Effect of different steeping conditions on endosperm modification and quality of distilling malt

Journal of the Institute of Brewing

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 125-133

  Bryce, J H ^a   Goodfellow, V ^a   Agu, R C ^b   Brosnan, J M ^b   Bringhurst, T A ^b   Jack, F R ^b  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Scotch Whisky Research Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barley; Malt; Modification; Predicted spirit yield; Steeping condition

Indexed keywords

EFFLUENT TREATMENT; EFFLUENTS; ENZYMES; HYDRATION; NITROGEN; PROTEOLYSIS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; VISCOSITY; WATER; WATER TREATMENT;

BARLEY; MALT; MODIFICATION; PREDICTED SPIRIT YIELD; STEEPING CONDITION;

GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT);

HORDEUM;

EID: 77956296610     PISSN: 00469750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2010.tb00408.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agu, R. C., Quality assessment and performance of malted barley for food processing. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 2005, 42, 199-203.
2. Agu, R. C., Fermentation studies of wort made using malt and different adjuncts - rice and maltose syrup. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 2006, 43, 315-318.
3. Agu, R. C., Corn size distribution, cold water extract, and diastatic power in relation to malted barley. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 2009, Doi: 10.1094/TQ-46.1-0225-01
4. Agu, R. C. and Palmer, G. H., Enzymic breakdown of endosperm proteins of sorghum at different malting temperatures. J. Inst. Brew., 1996, 102, 415-418.
5. Agu, R. C. and Palmer, G. H., α-Glucosidase activity of sorghum and barley malts. J. Inst. Brew., 1997, 103, 25-29.
6. Agu, R. C. and Palmer, G. H., Some relationships between the protein nitrogen of barley and the production of amylolytic enzymes during malting. J. Inst. Brew., 1998, 104, 273-276.
7. Agu, R. C. and Palmer, G. H., The effect of nitrogen level on the performance of malting barley varieties during germination. J. Inst. Brew., 2001, 107, 93-98.
8. Agu, R. C. and Palmer, G. H., Pattern of nitrogen distribution in barley grains grown in the field. J. Inst. Brew., 2003, 109, 110-113.
9. Agu, R. C., Brosnan, J. M., Bringhurst, T. A., Palmer, G. H., and Jack, F. R., Influence of corn size distribution on the diastatic power of malted barley and its impact on other malt quality parameters. J. Agri. Food Chem., 2007, 55, 3702-3707.
10. Agu, R. C., Bringhurst, T. A. and Brosnan, J. M., Performance of husked, acid dehusked and hull-less barley and malt in relation to ethanol production. J. Inst. Brew., 2008, 114, 62-68.
11. Agu, R. C., Bringhurst, T. A. and Brosnan, J. M. and Pearson, S. Potential of hull-less barley malt for use in malt and grain whisky production. J. Inst. Brew., 2009, 115, 128-133.
12. Bamforth, C. W., β-Glucan and β-glucanases in malting and brewing: Practical aspects. Brew. Dig, 1994, 69(5), 12-16, 21.
13. Bathgate, G. N. and Palmer, G. H., The in vivo and in vitro degradation of barley and malt starch granules. J. Inst. Brew., 1973, 79, 402-406.
14. Bathgate, G. N., Palmer, G. H. and Wilson, G., The action of endo-β-glucanases on barley and malt β-glucans. J. Inst. Brew., 1974, 80, 278-285.
15. Baxter, E. D., Purification and properties of malt carboxypeptidases attacking hordein. J. Inst. Brew., 1978, 84, 271-275.
16. Baxter, E. D. and O'Farrell, D. D., Effect of raised temperatures during steeping and germination on proteolysis during malting. J. Inst. Brew., 1980, 86, 291-295.
17. Baxter, E. D., Reese, S. G. and Bamforth, C. W., The effect of increased steeping temperatures on enzyme development in malt. J. Inst. Brew., 1980, 86, 182-185.
18. Bendelow, V. M., Determination of non-starch carbohydrates in barley breeding programs. J. Inst. Brew., 1975, 81, 127-130.
19. Bishop, L. R., The composition and quantitative estimation of barley proteins. J. Inst. Brew., 1928, 34, 101-118.
20. Boeira, L. S., Bryce, J. H., Stewart, G. G., and Flannigan, B., The effect of a combination of Fusarium mycotoxins (Deoxynivalenol, Zearalenone and Fumonisin B1) on growth of brewing yeast. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2000, 88, 288-403.
21. Bourne, D. T., Jones, M. and Pierce, J. S., Beta glucan and β- glucanases in malting and brewing. Tech Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 1976, 13, 3-7.
22. Briggs, D. E., Hough, J. S., Stevens, R. and Young, T. W., Malting and Brewing Science. Vol. 1, Chapman and Hall, London, 1981, pp. 281-289.
23. Buckee, G. K., Malt analyses calculations and conversion factor. J. Inst. Brew., 1985, 91, 267-268.
24. Chapon, L., Erber, H. L., Kretchmer, K. F. and Kretchmer, H., The friabilimeter in service for quality and economy for malting and brewing. Montsschr. Brauwiss., 1980, 33, 1-11.
