The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations

From Orthography to Pedagogy: Essays in Honor of Richard L. Venezky

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 37-62

  Massaro, Dominic W ^a   Jesse, Alexandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925731295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613028     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Adams, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133-176.
2. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory and Cognition, 10, 565-575.
3. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89-106.
4. Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386-393.
5. Bowey, J. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition, 18, 419-427.
6. Bowey, J. A. (1993). Orthographic rime priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 247-271.
7. Calfee, R., Chapman, R., & Venezky, R. (1972). How a child needs to think to learn to read. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition in learning and memory(pp. 139-182). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
8. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing(pp. 151-216). London: Academic Press.
9. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589-608.
10. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI(pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
11. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204-256.
12. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 627-635.
13. Frost, R. (2003). The robustness of phonological effects in fast priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art(pp. 173-191). New York: Psychology Press.
14. Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language,48, 346-378.
15. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and synthesis of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674–691.
16. Goldinger, S. D., Azuma, T., Abramson, M., & Jain, P. (1997). Open wide and say “Blah!”: Attentional dynamics of delayed naming. Journal of Memory and Language,37(2), 190–216.
17. Gough, P. B., & Cosky, M. J. (1977). One second of reading again. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory(Vol. 2, pp. 271-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics,51, 49–56.
19. Groff, P. (1975). Research in brief: Shapes are cues to word recognition. Visible Language, 9, 67-71.
20. Haber, L. R., Haber, R. N., & Furlin, K. R. (1983). Word length and word shape as sources of information in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(2), 165-189.
21. Huey, E. B. (1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908)
22. Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., Rey, A., & Ziegler, J. C. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive ctivation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition(pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language,46(4), 723-750.
24. Jesse, A. (2000). Consistency effects in the fragmentation task. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California at Santa Cruz.
25. Johnson, N. F. (1975). On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(1), 17-29.
26. Jordan, T. R., Thomas, S. M., Patching, G. R., & Scott-Brown, K. C. (2003). Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 883-893.
27. Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus wholeword criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 862-885.
28. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 145-171.
29. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
30. Lukatela, G., Frost, S. J., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). Phonological priming by masked nonword primes in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language,39, 666-683.
31. Massaro, D. W. (1975). Understanding language: An information-processing analysis of speech perception, reading, and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
32. Massaro, D. W. (1979). Letter information and orthographic context in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(4), 595-609.
33. Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by eye and by ear: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21(3), 398-421.
35. Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 558-614.
37. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1107-1128.
38. Massaro, D. W., & Friedman, D. (1990). Models of integration given multiple sources of information. Psychological Review, 97, 225-252.
39. Massaro, D. W., Jastrzembski, J. E., & Lucas, P. A. (1981). Frequency, orthographic regularity, and lexical status in letter and word perception. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation(Vol. 15, pp. 163-200). New York: Academic Press.
40. Massaro, D. W., & Jesse, A. (2000). Explorations of reading processes within the framework of the fuzzy logical model of perception. Unpublished manuscript.
41. Massaro, D. W., & Sanocki, T. (1993). Visual information processing in reading. In D. M. Willows & R. S. Kruk (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities(pp. 139- 161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Massaro, D. W., Taylor, G. A., Venezky, R. L., Jastrzembski, J. E., & Lucas, P. A. (1980). Letter and word perception: Orthographic structure and visual processing in reading. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
43. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1-86.
44. MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Usable Dictionary (Version 2.00) [Electronic Database]. (1987). Didcot, OX, Australia: Informatics Division Science and Engineering Research Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton.
45. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation verification model for word and letter recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
46. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984). Word shape’s in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,10(3), 413-428.
47. Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way-street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language,39, 151-174.
48. Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 897-915.
49. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 482-503.
50. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: Reply to Zorzi (2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1232-1235.
51. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 275-281.
52. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
53. Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
54. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,23, 383-404.
55. Snodgrass, J. G., & Mintzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition:Faciliatory or inhibitory? Memory and Cognition, 21, 247-266.
56. Snodgrass, J. G., & Mintzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition:Faciliatory or inhibitory? Memory and Cognition, 21, 247-266.
57. Snodgrass, J. G., & Poster, M. (1992). Visual-word recognition thresholds for creenfragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers,24(1), 1-15.
58. Stanovich, K. E., & Bauer, D. W. (1978). Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 6, 410-415.
59. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language,36, 337-359.
60. Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 8(6), 513-520.
61. Thompson, M. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1973). Visual information and redundancy in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 49-54.
62. Treiman, R. (1994). To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 91-110.
63. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in written words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading(pp. 281-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 107-136.
65. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 466-477.
66. Updike, J. (1986). Roger’s version. New York: Knopf.
67. Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. Paris: Mouton.
68. Venezky, R. L., & Massaro, D. W. (1979). The role of orthographic regularity in word recognition. Theory and practice of early reading(Vol. 1, pp. 85-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Venezky, R. L., & Massaro, D. W. (1987). Orthographic structure and spelling-sound regularity in reading English words. In D. A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading, and writing(pp. 159-179). London: Academic Press.
70. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria. Memory and Cognition, 13, 557-572.
71. Whatmough, C., Arguin, M., & Bub, D. (1999). Cross-modal priming evidence for phonology- to-orthography activation in visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 66, 275-293.
72. Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.
73. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
74. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(4), 683–689.
75. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling to sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, andComputers,28, 504-515.
76. Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533-554.
77. Ziegler, J. C., Rey, A., & Jacobs, A. M. (1998). Simulating individual word, identification thresholds and errors in the fragmentation task. Memory and Cognition, 26, 490-501.
78. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What’s the pronunciation for _OUGH and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback inconsistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,29(4), 600-618.
79. Zorzi, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 847-856.