Opening the black box of upper echelons: Drivers of poor information processing during the financial crisis

Corporate Governance: An International Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 212-233

  Rost, Katja ^a   Osterloh, Margit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bounded rationality; Corporate governance; Information processing; Psychological economics; Theory of upper echelons; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955531618     PISSN: 09648410     EISSN: 14678683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00796.x     Document Type: Article

References (160)

1. Adams S M, Flynn P M. Local knowledge advances women's access to corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2005, 13:836-846.
2. Arkes H R, Dawes R M, Christensen C. Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1986, 37:93-110.
3. Baker W E. The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology 1990, 89:775-811.
4. Baker H K, Nofsinger J R. Psychological biases of investors. Financial Services Review 2002, 11:97-116.
5. Banerjee A V. A Simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1992, 107:797-817.
6. Bantel K A. Strategic clarity in banking - Role of top management-team demography. Psychological Reports 1993a, 73:1187-1201.
7. Bantel K A. Top team, environment, and performance effects on strategic-planning formality. Group & Organization Management 1993b, 18:436-458.
8. Bantel K A, Jackson S E. Top management and innovations in banking - Does the composition of the top team make a difference. Strategic Management Journal 1989, 10:107-124.
9. Barber B M, Odean T. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2001, 116:261-292.
10. Barnes T R, Bolliger L, Cepeda A, Sykes D. Expanding diversity in the boardroom. The Corporate Governance Advisor 2007, 15:1-4.
11. Bar-Yosef S, Venezia I. An experimental study of overconfidence in accounting numbers predictions. 2006, Hebrew University Working Paper
12. Basov S, Blanckenberg L, Gangadharan L. Behavioural anomalies, bounded rationality and simple heuristics. 2007, University of Melbourne, Research Paper 1012
13. Baumann A O, Deber R B, Thompson G G. Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: the micro-certainty, macro-uncertainty phenomenon. Social Science & Medicine 1991, 32:167-174.
14. Beckmann D, Menkhoff L. Will women be women? Analyzing the gender difference among financial experts. Kyklos 2008, 61:364-384.
15. Ben-David I, Graham J R, Harvey C R. Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. 2007, SSRN Working Paper
16. Bertrand M, Schoar A. Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2003, 118:1169-1208.
17. Bessant J, Tidd J. Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2007, Chichester, Wiley & Sons
18. Biais B, Weber M. Hindsight bias and investment performance. Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI). 2007, Working Papers Nr. 476
19. Bliss R T, Rosen R J. Ceo compensation and bank mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 2001, 61:107-138.
20. Brammer S, Millington A, Pavelin S. Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2007, 15:393-403.
21. Brewer M B. Managing diversity: The role of social identities. Diversity inwork teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace 1995, 47-68. Jackson SRuderman M N. In, Eds., Washington, DC, American Psychological Association
22. Byrnes J P, Miller D C, Schafer W D. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:267-383.
23. Camerer C, Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American Economic Review 1999, 89:306-318.
24. Campbell K, Minguez-Vera A. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 83:435-451.
25. Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 83:435-451.
26. Carpenter M A, Geletkanycz M A, Sanders W G. Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management 2004, 30:749-778.
27. Carter D A, Simkins B J, Simpson W G. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review 2003, 38:33-53.
28. Certo S T, Lester R H, Dalton C M, Dalton D R. Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: a meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43:813-839.
29. Chang C J, Ho J L Y. Judgment and decision making in project continuation: A study of students as surrogates for experienced managers. Abacus 2004, 40:94-116.
30. Christensen-Szalanski J J, Bushyhead J B. Physicians' use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:928-935.
31. Cohen W L, Levinthal D M. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quaterly 1990, 35:128-152.
32. Coleman J. The foundations of social theory 1990, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
33. Cooper A C, Woo C W, Dunkelberg W C. Entrepeneurs' perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing 1988, 3:97-108.
34. Coser K. The functions of social conflict 1956, Glencoe, IL, Free Press
35. Coval J, Moskowitz T. Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance 1999, 54:1695-1704.
36. Cox T. Cultural diversity in organizations. Theory, research & practice 1993, San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler
37. Crisp R J, Ensari N, Hewstone M, Miller N W. A dual-route model of crossed categorization effects. European review of social psychology 2002, 35-74. Stroebe W, Hewstone M, ., Hove, UK/Philadelphia, PA, Psychological Press
38. Cyert R, March J G. A behavioral theory of the firm 1963, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall
39. Dahlin K B, Weingart L R, Hinds P J. Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48:1107-1123.
40. Daily C M, Certo S T, Dalton D R. A decade of corporate women: some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:93-99.
