social reality in organizational decision making: Account vocabularies in a diversity discussion. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 479-508.
26. Cheney, G., Christensen, L. T., Conrad, C., & Lair, D. J. (2004). Corporate rhetoric as organizational discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 79-103). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Cissna, K., N. (Ed.). (1995). Applied communication in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Clark, C., Drew, P., & Pinch, T. (1994). Managing customer “objections” during real-life sales negotiation. Discourse & Society, 5, 437-462.
29. Clayman, S. E. (1995). Defining moments, presidential debates, and the dynamics of quotability. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 118-146.
30. Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749-775.
31. Condor, S. (2000). Pride and prejudice: Identity management in English people’s talk about “this country.” Discourse & Society, 11, 175-205.
32. Conley, J. M., & O’Barr, W. M. (1998). Just words: Law, language, and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Conquergood, D. (1995). Between rigor and relevance: Rethinking applied communication. In K. N. Cissna (Ed.), Applied communication in the 21st century (pp. 79-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Cooren, F. (2003). The communicative achievement of collective minding: Analysis of board meeting excerpts. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 517-557.
35. Cooren, F. (Ed.). (2006). Interacting and organizing: Analysis of a management meeting. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Craig, R. T. (1989). Communication as a practical discipline. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues (pp. 97-122). Newbury Park CA: Sage.
37. Craig, R. T. (1995). Applied communication research in a practical discipline. In K. N. Cissna (Ed.), Applied communication in the 21st century (pp. 147-156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Craig, R. T., & Sanusi, E. (1999). “I’m just saying”: Discourse markers of standpoint continuity. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 103-108). Amsterdam: SicSat.
39. Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248-272.
40. Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (2005). “The issue” in argumentation practice and theory. In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 11-28). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
41. Drew, P., & Chilton, K. (2000). Calling just to keep in touch: Regular and habitualised telephone calls as an environment for small talk. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 137-162). New York: Longman.
42. Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Duff Wrobbel, E. (2003). The interactional construction of self-revelation: Creating an “aha” moment. In P. J. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 353-362). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Eadie, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). The agenda for applied communication research [Special issue]. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19(1-2).
46. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Edwards, J. A., & Lampert, M. D. (Eds.). (1993). Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.
49. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.
50. Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Fairhurst, G. T., & Cooren, F. (2004). Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conversation analysis, and speech act schematics. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 131-152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14, 5-26.
53. Fisher, S., & Todd, A. D. (Eds.). (1983). The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
54. Fitch, K. L. (1998). Text and context: A problematic distinction for ethnography. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 91-107.
55. Fitch, K. L. (1999). Pillow talk? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 41-50.
56. Fitch, K. L., & Sanders, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
58. Frey, L. R. (Ed.). (1998). Communication and social justice research [Special issue]. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(2).
59. Gabriel, Y. (1998). Same old story or changing stories? Folklore, modern, and postmodern mutations. In D. Grant, T. Keenoy, & C. Oswick (Eds.), Discourse and organization (pp. 84-103). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
61. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
62. Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. L. (2004). Introduction: Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Greespan, S., & Shoultz, B. (1981). Why mentally retarded adults lose their jobs: Social competence as a factor in work adjustment. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2, 23-38.
64. Harter, L. (2004). Masculinity(s), the agrarian frontier myth, and cooperative ways of organizing: Contradictions and tensions in the experience and enactment of democracy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 89-118.
65. Haspel, K., & Tracy, K. (2007). Marking and shifting lines in the sand: Discursive moves of ordinary democracy. In K. Tracy, J. P. McDaniel, & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), The prettier doll: Rhetoric, discourse, and ordinary democracy (pp. 142-175). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
66. Hauser, G. A. (1998). Vernacular dialogue and the rhetoricality of public opinion. Communication Monographs, 65, 83-107.
67. Hauser, G. A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
68. Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Heritage, J., & Lindström, A. (1998). Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 397-438.
70. Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359-417). New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855-1878.
72. Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power, and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2, 159-185.
73. Holmes, J. (2003). Small talk at work: Potential problems for workers with an intellectual disability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 65-84.
74. Holmes, J., Marra, M., & Burns, L. (2001) Women’s humour in the workplace: A quantitative analysis. Australian Journal of Communication, 28, 83-108.
75. Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Longman.
76. Holmes, J., Stubbe, M., & Vine, B. (1999). Constructing professional identity: “Doing power” in policy units. In C. Sarangi & C. Roberts (Eds.), Talk, work, and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings (pp. 351-385). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
77. Hsieh, E. (2004). Stories in action and the dialogic management of identities: Storytelling in transplant support group meetings. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 39-70.
78. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices, and applications. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
79. Jones, D., & Stubbe, M. (2004). Communication and the reflective practitioner: A shared perspective from sociolinguistics and organisational communication. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 185-211.
80. Katriel, T. (2004). Dialogic moments: From soul talks to talk radio in Israeli culture. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
81. Keyton, J. (2000). Applied communication research should be practical. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 166-169.
