Cell interaction with nanopatterned surface of implants

Nanomedicine

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 937-947

  Lavenus, Sandrine ^a   Ricquier, Jean Charles ^a   Louarn, Guy ^a   Layrolle, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

cell adhesion; cell differentiation; nanostructured surface; osseointegration; protein adsorption; titanium implant

Indexed keywords

NANOFILM; NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ADSORPTION; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; HUMAN; METAL IMPLANTATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE INTERACTION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WETTABILITY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;

EID: 77956094057     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.10.54     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CD, Dalby MJ: The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading. J. Mat. Sci. 18(2), 399-404 (2007).
2. Le Guehennec L, Lopez-Heredia MA, Enkel B, Weiss P, Amouriq Y, Layrolle P: Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Acta Biomater. 4(3), 535-543 (2008).
3. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS et al.: Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. NattAcad. Sci. USA 106(7), 2130-2135 (2009).
4. Bhatia SN, Yarmush ML, Toner M: Controlling cell interactions by micropatterning in co-cultures: hepatocytes and 3T3 fibroblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 34(2), 189-199 (1997).
5. Covas DT, Panepucci RA, Fontes AM et aL: Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from diverse human tissues share functional properties and gene-expression profile with CD146 + perivascular cells and fibroblasts. Exp. Hematol. 36(5), 642-654 (2008).
6. Puckett S, Pareta R, Webster TJ: Nano rough micron patterned titanium for directing osteoblast morphology and adhesion. Int. J. Nanomed. 3(2), 229-241 (2008).
7. Cai K, Frant M, Bossert J, Hildebrand G, Liefeith K, Jandt KD: Surface functionalized titanium thin films: zeta-potential, protein adsorption and cell proliferation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 50(1), 1-8 (2006).
8. Lee S-Y, Takai M, Kim H-M, Ishihara K: Preparation of nano-structured titanium oxide for biosensor substrate by wet corrosion. Curr. Appl. Physics 9, E266-E269 (2009).
9. Shibata Y, Hosaka M, Kawai H, Miyazaki T: Glow discharge plasma treatment of titanium plates enhances adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to the plates through the integrin-mediated mechanism. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 17(6), 771-777 (2002).
10. Swart KM, Keller JC, Wightman JP, Draughn RA, Stanford CM, Michaels CM: Short-term plasma-cleaning treatments enhance in vitro osteoblast attachment to titanium. J. OralImplantol. 18(2), 130-137 (1992).
11. Kurze P, Drysmann W, Knofler W: Anodic oxidation using spark discharge: a new surface treatment method for medical technology. Stomatol DDR 36(10), 549-554 (1986).
12. Andersson AS, Brink J, Lidberg U, Sutherland DS: Influence of systematically varied nanoscale topography on the morphology of epithelial cells. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience 2(2), 49-57 (2003).
13. Suh JY, Jang BC, Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim K: Effect of hydrothermally treated anodic oxide films on osteoblast attachment and proliferation. Biomaterials 24(2), 347-355 (2003).
14. Zhu B, Zhang Q, Lu Q et al.: Nanotopographical guidance of c6 glioma cell alignment and oriented growth. Biomaterials 25(18), 4215-4223 (2004).
15. Her HJ, Kim JM, Kang CJ, Kim YS: Fabrication of thin film titania with nanopores, nanopoles, and nanopipes by nanoporous alumina template. J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 8(9), 4808-4812 (2008).
16. Streicher R: Nanosurfaces and nanostructures for artificial orthopedic implants. Nanomedicine 2(6), 861-874 (2007).
17. Covani U, Giacomelli L, Krajewski A et al.\ Biomaterials for orthopedics: a roughness analysis by atomic force microscopy. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 82(3), 723-730 (2007).
18. Anselme K, Bigerelle M: Modelling approach in cell/material interactions studies. Biomaterials 27(8), 1187-1199 (2006).
19. Le Guehennec L, Martin F, Lopez-Heredia MA etal.\ Osteoblastic cell behavior on nanostructured metal implants. Nanomedicine 3(1), 61-71 (2008).
20. Eisenbarth E, Myele J, Nachtigall W, Breme J: Influence of the surface structure of titanium materials on the adhesion of fibroblast. Biomaterials 17, 1399-1403 (1996).
21. Citeau A, Guicheux J, Vinatier C et al.: In vitro biological effects of titanium rough surface obtained by calcium phosphate grid blasting. Biomaterials 26(2), 157-165 (2005).
22. Lee TM, Chang E, Yang CY: Attachment and proliferation of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblasts on Ti6Al4V: effect of surface chemistries of the alloy. Biomaterials 25(1), 23-32 (2004).