41. Daily C M, Dalton D R, Rajagopalan N. Governance through ownership: Centuries of practice, decades of research. Academy of Management Journal 2003, 46:151-158.
42. Dalton D R, Daily C M, Ellstrand A E, Johnson J L. meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19:269-290.
43. Davey G C L. Pathological worrying as excerbated problem-solving. Worrying; perspectives on theory, assessment, and treatment 1994, 35-59. Davey G C LTallis F., Chichester (UK), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
44. Dawes R M. Rational choice in an uncertain world 1988, San Diego and New York, Harcourt, Brace, Yovanovich
45. De Wit F R C, Greer L L. The black-box deciphered: A meta-analysis of team diversity, conflict, and team performance. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings 2008, 68th Annual Meeting, Anaheim, USA
46. Deaves R, Lüders E, Schröder M. The dynamics of overconfidence: evidence from stock market forecasters. 2005, Centre for European Economic Research Working Paper
47. Deutsch M. Conflicts: productive and destructive. Journal of Social Issues 1969, 25:7-41.
48. Devers C E, Wiseman R M, Holmes M R J. The effects of endowment and loss aversion in managerial stock option valuation. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50:191-208.
49. DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:147-160.
50. Doukas J A, Petzemas D. Acquisitions, overconfident managers and self-attribution bias. European Financial Management 2007, 13:531-577.
51. Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S. Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies 2005, 26:779-792.
52. Eckel C C, Grossman P J. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior 2002, 23:281-295.
53. Eisenhardt K M. Making fast decisions in bigbvelocity environments. Academy of Management Joumal 1989, 32:543-576.
54. Eisenhardt K M, Schoonhoven C B. Organizational growth - Linking founding teams, strategy, environment, and growth among united states seminconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:504-529.
55. Eiser J R. Social psychology: Attitudes, cognition, and social behaviour 1986, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
56. Elliott W B, Hodge F D, Kennedy J J, Pronk M. Are M.B.A. students a good proxy for nonprofessional investors? The Accounting Review 2007, 82:139-168.
57. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1961, 75:643-669.
58. Erhardt N L, Werbel J D, Shrader C B. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2003, 11:102-111.
59. Fama E. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance 1970, 25:383-402.
60. Fehr-Duda H, de Gennaro M, Schubert R. Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory and Decision 2006, 60:283-313. with Helga Fehr-Duda and Manuele De Gennaro
61. Finkelstein S, Hambrick D C. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:484-503.
62. Fischhoff B, Beyth R. " I knew it would happen": remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1975, 13:1-16.
63. Flap H D. Conflict, loyalty, and violence 1988, Frankfurt
64. Fox C R, Clemen R T. Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Science 2005, 51:1417-1432.
65. Fox C R, Hadar L. " Decisions from experience" = sampling error plus prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004). Judgment and Decision Making Journal 2006, 1:159-161.
66. Fox C R, Tversky A. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995, 110:585-603.
67. Francoeur C, Labelle R, Sinclair-Desgagne B. Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 81:83-95.
68. French K, Poterba J. Investor diversification and international equity markets. American Economic Review 1991, 81:222-226.
69. Frey B S, Benz M. From imperialism to inspiration: A survey of economics and psychology. The elgar companion to economics and philosophy 2004, 61-84. Davis J B, Marciano ARunde J., Cornwall, Edward Elgar
70. Gettier E. Is justefied true belief knowledge? Analysis 1963, 23:121-123.
71. Gonzalez M, Modernell R, Paris E. Herding behaviour inside the board: An experimental approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2006, 14:388-405.
72. Griffin D, Tversky A. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:411-435.
73. Grinblatt M, Keloharju M. How distance, language and culture infuence stockholdings and trades. Journal of Finance 2001, 56:1053-1073.