82. Komter, M. (2003). The interactional dynamics of eliciting a confession in a Dutch police interrogation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 433-470.
83. Koschmann, T., & LeBaron, C. D. (2002). Learner articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 249-282.
84. LeBaron, C. D., & Jones, S. E. (2002). Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 542-565.
85. LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (1997). Built space and the interactional framing of experience during a murder interrogation. Human Studies, 20, 1-25.
86. Mangione-Smith, R., Stivers, T., Elliott, M. N., McDonald, L., & Heritage, J. (2003). Online commentary during the physical examination: A communication tool for avoiding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing? Social Science & Medicine, 56, 313-320.
87. Mansbridge, J. J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. New York: Basic Books.
88. March, J. G. (1991). Organizational consultants and organizational research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 20-31.
89. Martin, D. M. (2004). Humor in middle management: Women negotiating the paradoxes of organizational life. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 147-170.
90. Mattson, M., & Roberts, F. (2001). Overcoming truth telling as an obstacle to initiating safer sex: Clients and health practitioners planning deception during HIV test counseling. Health Communication, 13, 343-362.
91. Maynard, D. W. (1991). Bearing bad news in clinical settings. In B. Dervin (Ed.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 143-172). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
92. Maynard, D. W. (1992). On clinicians co-implicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 331-358). New York: Cambridge University Press.
93. Maynard, D. W. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 93-130.
94. Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Milburn, T., Kenefick, J. V., & Lambert, A. (2006). Facilitating communication during a board of directors’ retreat: Enacting change at a family center. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups: Vol. 2. Facilitating group task and team communication (pp. 63-88). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
96. Miller, G. R. (1995). “I think my schizophrenia is better today,” said the communication researcher unanimously: Some thoughts on the dysfunctional dichotomy between pure and applied communication research. In K. N. Cissna (Ed.), Applied communication in the 21st century (pp. 47-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Mirivel, J. C. (2006). Getting “nipped and tucked” through talk: A communication take on cosmetic surgery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
98. Mirivel, J. C. (2007). Managing poor surgical candidacy: Communication problems for plastic surgeons. Discourse & Society, 1, 309-336.
99. Mirivel, J. C. (2008). The physical examination in cosmetic surgery: Communication strategies to promote the desirability of surgery. Health Communication, 23, 153-170.
100. Mirivel, J. C., & Tracy, K. (2005). Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 1-34.
101. Morgan, S. E., & Miller, J. K. (2002). Beyond the organ donor card: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and values on willingness to communicate about organ donation to family members. Health Communication, 14, 121-134.
102. Morris, G. H., & Chenail, R. J. (1995). The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
103. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
104. O’Hair, D. (Ed.). (2000). Defining applied communication scholarship [Special forum]. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(2), 164-191.
105. Philipsen, G., & Coutu, L. M. (2005). The ethnography of speaking. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 355-380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
106. Pittam, J., & Gallois, C. (2000). Malevolence, stigma, and social distance: Maximizing intergroup differences in HIV/AIDS discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 24-43.
107. Platt, F. W. (1995). Conversation repair: Case studies in doctor-patient communication. Boston: Little, Brown.
108. Plax, T. G. (1991). Understanding applied communication inquiry: Researcher as organizational consultant. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 55-70.
109. Pomerantz, A. M. (2003). Modeling as a teaching strategy in clinical training: When does it work? In. P. J. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 381-392). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
110. Pomerantz, A., Fehr, B. J., & Ende, J. (1997). When supervising physicians see patients: Strategies used in difficult situations. Human Communication Research, 23, 589-615.
111. Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
112. Putnam, L. L., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2001). Discourse analysis in organizations: Issues and concerns. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 78-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Roberts, F., & Robinson, J. D. (2004). Interobserver agreement on first-stage conversation analytic transcription. Human Communication Research, 30, 376-410.
114. Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25, 97-123.
115. Robinson, J. D. (2003). An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation. Health Communication, 15, 27-57.
116. Robinson, J. D., & Nussbaum, J. F. (2004). Grounding research and medical education about religion in actual physician-patient interaction: Church attendance, social support, and older adults. Health Communication, 16, 63-85.
117. Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. (1975). Relational communication analysis: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222-239.
118. Sachweh, S. (1998). Granny darling’s nappies: Secondary babytalk in German nursing homes for the aged. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 52-65.
119. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2, G. Jefferson, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
120. Sarangi, C., & Roberts, C. (Ed.). (1999). Talk, work, and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
121. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165-187.
122. Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue-Reply to Wetherell. Discourse & Society, 9, 413-416.
123. Schegloff, E. A. (1999a). “Schegloff’s texts” as “Billig’s data”: A critical reply. Discourse & Society, 10, 558-572.
124. Schegloff, E. A. (1999b). Naivete vs. sophistication or discipline vs. self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse & Society, 10, 577-582.
125. Scheuer, J. (2001). Recontextualization and communicative styles in job interviews. Discourse Studies, 3, 223-248.
126. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
127. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
128. Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Martin Kessler Books.
