‘Bible babble’: Naming the interactional trouble at waco

Discourse Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 269-294

  Agne, R R ^a   Tracy, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Bible talk; Branch Davidians; crisis negotiation; discourse; identity work; interactional framing; problem naming; Waco

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993699101     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445601003003002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ammerman, N.T. (1995) ‘Waco, Federal Law Enforcement, and Scholars of Religion’, in S.A. Wright (ed.) Armageddon in Waco, pp. 282-296. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Antaki, C. and Wetherell, M. (1999) ‘Show Concessions’, Discourse Studies 1(1): 7-27.
3. Arnold, P.J. (1994) ‘The Davidian Dilemma: To Obey God or Man?.’, in J.R. Lewis (ed.) From the Ashes: Making Sense of Waco, pp. 23-31. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
4. Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Burke, K. (1966) Language as Symbolic Action: Berkley: University of California Press.
7. Clayton, W.E. (1995) ‘Witness: Feds at Odds During Davidian Siege’, The Houston Chronicle, 2 November: A8.
8. Craig, R.T. (1989) ‘Communication as a Practical Discipline’, in B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O'Keefe and E. Wartella (eds) Rethinking Communication, Volume 1: Paradigm Issues, pp. 97-124. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Craig, R.T. (1992) ‘Practical Communication Theory and the Pragma-Dialectical Approach in Conversation’, in F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Brair and C.A. Willard (eds) Argumentation Illuminated, pp. 51-61. Amsterdam: Sic. Sat.
10. Craig, R.T. (1995) ‘The Normativity of Practical Theory: Two Approaches’, in F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Brair and C.A. Willard (eds) Perspectives and Approaches, pp. 173-182. Amsterdam: Sic. Sat.
11. Craig, R.T. and Tracy, K. (1995) ‘Grounded Practical Theory: The Case of Intellectual Discussion’, Communication Theory 5: 248-272.
12. Dewey, J. (1989) John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953, Volume 8: 1993, ed. J.A. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
13. Donohue, W.A., Ramesh, C., Kaufmann, G. and Smith, R. (1991) ‘Crisis Bargaining in Intense Conflict Situations’, International Journal of Group Tensions 21: 133-153.
14. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
15. Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 258-284. London: Sage.
16. Flinn, F.K. (1995) ‘Lessons Not Learned from Waco’, The San Francisco Examiner, 25 August: A23.
17. Ganey, T. and Freivogel, W.H. (2000) ‘FBI Photograph Apparently Undermines Claims that Government Forces Fired on Branch Davidians’, St Louis Post Dispatch, 11 January: A1, A3.
18. Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
19. Hammer, M.R. (2001) ‘Conflict Negotiation Under Crisis Condition’, in W.F. Eadie and P.E. Nelson (eds) The Language of Conflict and Resolution, pp. 57-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Hammer, M.R. and Rogan, R.G (1997). ‘Negotiation Models in Crisis Situations: The Value of a Communication Based Approach’, in R.G. Rogan, M.R. Hammer and C.R. Van Zandt (eds) Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory Research and Practice, pp. 10-23. Westport, CT: Praeger.
21. Hewitt, J.P. and Stokes, R. (1975) ‘Disclaimers’, American Sociological Review 40: 1-11.
22. Lancely, F.J. (1999) On Scene Guide for Crisis Negotiators. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
23. Macmillan, K. and Edwards, D. (1998) ‘ “Designer Families”: A Discourse Study of Fact and Accountability’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 2: 323-345.
24. Macmillan, K., and Edwards, D. (1999) ‘Who Killed the Princess?. Description and Blame in the British Press’, Discourse Studies 1: 151-174.
25. Mehan, H. (1979) Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Ochs, E. (1993) ‘Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 287-306.
27. Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric, and Social Construction. London: Sage.
28. Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Reavis, D.J. (1995) The Ashes of Waco: An Investigation. New York: Simon & Schuster.
30. Rogan, R.G. and Hammer, M.R. (1994) ‘Crisis Negotiations: A Preliminary Investigation of Facework in Naturalistic Conflict Discourse’, Journal of Applied Communication Research 22: 216-231.
31. Rogan, R.G., Hammer, M.R. and van Zandt, C.R. (1997) ‘Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: An Overview’, in R.G. Rogan, M.R. Hammer and C.R. van Zandt (eds) Dynamic Processes of Crisis Negotiation: Theory Research and Practice, pp. 1-8. Westport, CT: Praeger.
32. Scofield, C.I. (1945) The Scofield Reference Bible: The Holy Bible: Authorized King James Version. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Seper, J. (1993) ‘FBI's Ignorance of Religion Said to Abet Waco Tragedy’, The Washington Times, 16 October: A3.
34. Tabor, J.D. (1995) ‘Religious Discourse and Failed Negotiations: The Dynamics of Biblical Apocalypticism at Waco’, in S.A. Wright (ed.) Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidian Conflict, pp. 263-281. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Tabor, J.D. and Gallagher, E.V. (1995) Why Waco?. Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Thibodeau, D. and Whiteson, L. (1999) A Place Called Waco: A Survivor's Story. New York: Public Affairs.
37. Tracy, K. (1995) ‘Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14: 195-215.
38. Tracy, K. (1997) Colloquium: Dilemmas of Academic Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
39. Tracy, K. and Anderson, D.L. (1999) ‘Relational Positioning Strategies in Police Calls: A Dilemma’, Discourse Studies 1: 201-225.
40. Tracy, K and Muller, H.L. (2001) ‘Diagnosing a School Board's Interactional Trouble: Theorizing Problem Formulation’, Communication Theory 11: 84-104.
41. Tracy, K. and Naughton, J.M. (2000) ‘Institutional Identity-Work: A Better Lens’, in J. Coupland (ed.) Small Talk, pp. 62-83. Harlow: Longman.
42. Tracy, K. and Tracy, S. (1998) ‘Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack’, Human Communication Research 25: 225-251.
43. US Department of Justice (1993a) Evaluation of the Handling of the Branch Davidian Stand-Off in Waco, Texas. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
44. US Department of Justice (1993b) Lessons of Waco: Proposed Changes in Federal Law Enforcement. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
45. US Department of Justice (1993c) Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
46. US Department of Justice (1993d) Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas: February 28 to April 19, 1993. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
47. US Department of the Treasury (1993) Report of the Department of the Treasury on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Investigation of Vernon Wayne Howell Also Known as David Koresh. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
48. Van Dijk, T. (1993) ‘Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis’, Discourse in Society 4: 249-283.
49. Van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. (1993) Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
50. Whorf, B. (1956) Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Wright, S.A. (ed.) (1995) Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidian Conflict. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.