The discourse of crisis in public meetings: Case study of a school district's multimillion dollar error

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 418-441

  Tracy, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Action implicative discourse analysis; Democracy; Local fovernance; Organizational crisis; Public meetings; School board

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148899483     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: 14795752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880701617133     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alder, G. S. (1997). Managing environmental uncertainly with legitimate authority: A comparative analysis of the Mann Gulch and Storm King fires. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 98-114.
2. Allen, M. W., & Caillouet, R. H. (1994). Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis. Communication Monographs, 61, 44-62.
3. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4. Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Briffault, R. (2005). The local school district in American law. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 24-55). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bryan, F. M. (2004). Real democracy: The New England town meeting and how it works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Chmelynski, C. (2003). In some communities, fewer people are willing to run for the school board. Retrieved October 1, 2003, from http://www.nsba.org/site/doc.sbn.asp
9. Coombs, W. T. (1999). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing and responding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Craig, R. T. (1989). Communication as a practical discipline. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, E. Wartella, & B. J. O'Keefe (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Volume 1. Paradigm issues (pp. 97-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248-272.
12. Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. (2000). Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 375-406.
13. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
14. Dionisopoulos, G. N., & Vibbert, S. L. (1988). CBS vs. Mobil Oil: Charges of creative bookkeeping in 1979. In H. R. Ryan (Ed.), Rhetorical encounters: Selected studies and sources of twentieth-century political accusations and apologies (pp. 243-251). New York: Greenwood Press.
15. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 470-520). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
17. Fairhurst, G. T, & Cooren, F. (2004). Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conversation analysis and speech act schematics. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 131-152). London: Sage.
18. Frates, C., & McQueen, M. M. (2002, December 15). St Vrain crisis built over years: Budget flaws eluded layers of oversight. The Denver Post, p. A-01.
19. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Harper Colophon Books.
20. Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.) (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
22. Habermas, J. (2001). On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies on the theory of communicative action (B. Fultner, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
23. Hearit, K. M., & Coutright, J. L. (2004). A symbolic approach to crisis management: Sears' defense of its auto repair policy. In D. P. Millar & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 201-212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Hess, F. M. (2002). School boards at the dawn of the 21st century: Conditions and challenges of district governance. Washington, DC: National School Board Association.
25. Hicks, D. (2002). The promise(s) of deliberative democracy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 5, 223-260.
26. Howell, W. G. (2005). Introduction. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 1-23). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
27. Karpowitz, C. F., & Mansbridge, J. (2005). Disagreement and consensus: The need for dynamic updating in public deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation, 1, 1-17.
28. Leslie, G., & Daugherty, R. (Eds.) (2001). Tapping officials' secrets (4th ed.). Arlington, VA: The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
29. Mansbridge, J. J. (1973). Time, emotion, and inequality: Three problems of participatory groups. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9, 351-368.
30. McComas, K. A. (2003). Citizen satisfaction with public meetings used for risk communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 164-184.
31. McQueen, M. M. (2002a, November 21). School budget crisis worsens in St. Vrain Valley. The Denver Post, p. B-01.
32. McQueen, M. M. (2002b, December 9). Residents may fight St. Vrain bond issue: Voters Ok'd sale before crisis came to light. The Denver Post, p. B-01.
33. Millar, D. P. (2004). Exposing the errors: An examination of the nature of organizational crisis. In D. P. Millar & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 19-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Millar, D. P., & Heath, R. L. (Eds.). (2004). Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 287-306.
36. Ogrizek, M., & Guillery, J. M. (1999). Communicating in crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
37. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
38. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making(2nd ed., pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone.
40. Roberts, F., & Robinson, J. D. (2004). Inter-observer agreement on "first-stage" conversation analytic transcription. Human Communication Research, 30, 376-410.
41. Rowland, R. C., & Jerome, A. (2004). On organizational apologia: A reconceptualization. Communication Theory, 14, 191-211.
42. Ryan, H. R. (1982). Kategoria and apologia: On their rhetorical criticism as a speech set. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68, 254-261.
43. Ryfe, D. M. (2002). The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication, 19, 359-377.
44. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
45. Schwartzman, H. B. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Plenum Press.
46. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. (2003). Communication and organizational crisis. Westport, CT: Praeger.
49. Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. (2002). A post-crisis discourse of renewal: The case of Maiden Mills and Cole Hardwoods. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 126-142.
50. Sellnow, T. L., & Brand, J. D. (2001). Establishing the structure of reality for an industry: Model and anti-model arguments as advocacy in Nike's crisis communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 278-295.
51. Sellnow, T. L., Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. R. (2002). Chaos theory, informational needs, and natural disasters. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 269-292.
52. Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Tracy, K. (1991). Introduction. In K. Tracy (Ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction: Multiple goals in discourse (pp. 1-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Tracy, K. (1995). Action-implicative discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 195-215.
55. Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford.
56. Tracy, K. (2005). Reconstructing communicative practices: Action-implicative discourse analysis. In K. Fitch & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 301-319). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57. Tracy, K., & Ashcraft, C. (2001 ). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 297-316.
58. Tracy, K., & Dimock, A. (2004). Meetings: Discursive sites for building and fragmenting community. In P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook 28 (pp. 127-164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Tracy, K., & Durfy, M. (2007). Speaking out in public: Citizen participation in contentious school board meetings. Discourse and Communication, 1, 223-249.
60. Tracy, K., & Mirivel, J. (in press). Discourse analysis: The practice and practical value of taping, transcribing, and analyzing. In L. Frey & K. Cissna (Eds.), Handbook of applied communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Tracy, K., & Muller, H. (2001). Diagnosing a school board's interactional trouble: Theorizing problem formulating. Communication Theory, 11, 84-104.
62. Tracy, K., & Standerfer, C. (2003). Selecting a school superintendent: Sensitivities in group deliberation. In L. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 109-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Ware, B. L., & Linkugel, W. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 273-283.
64. Williams, D. E., & Olaniran, B. A. (2002). Crisis communication in racial issues. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 293-313.
65. Zeigler, L. H., Jennings, M. K., & Peak, G. W. (1974). Governing American schools: Political interaction in local school districts. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
66. Zimmerman, J. F. (1999). The New England town meeting: Democracy in action. Westport, CT: Praeger.