Response of osteoblastic cells to titanium submitted to three different surface treatments;Resposta de células osteoblásticas ao titânio submetido a três diferentes tratamentos de superfície

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 203-208

  Santiago, Adriana Soares ^a   dos Santos, Euler Araújo ^a   Sader, Márcia Soares ^a   Santiago, Marcelo Felippe ^a   de Almeida Soares, Gloria ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biocompatible materials; Osteoblasts; Surface properties; Titanium

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FLUORIDE SODIUM; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SULFURIC ACID; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; MOUSE; OSTEOBLAST; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; DENTAL MATERIALS; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; MICE; OSTEOBLASTS; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; SODIUM FLUORIDE; SULFURIC ACIDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 33747576761     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242005000300009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Lundgren A, Sul YT. Experimental studies on oxidized implants. A histomorphometrical and biomechanical analysis. Appl Osseointegr Res 2000;1:21-4.
2. Anderson PA, Copenhaver JC, Tencer AB, Clark JM. Response of cortical bone to local controlled release of sodium fluoride: the effect of implant insertion site. J Orthop Res 1991;9:890-901.
3. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, et al. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:155-66.
4. Bigerelle M, Anselme K, Noel B, Ruderman I, Hardouin P, Iost A. Improvement in the morphology of titanium-based surfaces: a new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response. Biomaterials 2002;23:1563-77.
5. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3(2):81-100.
6. Chehroudi B, Brunette DM. Subcutaneous microfabricated surfaces inhibit epithelial recession and promote long-term survival of percutaneous implants. Biomaterials 2002;23:229-37.
7. Diniz MG, Soares GA, Coelho MJ, Fernandes MH. Surface topography modulates the osteogenesis in human bone marrow cell cultures grown on titanium samples prepared by a combination of mechanical and acid treatments. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:421-32.
8. Ecki P. Evaluation of the repair process in mechanically injured rat bone stimulated by sodium fluoride with nontoxic doses. Ann Acad Med Stetin 1999;45:195-209.
9. Ellingssen JE. Surface configuration of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1995;17:36-46.
10. Hallab N, Bundy K, O'Connor RL, Jacobs JJ. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng 2001;71:55-71.
11. Lange R, Luthen F, Beck U, Rychyl J, Baumann A, Nebe B. Cell-extracellular matrix interaction and physicochemical characteristics of titanium surfaces depend on the roughness of the material. Biomol Eng 2002;19:255-61.
12. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
13. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990;143:420-30.
14. Owens D, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 1969;13:1741-7.
15. Perizzolo D, Lacefield WR, Brunette DM. Interactions between topography and coating in the formation of bone nodules in culture for hydroxyapatite-and titanium-coated micromachined surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;56:494-503.
16. Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffezic N, Comte V, Lagneau C, Lissac M. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behavior. Mater Sci Eng 2003;23:551-60.
17. Rosa AL, Beloti MM, Noort RV. Osteoblastic differentiation of cultured rat bone marrow cells on hydroxyapatite with different surface topography. Dent Mater 2003;19:768-72.
18. Sena LA, Rocha NCC, Andrade MC, Soares GA. Bioactivity assessment of titanium sheets electrochemically coated with thick oxide film. Surface Coat Technol 2003;166:254-8.
19. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Roser K, Albrektsson T. Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodized implants. Biomaterials 2002;23:1809-17.
20. Vanzillotta PS. Avaliação in vitro de chapas de titânio com diferentes tratamentos de superfície em solução simuladora de plasma humano [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia da UFRJ; 2003.
21. Xavier SP, Carvalho PSP, Beloti MM, Rosa AL. Response of rat bone marrow cells to commercially pure titanium submitted to different surface treatments. J Dent 2003;31:173-80.