System-perpetuating asymmetries between explicit and implicit intergroup attitudes among indigenous and non-indigenous Chileans

Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 163-172

  Haye, Andrés ^a   González, Roberto ^a   Ordóñez, Gabriela ^a   Bohner, Gerd ^b   Siebler, Frank ^c   Sirlopú, David ^a   Millar, Andrés ^a   de Tezanos Pinto, Pablo ^a   Torres, David ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Explicit and implicit measures; Implicit Association Test; Intergroup attitudes; Mapuche school students; Outgroup favouritism; Stereotype activation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955756968     PISSN: 13672223     EISSN: 1467839X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01311.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allport G W. The Nature of Prejudice 1954, Cambridge, Addison-Wesley
2. Bargh J A. The automaticity of everyday life. Advances in Social Cognition 1997, 1-61. Wyer R S. In, ed., Vol. 10, pp., Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
3. Bengoa J. Historia del Pueblo Mapuche (Siglo XIX y XX) 2000, Santiago, Chile, LOM
4. Bohner G, Siebler F, González R, Haye A, Schmidt E A. Situational flexibility of ingroup-related attitudes: A single category IAT study of people with dual national identity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2008, 11:301-317.
5. Chen M, Bargh J A. Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 33:541-560.
6. Crosby F, Bromley S, Saxe L. Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 87:546-563.
7. Devine P G. Stereotype and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 56:5-18.
8. Devos T, Banaji M R. American = White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:447-466.
9. Dunham Y, Baron A S, Banaji M R. The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:248-253.
10. Fazio R H, Jackson J R, Dunton B C, Williams C J. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69:1013-1027.
11. Fiske S, Cuddy A, Glick P, Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:878-902.
12. Fiske S T, Xu J, Cuddy A, Glick P. (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues 1999, 55:473-491.
13. Gawronski B, Hofmann W, Wilbur C. Are implicit attitudes unconscious? Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15:485-499.
14. Glick P, Fiske S. Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations 2001, 278-306. Jost J, Major B. eds., pp., New York, Cambridge University Press
15. Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 1995, 102:4-27.
16. Greenwald A G, Nosek B A. Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 2001, 48:85-93.
17. Greenwald A G, McGhee D E, Schwartz J L K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1464-1480.
18. Greenwald A G, Nosek B A, Banaji M R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:197-216.
19. Hinkle S W, Brown R J. Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances 1990, 48-70. Abrams D, Hogg M A. In, eds., pp., Hemel Hempstead, UK, Harvester Wheatsheaf
20. Hofmann W, Gawronski B, Gschwendner T, Le H, Schmitt M. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:1369-1385.
21. Ibáñez A, Haye A, González R, Hurtado E, Henríquez R. Multi-level analysis of cultural phenomena: The role of ERPs approach to prejudice. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 2009, 39:81-110.
22. Jost J T. Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition 2001, 89-102. Moskowitz G. In, ed., pp., Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum
23. Jost J T, Banaji M R. The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology 1994, 33:1-27.
24. Jost J T, Burgess D. Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:293-305.
25. Jost J, Kay A. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:498-509.
26. Jost J T, Banaji M R, Nosek B A. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology 2004, 25:881-919.
27. Jost J T, Pelham B W, Carvallo M R. Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002, 38:586-602.
28. Karpinski A, Hilton J L. Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:774-788.
29. Katz I, Hass R G. Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 16:893-905.
30. Kay A, Jost J T. Complementary justice: Effects of 'poor but happy' and 'poor but honest' stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:823-837.
31. Kay A, Jost J, Young S. Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science 2005, 16:240-246.
32. van Knippenberg A. Status difference, comparative relevance and intergroup differentiation. Differentiation Between Social Groups 1978, 179-199. Tajfel H. In, ed., pp., London, Academic Press
33. Lerner M J. The Belief in a Just World: A Foundational Delusion 1980, New York, Plenum Press
34. Lewin K. Self-hatred among Jews. Resolving Social Conflict 1941, 186-200. Lewin K. In, ed., pp., New York, Harper & Brothers
35. Marcuse H. One-dimensional Man 1964, Boston, Beacon Press
36. Marx K, Engels F. The German Ideology 1846, New York, International Publishers
37. Mullen B, Brown R, Smith C. Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology 1992, 22:103-122.
38. Nier J. How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2005, 8:39-52.
39. Nosek B, Banaji M, Greenwald A. Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:44-59.
40. Nosek B A, Banaji M R. The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition 2001, 19:625-666.
41. O'Brien L T, Major B. System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:1718-1729.
42. Olson M A, Fazio R H. Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:653-667.
43. Perugini M. Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology 2005, 44:29-45.
44. Rudman L A, Feinberg J, Fairchild K. Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition 2002, 20:294-320.
45. Rutland A, Cameron L, Milne A, McGeorge P. Social norms and self-presentation: Children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development 2005, 76:451-466.
46. Saiz J L. Estereotipos adscritos al indígena mapuche por adultos no Mapuche de Chile meridional. Revista Interamericana de Psicología 1986, 20:55-68.
47. Saiz J L. Atribución de estereotipos: Los indígenas Mapuche que perciben los chilenos. Psicología Social 2002, 145-151. Morales J FPáez DKornblit A LAsún D. In, eds., pp., Buenos Aires, Prentice Hall-Pearson Education
48. Sibley C G, Liu J H. New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:1222-1243.
49. Sidanius J, Pratto F. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression 1993, New York, Cambridge University Press
50. Siebler F, González R, Ordóñez G, Bohner G, Haye A, Sirlopú D. The role of category focus in the Implicit Association Test. Social Psychology 2010, 41:105-110.
51. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:220-247.
52. Strack F, Schwarz N, Bless H, Kübler A, Wänke M. Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology 1993, 23:53-62.
53. Tajfel H, Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 1979, 33-48. Austin W G, Worchel S. In, eds., pp., Monterrey, CA, Brooks-Cole
54. Uhlmann E, Dasgupta N, Elgueta A, Greenwald A, Swanson J. Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America. Social Cognition 2002, 20:198-226.
55. Wegener D T, Petty R E. The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 141-208. Zanna M, In, ed., Vol. 29, pp., San Diego, CA, Academic Press
56. Wilson T, Lindsay S, Schooler T. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 2000, 107:101-126.