Perspectives on using multimedia scenarios in a PBL medical curriculum

Medical Teacher

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 766-772

  Persson, Anne Christine ^a   Fyrenius, Anna ^a   Bergdahl, Bjrn ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; MULTIMEDIA; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SWEDEN;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MULTIMEDIA; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; SWEDEN;

EID: 77956068295     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01421591003688381     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Areskog N-H. 1992. The new medical education at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Linkoping University: A challenge for both students and teachers. Scand J Soc Med 20(1):1-4.
2. Azer SA. 2007. Twelve tips for creating trigger images for problem-based learning cases. Med Teach 29(2-3):93-97.
3. Balslev T, de Grave W, Muijtjens AMM, Eika B, Scherpbier AJJA. 2008. The development of shared cognition in paediatric residents analysing a patient video versus a paper patient case. Adv Health Sci Educ 14(4):557-565.
4. Balslev T, de Grave WS, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. 2005. Comparison of text and video cases in a postgraduate problem-based learning format. Med Educ 39(11):1086-1092.
5. Barrows HS. 1986. A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Med Educ 20(6):481-486.
6. Biggs J, Tang C. 2007. Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill and Open University Press.
7. Brynhildsen J, Dahle LO, Fallsberg MB, Rundquist I, Hammar M. 2002. Attitudes among students and teachers on vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Teach 24(3):286-288.
8. Carlile S, Barnet S, Sefton A, Uther J. 1998. Medical problem based learning supported by intranet technology: A natural student centred approach. Int J Med Inform 50(1-3):225-233.
9. Dahle LO, Brynhildsen J, Fallsberg MB, Rundquist I, Hammar M. 2002. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: Examples and experiences from Linköping, Sweden. Med Teach 24(3):280-285.
10. Dahlgren MA, Ö berg G. 2001. Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. High Educ 41(3):263-282.
11. De Leng BA, Dolmans DHJM, Van De Wiel MWJ, Muijtjens AMM, Van Der Vleuten CPM. 2007. How video cases should be used as authentic stimuli in problem-based medical education. Med Educ 41(2):181-188.
12. Dolmans D, Schmidt H. 1996. The advantages of problem-based curricula. Postgrad Med J 72(851):535-538.
13. Dolmans DHJM, Schmidt HG. 2006. What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning? Adv Health Sci Educ 11(4):321-336.
14. Dolmans DHJM, Snellen-Balendong H, Wolfhagen IHAP, Van Der Vleuten CPM. 1997. Seven principles of effective case design for a problembased curriculum. Med Teach 19(3):185-189.
15. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Wijnen WHFW. 2001. Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Med Educ 35(9):884-889.
16. Elliott KA. Visual triggers: Improving the effectiveness of virtual patient encounters. ASCILITE 2000 Conference Proceedings. Example of EDIT-scenario. Available from: http://www.liu.se/hu/edit/edit- demo/edit/medical-programme/examples/examples/Malin-Halvarsson/part-1/index. html Excellent Learning Environment. Available from: http://www.hsv.se/ qualityassurance/centresofexcellenceinhe.4.28afa2dc11bdcdc55748000 1731.html
17. Fyrenius A, Bergdahl B, Silén C. 2005. Lectures in problem-based learning: Why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning. Med Teach 27(1):61-65.
18. Fyrenius A, Wirell S, Silén C. 2007. Student approaches to achieving understanding: Approaches to learning revisited. Stud High Educ 32(2):149-165.
19. Hung W. 2009. The 9-step problem design process for problembased learning: Application of the 3C3R model. Educ Res Rev 4(2):118-141.
20. Jonassen DH. 1997. Instructional design models for well-structured and illstructured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development 45(1):65-90.
21. Kamin C, O'Sullivan P, Deterding R, Younger M. 2003. A comparison of critical thinking in groups of third-year medical students in text, video, and virtual PBL case modalities. Acad Med 78(2):204-211.
22. Kiviloog L. 2002. Interacting with EDIT. Sweden: Linköping University.
23. Lonka K, Lindblom-Ylänne S. 1996. Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. High Educ 31(1):5-24.
24. Margetson D. 1998. Problem-based learning: What counts as problembased learning? Educ Health 11(2):193-201.
25. Marton F, Säljö R. 1976a. Different approaches to learning on qualitative differences in learning outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol 46:4-11.
26. Marton F, Säljö R. 1976b. On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. Br J Educ Psychol 46:115-127.
27. Parkin A, Dogra N. 2000. Making videos for medical undergraduate teaching in child psychiatry: The development, use and perceived effectiveness of structured videotapes of clinical material for use by medical students in child psychiatry. Med Teach 22(6):568-571.
28. Rodriguez EL. 2004. PBL-groups communication about pictures in an interactive scenario. MSc ed. Linköping: Linköping University.
29. Russel K. The problem of the problem and perplexity. In: PBL conference 1999, PBL a way forward. Proceedings of "PBL: A way forward", the 1999 PBL-conference, 1999 July 7-10. Montreal (QC), Canada: University of Quebec. pp 180-196.
30. Silén C, Uhlin L. 2008. Self-directed learning: A learning issue for students and faculty! Teach High Educ 13(4):461-475.
31. Van den Hurk MM, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Van der Vleuten CPM. 2001. Quality of student-generated learning issues in a problembased curriculum. Med Teach 23(6):567-571.
32. Van den Hurk MM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Dolmans DHJM, Van der Vleuten CPM. 1999. Student-generated learning issues: A guide for individual study? Educ Health 12(2):213-221.