Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 535-543

  Le Guehennec, Laurent ^a   Lopez Heredia, Marco Antonio ^a   Enkel, Benedicte ^a   Weiss, Pierre ^a   Amouriq, Yves ^a   Layrolle, Pierre ^a  

^a Universite de Nantes   (France)

Author keywords

Cell biomaterial interaction; Dental implant; Osteoblasts; Surface roughness; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BLASTING; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL PROSTHESES; HYDROPHILICITY; OSTEOBLASTS; PHOSPHATASES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUBSTRATES; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

CELL BEHAVIOURS; CELL SURFACES; CELL-BIOMATERIAL INTERACTIONS; CELL/B.E; MC3T3-E1 CELL; ORAL IMPLANTS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTIC CELLS; TITANIA SURFACES; TITANIUM IMPLANT SURFACE;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CALCIUM; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CARBON; HYDROXYAPATITE; PHOSPHORUS; PLASTIC; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOPOLISHING; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CERAMICS; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FILOPODIUM; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; OXIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOPOGRAPHY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 41549153284     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Davies J.E. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 11 (1998) 391-401
2. Berglundh T., Abrahamsson I., Lang N.P., and Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 14 (2003) 251-262
3. Albrektsson T., and Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces. Part 2. Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 544-564
4. Esposito M., Coulthard P., Thomsen P., and Worthington H.V. The role of implant surface modifications, shape and material on the success of osseointegrated dental implants. A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 13 (2005) 15-31
5. Puleo D.A., and Thomas M.V. Implant surfaces. Dent Clin N Am 50 (2006) 323-338
6. Cooper L.F., Masuda T., Yliheikkila P.K., and Felton D.A. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 13 (1998) 163-174
7. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 21 (2000) 667-681
8. Lauer G., Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M., Otten J.E., Hübner U., Schmelzeisen R., and Schilli W. The titanium surface texture effects adherence and growth of human gingival keratinocytes and human maxillar osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Biomaterials 22 (2001) 2799-2809
9. 2 blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 (2001) 515-525
10. Ellingsen J.E., Johansson C.B., Wennerberg A., and Holmén A. Improved retention and bone-to implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 19 (2004) 659-666
11. Le Guehennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., and Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 23 (2007) 844-854
12. Esposito M., Hirsch J.M., Lekholm U., and Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 106 (1998) 721-764
13. Sader M.S., Balduino A., Soares Gde A., and Borojevic R. Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Clin Oral Impl Res 16 (2005) 667-675
14. Citeau A., Guicheux J., Vinatier C., Layrolle P., Pilet P., and Daculsi G. In vitro biological effects of titanium rough surface obtained by calcium phosphate grid blasting. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 157-165
15. Sanz A., Oyarzun A., Farias D., and Diaz I. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Impl Dent 10 (2001) 126-131
16. Novaes A., Souza S., de Oliveira P., and Souza A. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 17 (2002) 377-383
17. Buser D., Broggini N., Wieland M., Schenk R.K., Denzer A.J., Cochran D.L., Hoffmann B., Lussi A., and Steinemann S.G. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 83 (2004) 529-533
18. Germanier Y., Tosatti S., Broggini N., Textor M., and Buser D. Enhanced bone apposition around biofunctionalized sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Clin Oral Impl Res 17 (2006) 251-257
19. de Oliveira P.T., Zalzal S.F., Beloti M.M., Rosa A.L., and Nanci A. Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. J Biomed Mater Res A 80 (2007) 554-564
20. Zhao G., Raines A.L., Wieland M., Schwartz Z., and Boyan B.D. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 28 (2007) 2821-2829
21. Ahmad M., McCarthy M.B., and Gronowicz G. An in vitro model for mineralization of human osteoblast-like cells on implant materials. Biomaterials 20 (1999) 211-220
22. Owens D.K., and Wendt R.C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13 (1969) 1741-1747
23. Suzuki A., Guicheux J., Palmer G., Miura Y., Oiso Y., Bonjour J.P., and Caverzasio J. Evidence for a role of p38 MAP kinase in expression of alkaline phosphatase during osteoblastic cell differentiation. Bone 30 (2002) 91-98
24. Sudo H., Kodama H.A., Amagai Y., Yamamoto S., and Kasai S. In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria. J Cell Biol 96 (1983) 191-198
25. Guicheux J., Lemonnier J., Ghayor C., Suzuki A., Palmer G., and Caverzasio J. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase by BMP-2 and their implication in the stimulation of osteoblastic cell differentiation. J Bone Miner Res 18 (2003) 2060-2068
26. Bächle M., and Kohal R.J. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Impl Res 15 (2004) 683-692
27. Kim M.J., Choi M.U., and Kim C.W. Activation of phospholipase D1 by surface roughness of titanium in MG63 osteoblast-like cell. Biomaterials 27 (2006) 5502-5511
28. 2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 27 (2006) 926-936
29. Marinucci L, Balloni S, Becchetti E, Belcastro S, Guerra M, Calvitti M et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on human osteoblast proliferation and gene expression in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2006;21:719-25; Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2007;22:19 [erratum].
30. Schwartz Z., Lohmann C.H., Oefinger J., Bonewald L.F., Dean D.D., and Boyan B.D. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 13 (1999) 38-48
31. Anselme K., and Bigerelle M. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater 1 (2005) 211-222
32. Kim M.J., Kim C.W., Lim Y.J., and Heo S.J. Microrough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 79 (2006) 1023-1032
33. Steinemann S.G. Titanium - the material of choice?. Periodontology 2000 17 (1998) 7-21
34. Schuler M., Trentin D., Textor M., and Tosatti S.G. Biomedical interfaces: titanium surface technology for implants and cell carriers. Nanomedicine 1 (2006) 449-463
35. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Johansson C., and Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 17 (1996) 15-22
36. Ivanoff C.J., Widmark G., Johansson C., and Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 18 (2003) 341-348
37. Sul Y.T., Johansson C., Wennerberg A., Cho L.R., Chang B.S., and Albrektsson T. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 20 (2005) 349-359
38. Zhao G., Schwartz Z., Wieland M., Rupp F., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Cochran D.L., et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 74 (2005) 49-58
39. Giordano C., Sandrini E., Busini V., Chiesa R., Fumagalli G., Giavaresi G., et al. A new chemical etching process to improve endosseous implant osseointegration: in vitro evaluation on human osteoblast-like cells. Int J Artif Organs 29 (2006) 772-780
40. Li L.H., Kong Y.M., Kim H.W., Kim Y.W., Kim H.E., Heo S.J., et al. Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 2867-2875
41. Xavier S.P., Carvalho P.S., Beloti M.M., and Rosa A.L. Response of rat bone marrow cells to commercially pure titanium submitted to different surface treatments. J Dent 31 (2003) 173-180