74. Gysler M, Brown Kruse J, Schubert R. Ambiguity and gender differences in financial decision making: An experimental examination of competence and confidence effects. 2002, Center for Economic Research, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Working Paper
75. Hambrick D C. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32:334-343.
76. Hambrick D C, Finkelstein S. Managerial discretion - A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior 1987, 9:369-406.
77. Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons - The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9:193-206.
78. Hambrick D C, Cho T S, Chen M A. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996, 41:659-684.
79. Hambrick D C, Finkelstein S, Mooney A C. Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review 2005, 30:472-491.
80. Hammond J, Keeney R, Raiffa H. The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review 1998, 76:47-58.
81. Harrison G W, List J A. Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature 2004, 42:1009-1055.
82. Hayward M L A, Hambrick D C. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly 1997, 42:103-127.
83. Hayward M L A, Shepherd D A, Griffin D. A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science 2006, 52:160-172.
84. Henderson R M, Clark K B. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quaterly 1990, 35:9-30.
85. Hiller N J, Hambrick D C. Conceptualizing executive hubris: the role of (Hyper-)Core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal 2005, 26:297-319.
86. von Holstein C S. Probabilistic forecasting: An experiment related to the stock market. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1972, 8:139-158.
87. Hribar P, Yang H. Ceo overconfidence, management earnings forecasts, and earnings management. 2006, Working paper, Cornell University
88. Janis I L. Victims of groupthink. A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascos 1972, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company
89. Kahneman D, Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts - A cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management Science 1993, 39:17-31.
90. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 1973, 80:237-251.
91. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
92. Kang H, Cheng M, Gray S J. Corporate governance and board composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2007, 15:194-207.
93. Katz D, Kahn R L. The social psychology of organizations 1966, New York, Wiley
94. Kaustia M, Knüpfer S. Do investors overweight personal experience? Evidence from ipo subscriptions. Journal of Finance 2008, 63:2679-2702.
95. Keck S. Top management team structure: differential effects of environmental context. Organization Science 1997, 8:143-156.
96. Kidd J B. The utilization of subjective probabilities in production planning. Acta Psychologica 1970
97. Klimoski R, Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management 1994, 20:403-437.
98. Knight D, Pearce C L, Smith K G, Olian J D, Sims H P, Smith K A, Flood P. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:445-465.
99. van Knippenberg D, Schippers M C. Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:515-541.
100. Kopstein A N, Crum R M, Celentano D D, Martin S S. Sensation seeking needs among 8th and 11th graders: characteristics associated with cigarette and marijuana use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2001, 62:195-203.
101. Langer E J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 32:311-328.
102. Lazear E P. Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 2004, 94:208-211.
103. Leahy R L. Cognitive therapy on Wall Street: Schemas and scripts of invulnerability. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 1992, 6:1-14.
104. Lewellen W G, Lease R C, Schlarbaum G G. Patterns of investment strategy and behavior among individual investors. Journal of Business 1977, 50:296-333.
105. Li J T, Hambrick D C. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48:794-813.
106. Loewenstein G F, Weber E U, Hsee C K, Welch E S. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:267-286.
107. Lubatkin M H, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga J F. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management 2006, 32:646-672.
108. Madrian B, Shea D. The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(K) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2001, 116:1149-1525.
109. Malmendier U, Tate G. Who makes acquisitions? Ceo overconfidence and the market's reaction. 2003, NBER Working Paper, No. 10813
110. Malmendier U, Tate G. Ceo overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance 2005, 60:2661-2700.
111. Malmendier U, Tate G. Who makes acquisitions? Ceo overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of Financial Economics 2008, 89:20-43.
112. March J G, Simon H A. Organizations 1958, New York, London, Wiley; Chapman & Hall
113. Massa M, Simonov A. Hedging, familiarity and portfolio choice. Review of Financial Studies 2006, 19:633-685.
114. Michel J G, Hambrick D C. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal 1992, 35:9-37.
115. Miller D, Droge C. Psycholgical and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986, 31:539-560.
116. Mintzberg H. New look at chief executives job. Organizational Dynamics 1973, 1:20-30.
117. Morrison A M, White R P, Van Velsor E. Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? 1987, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
118. Murphy K J. Executive compensation. Handbook of labor economics 1999, 2485-2563. Ashenfelter OCard D., Amsterdam
119. Murray A I. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 1989, 10:125-141.
120. Naqvi N, Shiv B, Bechara A. The role of emotion in decision making: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychological Science 2006, 15:260-264.
