A model transformation framework for the automated building of performance models from UML models

Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP'05

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 75-86

  D'Ambrogio, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Automated model building; LQN; MDA; Model transformation; Software performance; UML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEROPERABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; QUEUEING NETWORKS; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

AUTOMATED MODEL BUILDING; LAYERED QUEUEING NETWORK (LQN); PERFORMANCE MODELS; SOFTWARE MODELS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

EID: 33748990901     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1071021.1071029     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. S. Balsamo, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, M. Simeoni, Model-Based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 30, n. 5, pp. 295-310, 2004.
2. S. Bernardi, S. Donatelli, J. Meseguer, From UML Sequence Diagrams and Statecharts to analysable Petri Nets, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP'02), Rome, Italy, July 2002.
3. V. Cortellessa, R. Mirandola, PRIMA-UML: a performance validation incremental methodology on early UML diagrams, Science of Computer Programming, vol. 44, pp. 101-129, 2002.
4. V. Cortellessa, A. D'Ambrogio, G. Iazeolla, Automatic Derivation of Software Performance Models from CASE documents, Performance Evaluation, 45(2-3):81-106, July 2001.
5. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, Classification of Model Transformation Approaches, Proceedings of the 2nd OOPSLA Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture, Anaheim, CA, USA, October 2003.
6. A. D'Ambrogio, G. Iazeolla, Steps towards the Automatic Production of Performance Models of Web Applications, Computer Networks Journal, vol. 41, pp. 29-39, January 2003.
7. A. D'Ambrogio, A. De Simone, Metamodel-based Automatic Building Of Performance Models From Software Models, Technical Report RI.13.04, Software Lab, Dept. Computer Science, University of Roma TorVergata, Roma, Italy, October 2004.
8. A. D'Ambrogio, G. Iazeolla, Metadata-driven Design of Integrated Environments for Software Performance Validation, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol 76/2, pp. 127-146, May 2005.
9. A. D'Ambrogio, SOON: a Tool for Software Performance Validation, International Journal of Modeling and Simulation, 2005 (to appear).
10. G.P. Gu, D.C. Petriu, XSLT transformation from UML models to LQN performance models, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP2002), Rome, Italy, July 24-26, 2002.
11. G.P. Gu, D.B. Petriu, Early Evaluation of Software Performance based on the UML Performance Profile, Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies conference on Collaborative research (CASCON03), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2003.
12. S.R. Judson, R.B. France, D.L. Carver, Specifying Model Transformations at the Metamodel Level, Proceedings of the Workshop in Software Model Engineering (WiSME2003), San Francisco, CA, USA, October 2003.
13. J.P. Lpez-Grao, J. Merseguer, J. Campos, From UML Activity Diagrams to Stochastic Petri Nets: Application to Software Performance Engineering, Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP'04), Redwood City, CA, USA, January 2004.
14. Microsoft, The Duwamish 7.0 Enterprise Application, http://msdn. microsoft.com.
15. Model-driven development, IEEE Software Special Issue, S.J. Mellor, A.N. Clark, T. Futagami (eds.), vol 20, n. 5, September 2003.
16. Object Management Group. Request for Proposal: MOF 2.0 Query / View / Transformations, 2002. http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/02-04-10.pdf.
17. Object Management Group, MDA Guide, version 1.0.1, June 2003.
18. Object Management Group, Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4, April 2002.
19. Object Management Group, UML Profile for Scheduling, Performance and Time, version 1.0, September 2003.
20. Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language (UML) Final Adopted Specification, version 2.0, 2003.
21. Object Management Group, XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification, version 2.0, May 2003.
22. D.C. Petriu, X. Wang, From UML description of high-level software architecture to LQN performance models", in (eds. M.Nagl, A. Schuerr, M. Muench), Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1779, pp. 47-62, Springer Verlag, 2000.
23. D.C. Petriu, H. Shen, Applying the UML Performance Profile: Graph Grammar based derivation of LQN models from UML specifications, in (eds. Tony Fields, et al.), Computer Performance Evaluation - Modelling Techniques and Tools, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2324, pp. 159-177, Springer Verlag, 2002.
24. D.B. Petriu, M. Woodside, A Metamodel for Generating Performance Models from UML Designs, Proceedings of UML2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3273, Lisbon, Portugal, October 11-15, 2004.
25. R. Pooley, Using UML to Derive Stochastic Process Algebra Models, Proceedings of the XV UK Performance Engineering Workshop, 1999.
26. QVT Partners, Revised Submission for MOF 2.0 Query/View/Transformations RFP, ver. 1.1 (ad/2003-08-08), August 2003. http://qvtp.org/downloads/1.1/ qvtpartnersl.1.pdf.
27. QVT Partners, QVT-Partners Eclipse Plug-in. http://qvtp.org/downloads/ qvtp-eclipse/.
28. J.A. Rolia, K.C. Sevcik, The Method of Layers, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(8):689-700, August 1995.
29. C.U. Smith, Performance Engineering of Software Systems, Addison Wesley, 1992.
30. M. Woodside, V. Vetland, M. Courtois, S. Bayarov, Resource Function Capture for Performance Aspects of Software Components and Sub-systems, in (eds. R. Dumke et al.) Performance Engineering, State of the Art and Current Trends, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2047, pp. 239-256, 2001.
31. C.M. Woodside, Tutorial Introduction to Layered Modeling of Software Performance - Edition 3.0, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa (Canada), May 2002.
32. WWW Consortium, XML Schema, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/XML/ Schema.
33. WWW Consortium, extensible Stylesheet Language: Transformations (XSLT), W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.
34. WWW Consortium, XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/XML/Query.