Effects of passivation treatments on titanium alloy with nanometric scale roughness and induced changes in fibroblast initial adhesion evaluated by a cytodetacher

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 370-383

  Wang, C C ^a   Hsu, Y C ^a   Su, F C ^a   Lu, S C ^a   Lee, T M ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion force; Cytodetachment; Nanometric scale; Roughness; Ti 6Al 4V

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION FORCE; CYTODETACHMENT; NANOMETRIC SCALE; ROUGHNESS; TI-6AL-4V;

ADHESION; ALLOYS; ALUMINUM; BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; FIBROBLASTS; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; INORGANIC COATINGS; OXIDES; PASSIVATION; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TISSUE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM OXIDES;

TITANIUM ALLOYS;

3 (4,5 DIMETHYL 2 THIAZOLYL) 2,5 DIPHENYLTETRAZOLIUM BROMIDE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; COLORIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODETACHER; FIBROBLAST; FORCE; MOUSE; NANOANALYSIS; NANODEVICE; NONHUMAN; STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; WETTABILITY;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; FIBROBLASTS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NIH 3T3 CELLS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; WETTABILITY;

EID: 58149389437     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31604     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 2-surfaces: Influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation. Biomaterials 2001;22:1987-1996.
2. Ku C-H, Pioletti DP, Browneb M, Gregson PJ. Effect of different Ti-6Al-4V surface treatments on osteoblasts behaviour. Biomaterials 2002;23:1447-1454.
3. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Kasemo B, Larsson K, Lundstrom I, McQueen DH, Skalak R. The interface zone of inogranic implants in vivo: Titanium implants in bone. Ann Biomed Eng 1983;11:1-27.
4. Kasemo B. Bio-compatibility of titanium implants: Surface science aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:832-837.
5. Lee TM, Chang E, Yang CY. Effect of passivation on the dissolution behavior of Ti6Al4V and vacuum-brazed Ti6Al4V in Hank's ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid solution, Part I: Ion release. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1999;10:541-548.
6. Lee TM, Chang E, Yang CY. Surface characteristics of Ti6Al4V alloy: Effect of materials, passivation and autoclaving. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1998;9:439-448.
7. Lee TM, Chang E, Yang CY. Attachment and proliferation of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblasts on Ti6Al4V: Effect of surface chemistries of the alloy. Biomaterials 2004;25:23-32.
8. Reyes CD, Garcia AJ. A centrifugation cell adhesion assay for high-throughput screening of biomaterials surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:328-333.
9. Furukawa KS, Ushida T, Nagase T, Nakamigawa H, Noguchi T, Tamaki T, Tanaka J, Tateishi T. Quantitative analysis of cell detachment by shear stress. Mater Sci Eng C 2001;17:55-58.
10. Truskey GA, Proulx TL. Relatinship between 3T3 cell spreading and the strength of adhesion on glass and silane surfaces. Biomaterials 1993;14:243-254.
11. Evans E, Berk D, Leung A. Detachment of agglutinin-bonded red blood cells. I. Forces to rupture molecular-point attachments. Biophys J 1991;59:838-848.
12. Tozeren A, Sung KL, Chien S. Theoretical and experimental studies on cross-bridge migration during cell disaggregation. Biophys J 1989;55:479-487.
13. Yamamoto A, Mishima S, Maruyama N, Sumita M. A new technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to detach a cell from a material. Biomaterials 1998;19:871-879.
14. Technical Documents Department, NanoScop® Command Reference Manual, CA, USA, Digital Instruments, Inc.; 1996, Chapter 12, p 87-88.
15. Subrahmanyam TV, Prestidge CA, Ralston J. Contact angle and surface analysis studies of sphalerite particles. Miner Eng 1996;9:727-741.
16. Comella BT, Scanlon MR. The determination of the elastic modulus of microcantilever beams using atomic force microscopy. J Mater Sci 2000;35:567-572.
17. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. New-York: Wiley; 1976.
18. Black J. Biological Performance of Materials. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992.
19. Andrade JD. Principles of protein adsorption. In: Andrade JD, editor. Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. p 1-80.
20. Horbett TA, Brash JL. Proteins at interfaces: Current issues and future prospects. In: Brash JL, Horbett TA, editors. Proteins at Interfaces: Physiochemical and Biochemical Studies. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1987. p 1-33.
21. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Surface science aspects on inorganic biomaterials. CRC Crit Rev Biocomp 1986;2:335-380.
22. Anderson JM. Inflammation, would healing and the foreign body response. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. San Diego: Academic Press; 2004, p 165-173.
23. Kim YJ, Shin J-W, Park K, Lee JW, Yui N, Park S-A, Jee KS, Kim JK. A study of compatibility between cells and biopolymeric surfaces through quantitative measurements of adhesive forces. J Biomater Sci Polymer Ed 2003;14:1311-1321.
24. den Braber ET, de Ruijter JE, Smits HTJ, Ginsel LA, von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Quantitative analysis of cell proliferation and orientation on substrate with uniform parallel surface micro-grooves. Biomaterials 1996;17:1093-1099.
25. Lange R, Luthen F, Beck U, Rychly J, Baumann A, Nebe B. Cell-extracullular matrix interaraction and physical and physicol-chemical characteristics of titanium surfaces depend on the roughness of the materials. Biomol Eng 2002;19:255-261.
26. Huang H-H, Ho C-T, Lee T-H, Lee T-L. Effect of surface roughness of ground titanium on initial cell adhesion. Biomol Eng 2004;21:93-97.
27. Wang JH-C, Grood ES, Florer J, Wenstrup R. Alignment and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts in microgrooved silicone substrata subjected to cyclic stretching. J Biomech 2000;33:729-735.
28. Feng B, Chen JY, Qi SK, He L, Zhao JZ, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and bioactivity. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2002;13:457-464.
29. Anselme K. Review: Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:667-681.
30. Thomas CH, McFarland CD, Jenkins ML, Rezania A, Steele JC, Healy KE. The role of vitronectin in the attachment and spatial distribution of bone-derived cells on materials with patterned surface chemistry. J Biomed Materi Res 1997;37:81-93.
31. Hayman EG, Pierschbacher MD, Suzuki S, Ruoslahti E. Vitronectin - A major cell attachment-promoting protein in fetal bovine serum. Exp Cell Res 1985;160:245-258.
32. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Materi Res 1998;41:422-430.
33. Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Qu SX, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials 2003;24:4663-4670.