Performance analysis of real-time component architectures: An enhanced model interchange approach

Performance Evaluation

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 612-633

  Moreno, Gabriel A ^a   Smith, Connie U ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Performance Engineering Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Component based real time systems; Model driven architecture analysis; Model to model transformation; Performance model interchange; Software performance engineering

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT BASED; DESIGN MODELS; MODEL TO MODEL TRANSFORMATION; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE MODEL; REAL-TIME SYSTEM DESIGNS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE ENGINEERINGS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE MODELS; TIME COMPONENTS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DESIGN; INTERCHANGES; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; XML;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

EID: 77955308397     PISSN: 01665316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2009.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. C.M. Woodside, G. Franks, and D.C. Petriu The future of software performance engineering International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) Washington, DC, May 2007 IEEE Computer Society 171 187
2. G.A. Moreno, C.U. Smith, and L.G. Williams Performance analysis of real-time component architectures: A model interchange approach Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance Princeton, NJ, June 2008 ACM Press
3. F. Budinsky, E. Merks, and D. Steinberg Eclipse Modeling Framework 2.0 2nd Edition 2006 Addison-Wesley Professional
4. F. Jouault, and I. Kurtev Transforming models with Atl Satellite Events at the MoDELS 2005 Conference Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006 Springer-Verlag 128 138
5. S.A. Hissam, G.A. Moreno, J.A. Stafford, and K.C. Wallnau Enabling predictable assembly Journal of Systems and Software: Special Issue on Component-Based Software Engineering 65 3 2003 185 198
6. M. Larsson, Predicting Quality Attributes in Component-Based Software Systems, Mlardalen University, 2004
7. V. Liu, I. Gorton, and A. Fekete Design-level performance prediction of component-based applications IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 31 11 2005 928 941 (Pubitemid 46395334)
8. P. Merson, and S.A. Hissam Predictability by construction SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA05) San Diego, CA, October 2005 ACM
9. S.A. Hissam, G.A. Moreno, K.C. Wallnau, Using Containers to Enforce Smart Constraints for Performance in Industrial Systems, CMU/SEI-2005-TN-040, Software Engineering Institute-Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005
10. G.A. Moreno, Creating custom containers with generative techniques, in: Proc. 5th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE06), Portland, OR, Oct., 2006
11. L. Bass, J. Ivers, M. Klein, P. Merson, Reasoning Frameworks. CMU/SEI-2005-TR-007. Software Engineering Institute-Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, PA, 2005
12. J. Ivers, and G.A. Moreno Model-driven development with predictable quality SIGPLAN Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems and Applications (OOPSLA07) Montreal, Quebec, Canada, October 2007 ACM
13. K.C. Wallnau, J. Ivers, Snapshot of Ccl: A Language for Predictable Assembly, CMU/SEI-2003-TN-025. Software Engineering Institute-Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2003
14. S.A. Hissam, J. Ivers, D. Plakosh, K.C. Wallnau, Pin Component Technology (V1.0) and Its C Interface, CMU/SEI-2005-TN-001, Software Engineering Institute-Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005
15. M. Gonzalez Harbour, J.J. Gutierrez Garcia, J.C. Palencia Gutierrez, and J.M. Drake Moyano Mast: Modeling and analysis suite for real-time applications Proceedings 13th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS) Washington, DC, June 2001 IEEE Computer Society
16. C.U. Smith, and C.M. Llad Performance model interchange format (Pmif 2.0): Xml definition and implementation Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST) Enschede, NL, Sept. 2004 2004 IEEE Computer Society 38 47
17. C.U. Smith, C.M. Llad, V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, and L.G. Williams From Uml models to software performance results: An Spe process based on Xml interchange formats Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP05) Palma de Mallorca, July 2005 ACM 87 98
18. L.G. Williams, and C.U. Smith Information requirements for software performance engineering Proceedings 1995 International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation Heidelberg, Germany, Sept. 1995 Springer
19. C.U. Smith, and L.G. Williams Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software 2002 Addison-Wesley Boston
20. L&S, Computer Technology, Inc., Performance Engineering Services Division, 110, PO Box 9802, (505) 988-3811, www.spe-ed.com, Austin, TX 78766
21. C.U. Smith, C.M. Llad, L.G. Williams, and R. Puigjaner Interchange formats for performance models: Experimentation and output Proc. Quantative Evaluation of Systems (QEST) Edinburgh, Scotland, Sept. 2007 IEEE
22. W3C, World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3c.org, 2001
23. S. Kent Model driven engineering M.J. Butler, L. Petre, K. Sere, Proc Third Int. Conf. On Integrated Formal Methods Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2002 Springer-Verlag London 286 298
24. D.C. Schmidt Guest editor's introduction: Model-driven engineering IEEE Computer 39 2 2006 25 31
25. OMG, Meta Object Facility (Mof) 2.0 Core Specification, http://www.omg.org/mof/, 2004
26. OMG, Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems (Marte), http://www.omgmarte.org/, 2007
27. R. Kazman, G. Abowd, L. Bass, and P. Clements Scenario-based analysis of software architecture IEEE Software 13 6 1996 47 55
28. R. Kazman, M. Klein, M. Barbacci, T. Longstaff, H. Lipson, J. Carriere, The architecture tradeoff analysis method, in: International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS98), Aug., 1998
29. sm: A method for the performance assessment of software architectures Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Software and Performance Rome, IT, July 2002 ACM Press
