Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1261-1284

  Lacruz, Isabel ^a   Folk, Jocelyn R ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; REACTION TIME; READING; RECALL; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 7444228011     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000756     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Pilotti, M. (1999). Item-level analyses of lexical decision performance: Results from a mega-study. In Abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society (p.44). Los Angeles, CA: Psychonomic Society.
2. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
3. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
4. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204-256.
5. Cortese, M. (1998). Revisiting serial position effects in reading. Journal of Memory, and Language, 39, 652-665.
6. Cortese, M., & Simpson, G. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory & Cognition, 28, 1269-1276.
7. Folk, J. R. (1999). Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 892-906.
8. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
9. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
10. Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
12. Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723-750.
13. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
14. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
15. Kay, J., & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 449-469). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
16. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationship between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 592-617.
17. Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 151-174.
18. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K.E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
19. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(2), 277-282.
20. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
21. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tannenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
22. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Lnguage, 36, 337-359.
23. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
24. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466-477.
25. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition, 10, 434-442.
26. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
27. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
28. Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A.M. (1997a). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533-554.
29. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12(5), 379-384.
30. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997b). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29(4), 600-618.