25. Cooper, D. J., Stewart, G. G. and Bryce, J. H., Yeast proteolytic activity during high and low gravity wort fermentations and its effect on head retention. J. Inst. Brew., 2000, 96, 197-201.
26. Darlington, H. E. and Palmer, G. H., Homogeneity of the friable flour of malting barley. J. Inst. Brew., 1996, 102, 179-182.
27. Darlington, H. E., Palmer, G. H., Bryce, J. H. and Stark, J. R., New concept of protein modification during malting. Brewing Technology - The Market and the Environment. Proc. 6th Int. Brew. Technol. Conf., J. A. Irine and R. V. Wenn, Eds., Brewing Technology Services Limited: Surrey, UK, 1996, pp. 327-331.
28. Edmunds, M. D., Allan, G. R., Fincher, G. B., and Stuart, I. M., The quantification of (1-3, 1-4)-β-glucanase iso-enzymes during malting using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Proc. Conv. Inst. Brew. Asia Pacific Sect., 23rd, Sydney. Institute of Brewing: London, 1994, pp. 79-83.
29. Essery, R. E., Kirsop, B. H., and Pollock, J. R. A., Studies on barley and malt 1. Effects of water on germination tests. J. Inst. Brew., 1954, 60, 473-475.
30. Haselmore, R. M., Tunnicliffe, C. G., Peipi, M. G., and Slack, C. R., Using wort β-glucan levels to aid selection of in a barley breeding programme. Proc. Conv. Inst. Brew. Aust. N.Z. Sect., 21st, Auckland. Institute of Brewing: London, 1990, pp. 79-82.
31. Henry, R. J., Genetic and environmental variation in the pentosan and β-glucan contents of barley, and their relation to malting quality. J. Cereal Sci., 1986, 15, 269-277.
32. Henry, R. J., Changes in β-glucan and other carbohydrate components of barley during malting. J. Sci. Food Agric., 1988, 42, 333-341.
33. Hudson, J. R., Barley and Malt. The Institute of Brewing, Development of Brewing Analysis - A Historical Review, 1960, pp. 27-29.
34. Ingledew, W. M. and Patterson, C. A., Effect of nitrogen source and concentration on the uptake of peptides by a lager yeast in continuous culture, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., 1999, 57, 9-17.
35. Jameson, R. P. M., Palmer, G. H. and Bryce, J. H., Resistant starch formation in brewing. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 2000, 37, 53-57.
36. Locke, J. M., Bryce, J. H. and Morris, P. C., Interactions between the biosynthesis and action of ethylene and polyamines during germination and seedling growth of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Expt. Bot., 2000, 51, 1843-1849.
37. Martin, H. L., and Bamforth, C. W., The relationship between β- glucan solubilase, barley autolysis and malting potential. J. Inst. Brew., 1980, 86, 216-221.
38. McCafferty, C. A., Perch-Neilsen, N. and Bryce, J. H., The effects of aerobic and anaerobic germination on the debranching enzyme, limit dextrinase, in barley malt. J. Am. Assoc. Brew. Chem. 2000, 58, 47-50.
39. Meilgaard, M. C., Wort composition with special reference to the use of adjuncts. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 1976, 13, 78-90.
40. Munck, L., Quality assessment of brewing barley varieties. Proc. Eur. Brew. Conv. Congr., Madrid, IRL Press: Oxford, 1987, pp. 145-156.
41. Narziss, L., Reicheneder, E., and Edney, M. J., Importance of beta-glucan size and concentration in malting. Monatsschr. Brauwiss., 1989, 42, 430-437.
42. Newport Scientific. Application Manual for the Rapid Visco Analyser. Newport Scientific Pty. Ltd: Warriewood, Australia, 1998, pp. 19-26.
43. Okon, E. U and Uwaifo, A. O., Partial purification and proportions of beta-amylase isolated from Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench, J. Food Agric. Chem., 1984, 32, 11-15.
44. Palmer, G. H., Morphology of starch granules in cereal grains and malts. J. Inst. Brew., 1972, 78, 326-332.
45. Palmer, G. H., Cereals in malting and brewing. In: Cereal Science and Technology. G. H. Palmer, Ed., Aberdeen University Press: Aberdeen, 1989, pp. 61-242.
46. Palmer, G. H., Cereal science and malting technology - The future, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., 1992, 50, 121-130.
47. Palmer, G. H., Standardization of homogeneity. In: Malting Technology, Eur. Brew. Conv. Monograph 23. Fachverlag Hans Carl: Nürnberg, Germany, 1994, pp. 2-43.
48. Palmer, G. H., Achieving homogeneity in malting. Proc. Eur. Brew. Conv. Cong., Cannes, IRL Press: Oxford, 1999, pp. 323-363.
49. Palmer, G. H., Malt performance is more related to inhomogeneity of protein and β-glucan than to standard malt analysis. J. Inst. Brew., 2000, 106, 189-192.
50. Patterson, C. A. and Ingledew, W. M., Utilisation of peptides by a lager brewing yeast. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., 1999, 57, 1-8.
51. Pollock, J. R. A., Kirsop, B. H. and Pool, A. A., Hordein and its transformation during malting. Proc. Eur. Brew. Conv. Congr., Rome, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1959, pp. 89-99.
52. Recommended Methods of Analysis of the Institute of Brewing. The Society: London, 1989.
53. Schonfeld, F., Recommended Methods of Analysis, J. Inst.Brew., 1909, 77, 181-226.