30. S. Balsamo, P. Inverardi, and C. Mangano An approach to performance evaluation of software architectures Workshop on Software and Performance Santa Fe, NM, October 1998 ACM 178 190
31. S. Balsamo, and M. Marzolla Performance evaluation of Uml software architectures with multiclass queueing network models WOSP 2005 Palma de Mallorca, July 2005 ACM 37 42
32. G. Gu, and D. Petriu From Uml to Lqn by Xml algebra-based model transformations WOSP 2005 Palma de Mallorca, July 2005 ACM 99 109
33. J.P. Lpez-Grao, J. Merseguer, and J. Campos From Uml activity diagrams to stochastic Petri nets: Application to software performance engineering Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance Redwood Shores, CA, Jan. 2004 ACM 25 36
34. D. Petriu, and C.M. Woodside Analyzing software performance requirements specification for performance Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance 2002 Rome, July 2002 ACM 1 9
35. N. Savino, E. Arraiz, A. Di Serio, J.L. Anciano, R. Puigjaner, Extending Uml to manage performance models for software architectures: A queuing network approach, in: Proc. 9th Int. Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, SPECTS, San Diego, CA, 2002
36. C.U. Smith, C.M. Lladó, Performance Model Interchange Format (Pmif 2.0): Xml Definition and Implementation Update Technical Report. L&S Computer Technology, Inc. Santa Fe, NM, 2007
37. C.U. Smith, V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, C.M. Llad, and L.G. Williams From Uml models to software performance results: An Spe process based on Xml interchange formats Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Software and Performance Palma, Illes Balears, Spain, July 2005 ACM Press 87 98
38. C.M. Woodside, D. Petriu, D. Petriu, H. Shen, T. Israr, and J. Merseguer Performance by unified model analysis (Puma) WOSP 2005 Palma de Mallorca, July 2005 ACM 1 12
39. A. D'Ambrogio A model transformation framework for the automated building of performance models from Uml models Proc. 2005 Workshop on Software and Performance Palma de Mallorca, July 2005 ACM Press 75 86
40. V. Grassi, R. Mirandola, and A. Sabetta A model transformation approach for the early performance and reliability analysis of component-based systems Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 4063 2006 270 284
41. H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner A model transformation from the Palladio Component Model to layered queueing networks Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5119 2008 58 78
42. A. Bertolino, V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, R. Mirandola, From Uml to Execution Graphs and Queueing Networks: Design and Implementation of the Xml-Based Tool Xprimat. Universita del L'Aquila. L'Aquila, Italy, 2004
43. V. Cortellessa, M. Gentile, and M. Pizzuti Xprit: An Xml-based tool to translate uml diagrams into execution graphs and queueing networks (Tool Paper) Proc. of 1st Int. Conf. on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems Enschede, NL 2004 IEEE Computer Society 342 343
44. H. Gomaa, and D.A. Menasce Performance engineering of component-based distributed software systems Dumke Lncs 2047: Performance Engineering State of the Art and Current Trends 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin 40 55
45. G. Gu, and D. Petriu Xslt transformation from Uml models to lqn performance models Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance Rome, July, 2002 2002 ACM 227 234
46. V. Cortellessa, S. Di Gregorio, and A. Di Marco Using atl for transformations in software performance engineering: A step ahead of java-based transformations? Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance Princeton, NJ, June 2008 ACM Press 127 131
47. S. Becker Coupled model transformations Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance Princeton, NJ, June 2008 ACM Press 103 114
48. A. Gherbi, F. Khendek, From Uml/Spt Models to Schedulability Analysis: Approach and a Prototype Implementation, Automated Software Engineering http://www.springerlink.com/content/jt45l5550m3u6p72/, 2009
49. X. Wu, and C.M. Woodside Performance modeling from software components Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance Redwood Shores, CA, January 2004 ACM 290 301
50. S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner Model-based performance prediction with the Palladio Component Model Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP07) Buenos Aires, Argentina, Feb. 2007 ACM
51. V. Grassi, R. Mirandola, and A. Sabetta A model-driven approach to performability analysis of dynamically reconfigurable component-based systems Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP07) Buenos Aires, Argentina, Feb. 2007 ACM
52. V. Cortellessa How far are we from the definition of a common software performance ontology? WOSP 2005 Palma de Mallorca, July 2005 ACM 195 204
53. C.U. Smith Performance Engineering of Software Systems 1990 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
54. EDIF. Edif Users' Group. Design Automation Department, Texas Instruments, PO Box 225474, MS-3668, Dallas TX 75265
55. EIA. 1994. Cdif-Case Data Interchange Format Overview. EIA/IS-106. Engineering Department, Electronics Industries Association, Arlington, VA
56. C.U. Smith, and L.G. Williams Performance engineering of object-oriented systems with speed R. Marie, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1245: Computer Performance Evaluation 1997 Springer Berlin, Germany 135 154
57. C.U. Smith, and L.G. Williams Performance engineering evaluation of corba-based distributed systems with Spe-Ed R. Puigjaner, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1998 Springer Berlin, Germany
58. P. Hughes, Sp Principles, O59/ICL226/0, STC Technology, 1988
59. H. Beilner, J. Mter, and N. Weissenburg Towards a performance modeling environment: News on hit Proceedings 4th International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation 1988 Plenum Publishing
60. C.U. Smith, C.M. Lladó, R. Puigjaner, Automatic generation of performance analysis results: Requirements and definition, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Proceedings of the European Performance Evaluation Workshop, 2009
61. M. Gonzalez Harbour, M. Klein, and J. Lehoczky Timing analysis for fixed-priority scheduling of hard real-time systems IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 20 1 1994 13 28