Nano rough micron patterned titanium for directing osteoblast morphology and adhesion

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 229-241

  Puckett, Sabrina ^a   Pareta, Rajesh ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^a  

^a Brown University   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Nanophase; Orthopedic; Osteoblasts; Surface topography; Titanium

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN FIBRIL; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOMATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE GROWTH; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL JUNCTION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESMOSOME; ELECTRON BEAM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NANOANALYSIS; NANODEVICE; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; PARTICLE SIZE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL SIZE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOPARTICLES; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 55749115452     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. [AAOS] American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. 2006a. Number of total hip replacement procedures [online]. Accessed August 31, 2006. URL: http://www.aaos.org/Research/stats/Total%20Hip%20Replacement%20Chart.pdf.
2. [AAOS] American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. 2006b. Number of total knee replacement procedures. Accessed August 31, 2006. URL: http://www.aaos.org/Research/stats/ Total%20Knee%20Replacement%20Chart.pdf.
3. [AAOS] American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. 2006c. Total knee and hip replacement surgery projections show meteoric rise by 2030. Accessed August 31, 2006. URL: http://www6.aaos.org/news/Pemr/ press_release.cfm?prnumber=442.
4. Anselm Wiskott HW, Belser UC. 1999. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Impl Res, 10:429-44.
5. Anselme K. 2000. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials, 21:667-81.
6. Bloebaum RD, Dupont JA. 1993. Osteolysis from a press-fit hydroxyapatite-coated implant. J Arthroplasty, 8:195-202.
7. Brunski JB. 1991. Influence of biomechanical factors at the bone-biomaterials interface. In: Davies JE (ed). The bone-biology materials interface. Toronto: Univ of Toronto Pr, pp. 391-404.
8. de Oliveira PT, Nanci A. 2004. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials, 25:403-13.
9. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. 2004. Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles. Biomaterials, 25:4175-83.
10. Holmgren SK, Taylor KM, Bretscher LE, et al. 1998. Code for collagen's stability deciphered. Nature, 392:666-67.
11. Ichikawa T, Hirota K, Kanitani H, et al. 1996. Rapid bone resorption adjacent to hydroxyapatite-coated implants. J Oral Implantol, 22:232-35.
12. Jayaraman M, Meyer U, Buhner M, et al. 2004. Influence of titanium surfaces on attachment of osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Biomaterials, 25:625-31.
13. Kaplan FS, Hayes WC, Keaveny TM, et al. 1994. Form and function of bone. In: Simon SP (ed). Orthopedic basic science. Ohio: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, pp. 127-85.
14. Karlsson M, Palsgard E, Wilshaw PR, et al. 2003. Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina. Biomaterials, 24:3039-46.
15. Kay S, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, et al. 2002. Nanostructured polymer/ nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. Tissue Eng, 8:753-61.
16. Liu H, Webster TJ. 2007. Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials, 28:354-69.
17. Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky, et al. 2000. Integrating cells into tissues. In: Matsodavia P (ed). Molecular cell biology. 4th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
18. Long M, Rack HJ. 1998. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement - a materials science perspective. Biomaterials, 19:1621-39.
19. Palin E, Liu H, Webster TJ. 2005. Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotech, 16:1828-35.
20. Price RL, Gutwein LG, Kaledin L, et al. 2003a. Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: influence of chemistry, phase, and topography. J Biomed Mater Res A, 67:1284-93.
21. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, et al. 2003b. Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials, 24:1877-87.
22. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. 1998. Mechanical properties and the hierarchal structure of bone. Med Eng Phys, 20:92-102.
23. Tang G, Zhang R, Yan Y, et al. 2004. Preparation of porous anatase titania film. Mater Letter, 58:1857-60.
24. Taton TA. 2001. Boning up on biology. Nature, 412:491-2.
25. Toni A, Lewis CG, Sudanese A, et al. 1994. Bone demineralization induced by cementless alumina-coated femoral stems. J Arthroplasty, 9:435-44.
26. Ward BC, Webster TJ. 2007. Increased functions of osteoblasts on nanophase metals. Biomaterials, 27:574-78.
27. Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon CG, et al. 2004. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials, 25:1215-24.
28. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. 1999a. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials, 20:1221-27.
29. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. 1999b. Design and evaluation of nanophase alumina for orthopedic/dental applications. Nano Struct Mater, 12:983-86.
30. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, et al. 2000a. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials, 21:1803-10.
31. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, et al. 2000b. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res, 51:475-83.
32. Webster TJ. 2001. Nanophase ceramics: the future orthopedic and dental implant material. Adv Chem Eng, 27:125-66.
33. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, et al. 2001. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng, 7:291-301.
34. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. 2004. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6A14V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials, 25:4731-39.
35. Webster TJ, Smith TA. 2005. Increased osteoblast function on PLGA composites containing nanophase titania. J Biomed Mater Res A, 74:677-86.
36. Webster TJ, Ahn ES. 2006. Nanostructured biomaterials for tissue engineering bone. Adv Biochem Engin/Biotechnol, 103:275-308.
37. Yang Y, Glover R, Ong JL. 2003. Fibronectin adsorption on titanium surfaces and its effect on osteoblast precursor cell attachment. Col Surf B: Biointerfs, 30:291-97.
38. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Qazi JI, et al. 2005. Improved bone cell adhesion on ultrafine grained titanium and Ti-6A1-4V. Ceramic Transactions, 159:239-46.