Interchange formats for performance models: Experimentation and ouput

Proceedings - 4th International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, QEST 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 91-100

  Smith, Connie U ^a   Llado, Catalina M ^b   Puigjaner, Ramon ^b   Williams, Lloyd G ^c  

^a Performance Engineering Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^c PerX   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPH THEORY; INTERSECTIONS; MARINE BIOLOGY; MARKUP LANGUAGES; PETRI NETS; QUEUEING NETWORKS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE; XML;

EXPRESSIVE POWERS; INTERCHANGE FORMATS; MODEL RESULTS; MODEL STUDIES; MODELING TOOLS; MULTIPLE RUNS; PERFORMANCE MODELING; PERFORMANCE MODELS; QUEUEING NETWORK MODELS; XML INTERCHANGES;

INTERCHANGES;

EID: 47949108944     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/QEST.2007.24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Mesquite software, http://www.mesquite.com.
2. PNML, Petri Net Markup Language. http://www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de/top/ pnml/.
3. TimeNet, Timed Net Evaluation Tool, http://pdv.cs.tu-berlin.de/~timenet/.
4. http://www4.cs.uni-dortmund.de/HIT/.
5. http://www.see.carieton.ca/rads/lqn/lqn-documentation/.
6. S. Balsamo and M. Marzolla. Performance evaluation of UML software architechtures with multiclass queueing network models. In Proc. of the Fith Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), 2005.
7. H. Beilner, Mter, and N. Weienberg. Towards a performance modeling environment: News on hit. In Proceedings 4th International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation. Plenum Publishing, 1988.
8. A. Bertolino, V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, and R. Mirandola. From UML to execution graphs and queueing networks: Design and implementation of the XML-based tool XPRIMAT Technical report, Universita' del 1'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy, 2004.
9. V. Cortellessa and R. Mirandola. Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams. In Proc. of the Fith Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), 2000.
10. A. D'Ambrogio. A model transformation framework for the automated building of performance models from UML models. In Proc. of the Fith Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), 2005.
11. V. Electronics Industries Association, Arlington. Cdif - case data interchange format overview, eia/is-106, 1994.
12. G. Gu and D. C. Petriu. XSLT transformation from UML models to LQN performance models. In Proc. of the Fith Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), pages 227-234, 2002.
13. P. Harrison, C. Liado, and R. Puigjaner. A general performance model interchange format. In 1st International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools (Valuetools), 2006.
14. J. Hillston. A tool to enhance model exploitation. Performance Evaluation, 22(1):59-74, 1995.
15. A. Hubbard. SPEX: The software performance experiment driver. Technical report, Real-time and Distributed Systems Lab, Dept. of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, 1997.
16. A. Hubbard, C. M. Woodside, and C. Schramm. Decais distributed experiment control and logging system. In Proceedings of CASCON, 1995.
17. R.Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling. John Wiley, 1991.
18. V. Lazowska, J. J. Zahorjan, G. Graham, and K. Sevcik. Quantitative System Performance: Computer System Analysis Using Queuing Network Models. Prentice-Hall, 1984.
19. J. A. Rolia and K. C. Sevcik. The method of layers. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 21(8):689-700, 1995.
20. H. Schwetman. CSIM17: A simulation model-building toolkit. In. Proceedings Winter Simulation Conference, 1994.
21. Simulog. MODLINE 2.0 QNAP2 9.3: Reference Manual, 1996.
22. C. Smith and C. Liado. Performance model interchange format (PMIF 2.0): XML definition and implementation, tecnical report. Technical report, Performance Engineering Services, 2007.
23. C. Smith and L. Williams. Panel presentation: A performance model interchange format. In Proc. of the International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, 1995.
24. C. Smith and L. Williams. A performance model interchange format. Journal of Systems and Software, 49(1):63-80, 1999.
25. C. Smith and L. Williams. Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
26. C. U. Smith, V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, C. M. Liado, and L. G. Williams. From UML models to software performance results: An SPE process based on XML interchange formats. In Proc. of the Fith Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), pages 87-98, July 2005.
27. SPE-ED. LS Computer Technology Inc. Performance Engineering Services Division, www.spe-ed.com.
28. W3C. World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3c.org/XML, 2003.
29. C. M. Woodside, D. C. Petriu, D. B. Petriu, H. Shen, T. Israr, and J. Merseguer. Performance by unified model analysis (PUMA). In Proc. of the Fith Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), 2005.
30. X. Wu and C. M. Woodside. Performance modeling from software components. In Proc. of the Fith Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP), 2004.
31. B. P. Zeigler, D. Fulton, P. Hammonds, and J. Nutoro. Framework for mands-based system development and testing in net-centric environment. ITEA Journal, 26(3), 2005.
32. B. P. Zeigler, H. Praehofer, and T. G. Kim. Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Integrating Discrete Event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems, Second Edition. Academic Press, 2000.