23. Olivares-Navarrete R, Raz P, Zhao G et al.\ Integrin a2p1 plays a critical role in osteoblast response to micron-scale surface structure and surface energy of titanium substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105(41), 15767-15772 (2008).
24. Faghihi S, Azari F, Zhilyaev AP, Szpunar JA, Vali H, Tabrizian M: Cellular and molecular interactions between mc3T3-e1 pre-osteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion. Biomaterials 28(27), 3887-3895 (2007).
25. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M et aL: High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 74(1), 49-58 (2005).
26. Cai K, Bossert J, Jandt KD: Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 49(2), 136-144 (2006).
27. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z: Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 17(2), 137-146 (1996).
28. Sigal GB, Mrksich M, Whitesides GM: Effect of surface wettability on the adsorption of proteins and detergens. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 3464-3473 (1998).
29. Roach P, Eglin D, Rohde K, Perry CC: Modern biomaterials: a review -bulk properties and implications of surface modifications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18(7), 1263-1277 (2007).
30. Woo KM, Chen VJ, Ma PX: Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 67(2), 531-537 (2003).
31. Miller R, Guo Z, Vogler EA, Siedlecki CA: Plasma coagulation responses to surfaces with nanoscale chemical heterogeneity. Biomaterials 27(2), 208-215 (2006).
32. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R: Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51(3), 475-483 (2000).
33. 2 type influences fibronectin adsorption. J. Mat. Sci. 16(12), 1173-1178 (2005).
34. Schneider G, Burridge K: Formation of focal adhesions by osteoblasts adhering to different substrata. Exp. Cell Res. 214(1), 264-269 (1994).
35. Filho Fces, Menezes GC: Osteoblasts attachment and adhesion: how bone cells fit fibronectin-coated surfaces. Mat. Sci. Engineering C24, 637-641 (2004).
36. Lord M, Foss M, Besenbacher F: Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsortpion and cellular response. Nanotoday 5, 66-78 (2010).
37. Kim MH, Kino-Oka M, Taya M: Designing culture surfaces based on cell anchoring mechanisms to regulate cell morphologies and functions. Biotechnol. Adv. 28(1), 7-16 (2010).
38. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Altebaeumer T, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kern D: Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron-and submicron-scale porous structures of titanium surfaces. Cells Tissues Organs 178(1), 13-22 (2004).
39. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF: Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro-and nanostructured substrates. J. Cell Science 116(Pt 10), 1881-1892 (2003).
40. Anselme K, Bigerelle M: Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion. J. Mat. Sci. 17, 471-479 (2006).
41. 2 blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 12(5), 515-525 (2001).
42. Broberg M, Eriksson C, Nygren H: GpIIb/IIIa is the main receptor for initial platelet adhesion to glass and titanium surfaces in contact with whole blood. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 139(3), 163-172 (2002).
43. Keller JC, Stanford CM, Wightman JP, Draughn RA, Zaharias R: Characterizations of titanium implant surfaces. III. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28(8), 939-946 (1994).
44. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM: Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 7(3), 302-310 (1992).
45. Deligianni DD, Katsala N, Ladas S, Sotiropoulou D, Amedee J, Missirlis YF: Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials 22(11), 1241-1251 (2001).
46. Xavier SP, Carvalho PS, Beloti MM, Rosa AL: Response of rat bone marrow cells to commercially pure titanium submitted to different surface treatments. J. Dentistry 31(3), 173-180 (2003).
47. Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT, Mrksich M: Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107(11), 4872-4877 (2010).
48. Bhadriraju K, Yang M, Ruiz SA, Pirone D, Tan J, Chen C: Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. Exp. Cell. Res. 313(16), 3616-3623 (2007).
49. Mcbeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS: Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 6, 483-495 (2004).
50. Hartmann C: A wnt canon orchestring osteoblastogenesis. Trends Cell Biol 16(3), 151-158 (2006).
51. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R et al.: The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 6(12), 997-1003 (2007).
52. Anselme K, Noel B, Flautre B et aL: Association of porous hydroxyapatite and bone marrow cells for bone regeneration. Bone 25(Suppl. 2), S51-S54 (1999).
53. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE: Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4), 677-689 (2006).
54. Lipski AM, Pino CJ, Haselton FR, Chen IW, Shastri VP: The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function. Biomaterials 29(28), 3836-3846 (2008).