121. Oskamp S. Overconfidence in case study judgements. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1965, 29:261-265.
122. Paese P W, Feuer M A. Decisions, actions, and the appropriateness of confidence in knowledge. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1991, 4:1-16.
123. Pagano M, Roell A A, Zechner J. The geography of equity listing: Why do companies list abroad? Journal of Finance 2002, 67:2651-2694.
124. Pelled L H, Eisenhardt K M, Xin K R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999, 44:1-28.
125. Powell T C, Lovallo D, Caringal C. Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Academy of Management Review 2006, 31:175-196.
126. Prahalad C K, Bettis R, Ricciardi. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal 1986, 7:485-501.
127. Ricciardi V. A risk perception primer: A narrative research review of the risk perception literature in behavioral accounting and behavioral finance. 2004, SSRN Working Papers
128. Ricciardi V. The financial psychology of worry and women. 2008, SSRN Working Paper
129. Ricciardi V, Simon H K. What is behavioral finance? Business, Education and Technology Journal 2000, 2:2-9.
130. Ricciardi V, Simon H K. Behavioral finance: a new perspective for investors and financial professionals. 2001, Working Paper
131. Robichaud M, Dugas M J, Conway M. Gender differences in worry and associated cognitive-behavioral variables. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2003, 17:501-516.
132. Roll R. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business 1986, 59:197-216.
133. Rose C. Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2007, 15:404-413.
134. Rost K, Osterloh M. You pay a fee for strong beliefs: homogeneity as a driver of corporate governance failure. 2008, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304719, SSRN:
135. Rost K, Hölzle K, Gemünden H G. Promotor and champions? Pros and cons of the division of labour for economic progress. Schmalenbach Business Review 2007, 10:340-363.
136. Ruigrok W, Peck S I, Keller H. Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: evidence from swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43:1201-1226.
137. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1988, 1:7-59.
138. Schubert R. Analyzing and managing risks - On the importance of gender differences in risk attitudes. Managerial Finance 2006, 32:706-715.
139. Schubert R, Brown M, Gysler M, Brachinger H W. Financial decision making: Are women really more risk Averse? Gender and economic transactions. The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 1999, 89:381-385.
140. Sheridan A, Milgate G. Accessing board positions: A comparison of female and male board members' views. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2005, 13:847-855.
141. Simon H A. Human nature in politics - The dialog of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review 1985, 79:293-304.
142. Simons T, Pelled L H, Smith K A. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 42:662-673.
143. Sjöberg L. Are all crowds equally wise? A comparison of political election forecasts by experts and the public. Journal of Forecasting 2009, 28:1-18.
144. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Characterizing perceived risk. Perilous progress: technology as hazard 1985, 91-123. Kates R W, Hohenemser C, Kasperson J X., Boulder, CO, Westview
145. Spense M T. Problem-problem solver characteristics affecting the calibration of judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 67:271-279.
146. Steverman B, Bogoslaw D. The financial crisis blame game: Business Week. 2008-10-11
147. Strong N C, Xu X. Understanding the equity home bias: Evidence from survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics 2003, 85:307-312.
148. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations 2004, New York, Doubleday
149. Thaler R H. The winner's curse. Paradoxes and anomalies of economic life 1992, New York, Free Press
150. Tihanyi L, Ellstrand A E, Daily C M, Dalton D R. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management 2000, 26:1157-1177.
151. Turner M E, Pratkanis A R. Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 73:105-115.
152. Tuschke A, Sanders W G. Antecedents and consequences of corporate governance reform: The case of Germany. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24:631-649.
153. Tushman M L, Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986, 31:439-465.
154. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty - heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
155. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Adminstrative Science Quarterly 1997, 42:35-67.
156. Wagner A M, Houlihan D D. Sensation seeking and trait anxiety in hangglider pilots and golfers. Personality and Individual Differences 1994, 16:975-977.
157. van der Walt N, Ingley C. Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2003, 11:218-234.
158. Weick K E. The social psychology of organizing 1979, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
159. Wiersema M F, Bantel K A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal 1992, 35:91-121.
160. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking: beyond the optimum level of arousal 1979, Erlbaum, Hillsdale