129. Seibold, D. R. (1995). Theoria and praxis: Means and ends in applied communication research. In K. N. Cissna (Ed.), Applied communication in the 21st century (pp. 23-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
130. Seibold, D. R. (2000). Applied communication scholarship: Less a matter of boundaries than of emphases. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 183-188.
131. Silverman, D. (1997). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
132. Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
133. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
134. Speer, S. A. (2002). “Natural” and “contrived” data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4, 511-525.
135. Stafford, L. (2009). Editorial policy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(1), n.p.
136. Stivers, T. (2002). Presenting the problem in pediatric encounters: “Symptoms only” versus “candidate diagnosis” presentations. Health Communication, 14, 299-338.
137. Stivers, T. (2005a). Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: Delivery formats and implications for parent resistance. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 949-964.
138. Stivers, T. (2005b). Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: One resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision. Health Communication, 18, 41-74.
139. Stivers, T., Mangione-Smith, R., Elliott, M. N., McDonald, L., & Heritage, J. (2003). Why do physicians think parents expect antibiotics? What parents report vs. what physicians believe. Journal of Family Practice, 52, 140-148.
140. Streeck, J., & Mehus, S. (2005). Microethnography: The study of practices. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 381-404). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
141. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
142. Tapsell, L. (2000). Using applied conversation analysis to teach novice dietitians history taking skills. Human Studies, 23, 281-307.
143. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
144. ten Have, P. (2002). Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speers’s “natural” and “contrived” data: A sustainable distinction. Discourse Studies, 4, 527-530.
145. Tracy, K. (1995). Action-implicative discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 195-215.
146. Tracy, K. (1997). Colloquium: Dilemmas of academic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
147. Tracy, K. (1998). Analyzing context: Framing the discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 1-28.
148. Tracy, K. (1999). The usefulness of platitudes in arguments about conduct. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 799-803). Amsterdam: SicSat.
149. Tracy, K. (2001). Discourse analysis in communication. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 725-749). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
150. Tracy, K. (2005). Reconstructing communicative practices: Action-implicative discourse analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 301-319). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
151. Tracy, K. (2007a). The discourse of crisis in public meetings: Case study of a school board’s multimillion dollar error. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 418-441.
152. Tracy, K. (2007b). Introduction: A moment of ordinary democracy. In K. Tracy, J. P. McDaniel, & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), The prettier doll: Rhetoric, discourse, and ordinary democracy (pp. 3-21). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
153. Tracy, K., & Agne, R. R. (2002). “I just need to ask somebody some questions”: Sensitivities in domestic dispute calls. In J. Cottrell (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 75-89). New York: Palgrave.
154. Tracy, K., & Anderson, D. L. (1999). Relational positioning strategies in calls to the police: A dilemma. Discourse Studies, 1, 201-226.
155. Tracy, K., & Ashcraft, C. (2001). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 297-316.
156. Tracy, K., & Craig, R. T. (2005, November). Invoking democracy: A powerful discourse strategy in public meetings. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Boston, MA.
157. Tracy, K., & Haspel, K. (2004). Language and social interaction: Its institutional identity, intellectual landscape, and discipline-shifting agenda. Journal of Communication, 54, 788-816.
158. Tracy, K., McDaniel, J. P., & Gronbeck, B. E. (Eds.). (2007). The prettier doll: Rhetoric, discourse, and ordinary democracy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
159. Tracy, K., & Muller, H. (2001). Diagnosing a school board’s interactional trouble: Theorizing problem formulating. Communication Theory, 11, 84-104.
160. Tracy, K., & Naughton, J. M. (2000). Institutional identity-work: A better lens. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 62-83). New York: Longman.
161. Tracy, K., & Standerfer, C. (2003). Selecting a school superintendent: Sensitivities in group deliberation. In L. R Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 109-134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
162. Tracy, K., & Tracy, S. J. (1998). Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing face and face-attack. Human Communication Research, 25, 225-251.
163. Tracy, S. J. (2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind: Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 119-146.
164. Tracy, S. J., & Tracy, K. (1998). Emotion labor at 911: A case study and theoretical critique. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 390-411.
165. van Dijk, T. A. (1985). (Ed.). Handbook of discourse analysis (4 vols.). London: Academic Press.
166. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997a). Discourse as social interaction: A multidisciplinary introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
167. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997b). Discourse as structure and process: A multidisciplinary introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
168. Weltman, D. (2003). The pragmatics of peremptory assertion: An ideological analysis of the use of the word “just” in local politicians’ denials of politics. Discourse & Society, 14, 349-373.
169. West, C. (1984). Routine complications: Troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
170. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387-412.
171. Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
172. Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2005). Working a call: Multiparty management of calls for help. In C. D. Baker, M. Emmison, & A. Firth (Eds.), Calling for help: Language and social interaction in telephone helplines (pp. 309-345). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
173. Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
174. Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual discourse. Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble Books.
175. Zoller, H. M. (2003). Health on the line: Identity and disciplinary control in employee occupational health and safety discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 118-139.