Vernacular dialogue and the rhetoricality of public opinion

Communication Monographs

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 83-107

  Hauser, Gerard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Public opinion; Rhetorical Dialogue; Vernacular Rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040681827     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637759809376439     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Arendt, H. (1977). Between past and future. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
3. Aristotle. (1941). Nichomachean ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.
4. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination; (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6. Bateson, G. (1972). Ecology of the mind. New York: Balantine.
7. Benhabib, S. (1992). Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition, and Jürgen Habermas. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 73-98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bitzer, L.F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
9. Bitzer, L.F. (1978). Rhetoric and public knowledge. In D.M. Burks (Ed.), Rhetoric, philosophy and literature: An exploration (pp. 67-95). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
10. Boas, G. (1969). Vox populi: Essays in the history of an idea. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1979). Public opinion does not exist. In A. Mattelart & S. Siegelaub (Eds.), Communication and class struggle (pp. 124-30). New York: Bagnolet.
12. Brummet, B. (1976). Some implications of "process" or, "intersubjectivity": Postmodern rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 9, 21-51.
13. Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Cherwitz, R.A. (Ed.). (1990). Rhetoric and philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cherwitz, R.A., & Hikens, J.W. (1986). Communication and knowledge: An investigation in rhetorical epistemology. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
17. Cohen, J.L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Dewey, J. (1954). The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow Press.
19. Dodd, L. (1994). Political learning and political change: Understanding development across time. In L.C. Dodd & C. Jillson (Eds.), The dynamics of American politics (pp. 331-364). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20. Dryzek, J.S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Elshtain, J.B. (1995). Democracy on trial. New York: Basic Books.
22. Farrell, T.B. (1976). Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 1-14.
23. Farrell, T.B. (1993). Norms of rhetorical culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. Fishkin, J.S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Ginsberg, B. (1986). The captive public: How mass opinion promotes state power. New York: Basic Books.
27. Graham, G.J., Jr., & Havard, W.C. (1984). The language of the statesman: Philosophy and rhetoric in contemporary politics. In J.M. Porter (Ed.), Sophia and praxis: The boundaries of politics (pp. 73-92). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
28. Gregg, R.B. (1984). Symbolic inducement and knowing: A study in the foundations of rhetoric. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
29. Grimaldi, W.M.A. (1980). Aristotle, Rhetoric I: A commentary. New York: Fordham University Press.
30. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. T. Burger, (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Hall, J.A. (Ed.) (1995). Civil society: Theory, history, comparison. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
32. Hauser, G.A. (1985). Common sense in the public sphere: A rhetorical grounding for publics. Informatologia Yugoslavia, 17, 67-75.
33. Hauser, G.A., & Blair, C. (1982). Rhetorical antecedents to the public. Pre/Text, 3, 139-167.
34. Hauser, G.A., & Cushman, D.P. (1973). McKeon's philosophy of communication: The architectonic and interdisciplinary arts. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 211-234.
35. Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered voices: How opinion polling has shaped American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Kennedy, G. (1991). Introduction. Aristotle, On Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Key, V.O. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Knopf.
38. Lasch, C. (1995). The revolt of the elites. New York: W.W. Norton.
39. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelsen, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
40. Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press.
41. Lowell, A.L. (1913). Public opinion and popular government. New York: Longmans Green.
42. McGee, M.C. (1975). In search of "the people": A rhetorical alternative. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 235-249.
43. McGee, M.C., & Martin, M.A. (1983). Public knowledge and ideological argumentation. Communication Monographs, 50, 47-65.
44. McKeon, R. (1957). Communication, truth and society. Ethics, 67, 89-99.
45. McKeon, R. (1969). Demonstration, verification, justification. Louvain: Nauwelaerts.
46. McKeon, R. (1971). The uses of rhetoric in a technological age: Architectonic productive arts. In L.F. Bitzer & E. Black (Eds.), The prospect of rhetoric (pp. 44-63). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47. McKeon, R. (1973). General Introduction. Introduction to Aristotle (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Mills, C.W. (1957). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Mills, C.W. (1963). Power, politics, and people (I. Horowitz, Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Nisbet, R. (1975). Public opinion versus popular opinion. Public Interest, 41, 166-192.
51. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1989). Advances in spiral of silence research. KEIO Communication Review, 10, 3-49.
52. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion-our social skin (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Nussbaum, M. (1986). The fragility of goodness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
54. Olson, E. (1976). On value judgments in the arts, and other essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Popkin, S. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Ryan, M. (1992). Gender and public access: Women's politics in nineteenth-century America. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 259-288). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Sagen, E. (1991). The honey and the hemlock. New York: Basic Books.
58. Seligman, A. (1992). The idea of civil society. New York: The Free Press.
59. Sennett, R. (1978). The fall of public man. New York: Vintage Books.
60. Scott, R.L. (1967). On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal, 18, 9-17.
61. Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25, 3-51.
62. Taylor, C. (1991). Language and society. In A. Honnuth & H. Joas (Eds.), Communicative action: Essays on Habermas's The theory of communicative action (pp. 23-35). Cambridge: MIT Press.
63. Taylor, D.G. (1986). Public opinion and collective action: The Boston school desegregation conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. von Wright, G.H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
65. Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.