55. Gregory CA, Gunn WG, Peister A, Prockop DJ: An alizarin red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal. Biochem. 329(1), 77-84 (2004).
56. Bonewald LF, Harris SE, Rosser J et aL\ Von kossa staining alone is not sufficient to confirm that mineralization in vitro represents bone formation. Calcif Tissue Int. 72(5), 537-547 (2003).
57. Akiyama S, Katagiri T, Namiki M et al.: Constitutively active BMP type I receptors transduce BMP-2 signals without the ligand in C2C12 myoblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 235(2), 362-369 (1997).
58. Aoki H, Fujii M, Imamura T etal.: Synergistic effects of different bone morphogenetic protein type I receptors on alkaline phosphatase induction. J. Cell Sci. 114(Pt 8), 1483-1489 (2001).
59. Vetrone F, Variola F, Tambasco De Oliveira P etaL\ Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate. Nano Letters 9(2), 659-665 (2009).
60. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Simoes LG etai: The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression. Biomaterials 30(25), 4053-4062 (2009).
61. Olivares-Navarrete R, Hyzy S, Hutton D et aL\ Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on the induction of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblastic lineage. Biomaterials 31(10), 2728-2735 (2010).
62. Anselme K: Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 21(7), 667-681 (2000).
63. Lange R, Luthen F, Beck U, Rychly J, Baumann A, Nebe B: Cell-extracellular matrix interaction and physico-chemical characteristics of titanium surfaces depend on the roughness of the material. Biomol. Eng. 19(2-6), 255-261 (2002).
64. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW et al.\ Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (mg63). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29(3), 389-401 (1995).
65. Perizzolo D, Lacefield WR, Brunette DM: Interaction between topography and coating in the formation of bone nodules in culture for hydroxyapatite-and titanium-coated micromachined surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 56(4), 494-503 (2001).
66. Chehroudi B, Brunette DM: Subcutaneous microfabricated surfaces inhibit epithelial recession and promote long-term survival of percutaneous implants. Biomaterials 23(1), 229-237 (2002).
67. Gonzalez-Garcia C, Sousa SR, Moratal D, Rico P, Salmeron-Sanchez M: Effect of nanoscale topography on fibronectin adsorption, focal adhesion size and matrix organisation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 77(2), 181-190 (2010).
68. Santiago AS, Santos EA, Sader MS, Santiago MF, Soares Gde A: Response of osteoblastic cells to titanium submitted to three different surface treatments. Brazilian Oral Res. 19(3), 203-208 (2005).
69. Wang CC, Hsu YC, Su FC, Lu SC, Lee TM: Effects of passivation treatments on titanium alloy with nanometric scale roughness and induced changes in fibroblast initial adhesion evaluated by a cytodetacher. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 88(2), 370-383 (2008).
70. Cohen A, Liu-Synder P, Webster T: Decreased fibroblast and increased osteoblast functions on ionic plasma deposited nanostructured Ti coatings. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2, 385-390 (2007).
71. Miller D, Vance R, Thapa A, Webster T, Haberstroch K: Comparaison of fibroblast and vascular cell adhesion to nano-structured poly(lactic co glycolic acid)films. Appl. Bionics Biochem. 2, 1-7 (2005).
72. Ogawa T, Saruwatari L, Takeuchi K, Aita H, Ohno N: Ti nano-nodular structuring for bone integration and regeneration. J. Dental Res. 87(8), 751-756 (2008).
73. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Roser K, Albrektsson T: Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. Biomaterials 23(8), 1809-1817 (2002).
74. Eriksson C, Nygren H, Ohlson K: Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials 25(19), 4759-4766 (2004).
75. Vogler EA, Graper JC, Harper GR, Sugg HW, Lander LM, Brittain WJ: Contact activation of the plasma coagulation cascade. I. Procoagulant surface chemistry and energy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29(8), 1005-1016 (1995).
76. Hunt BJ, Parratt R, Cable M, Finch D, Yacoub M: Activation of coagulation and platelets is affected by the hydrophobicity of artificial surfaces. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 8(4), 223-231 (1997).
77. Sawase T, Jimbo R, Baba K, Shibata Y, Ikeda T, Atsuta M: Photo-induced hydrophilicity enhances initial cell behavior and early bone apposition. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 19(5), 491-496 (2008).
78. Kohavi D, Schwartz Z, Amir D, Mai CM, Gross U, Sela J: Effect of titanium implants on primary mineralization following 6 and 14 days of rat tibial healing. Biomaterials 13(4), 255-260 (1992).
79. Boyan BD, Schwartz Z, Hambleton JC: Response of bone and cartilage cells to biomaterials in vivo and in vitro. J. Oral Implantol 19(2), 116-122; discussion 136-1117 (1993).
80. Schwartz Z, Amir D, Boyan BD et al.: Effect of glass ceramic and titanium implants on primary calcification during rat tibial bone healing. Calcif. Tissue Int. 49(5), 359-364 (1991).